Quality vs quantity?
theDirkDiggler
Illinois
Now, i vastly prefer the longer sessions with the few high quality dancers, so the quantity of dances stays about the same, but i feel i get better value since the quality remains pretty high and i feel the experience is more, i don't know, meaningful or the fantasy is more realized with dances often (but not always) improving after more familiarity. I still get the occasional trial dances with the new hotties, though, that often end up not worth it or as worth it. Hence all the hubbub of ATFs and CFs. That is where the vast majority of my money goes now.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
17 comments
Latest
These days, my perception of quality is "high mileage and kinky, WITH a girl I know well enough that she turns me on to the point that I"m a horny dysfunctional mess even before we step into the booth or hotel room". So total pursuit of quality, which for me means my goal is always to have at least a CF if not ATF
^ @theDirkDiggler It's all good. I don't care where or what thread a good convo and discussion occurs. They all tend to overlap anyway. We all pretty much see each other in the latest threads.
I will agree, there is just something about a new hot girl that first time that adds a certain raw energy (similar to new relationship energy), that can heighten arousal very quickly, almost too quickly even if the dance itself is kind of subpar. But after all is sad and done, if the dance was subpar, i could have definitely left it instead of taken it and won't do her again for the most part.
SJG
For w/e reason I'm most excited about a girl the first time I meet her, it's usually downhill after-that - and the more I SC the more that's the case for me - when I was newer to SCing although I was still not into faves, I did not get burned-out on girls as quickly and was usually happy to see girls I'd gotten dances w/ b/f w/ the caveat that I did not SC as often back then; whereas now I can sometimes SC 3x/wk although it's not the norm for me but SCing more-often means I run into the same dancers more-often and the less I wanna get w/ them as opposed to it being a month or more since the last time I saw them.
But - I do often end-up on the wrong-side of the quantity vs quality thing - i.e. I end-up spending $$$ on girls that are not my preferred-type - the thick and/or curvy ebonies is what moves the needle for me most but since I don't like to stick w/ the same dancers I find myself spending on dancers that are not my type (thing/petite ones) where I'd be better off just sitting still and holding onto my $$$ vs getting dances from just "ok" dancers per my tastes.
So I get kinda caught in a PL-conundrum - I like variety but there are not enough of the girls I like to go around (thick and/or curvy) since these days the clubs I hit seem to be majority petite/slim girls vs brickhouses; thus I end-up folding/compromising and getting-dances/spending on girls that are not my optimal type but I still find sexy but I feel as if I wasted my $$$ instead of spent my $$$.
When I had an atf - it was great. However, I enjoyed lots of extras from other dancers (in that same club). The itc FS was amazing with my atf - and it was great to have a sure thing. She knew that I liked it rough - I liked to go for a long time - and she knew I’d deliver $$$ for her.