tuscl

WOW! gotta love shit like this

18 comments

  • gammanu95
    7 years ago
    Hmm, so a foreign company runs the cafeteria for the US senate AND isn't made to pay according to federal wage laws? Hard to believe.
  • Mate27
    7 years ago
    With her experience I would think she'd be able to move to the House of Representatives and make a few dollars more an hour.

    The trauma in her life has kept her from elevating her options, combined with a child. Too bad she didn't know the consequences before life got ahold of her when she was young.
  • poledancer83
    7 years ago
    I feel really bad for her. tells the story of a lot of dancers
  • etsutwigg222
    7 years ago
    Surely this has happened since Trump took office. I KNOW there is no possible way this type of pay issue was happening during the previous 8 years.
  • JohnSmith69
    7 years ago
    The girls situation sounds very similar to DS III, the results of a drug addicted mother who raises a stripper. But it's not the government or the employers fault. $10 an hour is a fair wage for a cafeteria worker.
  • poledancer83
    7 years ago
    how is it a fair wage if you cant live on the wage?
  • flagooner
    7 years ago
    Because if it wasn't fair she would quit and work a different job. They aren't forcing her to work there. If she quit, someone else would take the job.
  • JimGassagain
    7 years ago
    Yeah, she could work over at the house and make even more money. I bet she lives stripping in an all air dance Mecca called D.C.!
  • NinaBambina
    7 years ago
    It saddens me that, according to the article, single moms are 5x more likely to live in poverty.

    Everyone who works full time and contributes to society should be paid a wage they can live off of, this isn't a damn third world country.

    We're supposed to be the richest country but tons of people are still poor and still sick and we still have cities with poisoned drinking water. Socialist countries seem better than America right now.
  • flagooner
    7 years ago
    Then go live in one and then report back.
  • flagooner
    7 years ago
    "Everyone who works full time and contributes to society should be paid a wage they can live off of, this isn't a damn third world country. "

    I understand where you are coming from, but not all jobs are intended to provide a wage that supports a family.

    People need to acquire the skills to enable them to get a job that will allow them to support themselves and not just do the minimum and expect handouts to take care of them.
  • Corvus
    7 years ago
    A foreign company runs the Senate cafeteria! WTF is up with that?
  • wallanon
    7 years ago
    Are those really the best stock photos they could find for that article?
  • Estafador
    7 years ago
    @nina we're the richest because we stiff the poor. Our monetary worth is based off the sum of the few super rich and a medium of all the "regular" rich in the country. Purely currency wise anyway. This doesn't include a whole bunch of other factors either
  • bvino
    7 years ago
    Unless you agree that the poor are poor because they are stupid there is no reason to be poor .I work for a community college and there aren't any barriers to being a student here. We have some programs where students are making over $25.00 after one year and some that have six figures with an Associates degree. Germans will tell you "The Will is All". They are right.
  • rockstar666
    7 years ago
    Nina, socialist countries don't pay you to survive. The social safety net in the US is the best in the world for the poorest of people. It's the working poor and middle class who have the worst deal, mainly because we don't have national health care.
  • NinaBambina
    7 years ago
    "Nina, socialist countries don't pay you to survive."

    Please don't put words in my mouth, thanks in advance.

    My point was, since I'm apparently expected to be a regurgitation machine, people who work 40+ hours a week should be able to live off that. The "greatest and richest" country shouldn't have so many actual full-time workers living in poverty.
  • flagooner
    7 years ago
    ^ We will have to agree to disagree.

    I'm sure I'll raise the ire of many liberals on this board, but that has never stopped me before.

    Brief econ (and logic) lesson:
    Private companies have a responsibility to make profit. If they don't, they go bankrupt and unemployment goes up. The former employees then earn less (nothing).

    Mandating minimum pay rates reduces the number of employees a company will hire because employers will stop hiring once the incremental benefit no longer outweighs the incremental cost. Why would I hire someone at $15/hour if their contribution only produces $14.99 (or even if they could produce $20 if that extra $5 can be better invested, but let's keep it simple). This also inreases unemployment.

    In fact, I don't agree with minimum wages at all. If you are worth more than you are getting paid, renegotiate your compensation or find a new job where you can get what you are worth. An employer would rather give a raise to an employee that deserves it than lose him/her. The job description may just need to change a little so that the other workers wouldn't have grounds for complaints.

    This is another reason I am all for bonus pay above the flat pay scale, it provides incentives for employees to excel.
You must be a member to leave a comment.Join Now
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion