TUSCL's most controversial
larryfisherman
California
I'm just wondering your thoughts on the controversial people I post in this thread.
Juicebox69- I wasn't here when apparently he was trolling a lot. Some people love him, some people hate him. I don't see any harm in juice. I don't have any clue who his aliases are though.
San_Jose_Guy- Most people here seem to dislike him because of his long essays and his off topic stuff. Once again I don't see any harm in SJG, he posts his opinion, and he's very consistent in that. He stands up for what he believes in. The modern day Muhammad Ali lol. I just wish he would write some reviews.
JohnSmith69- Some people hate his stories and all that DS stuff. I personally don't mind them. He writes a lot of reviews and gives good club Intel, very valuable contributor. The only thing that annoys me a little is when he's high and he posts on here, and he tells us he's high and not to pay attention to anything he says. His writing is kind of incoherent when he's high. I don't know when he has time to be a lawyer, between fucking all these DSes, smoking weed all the time, and writing long stories on TUSCL :)
Lapdanceking82- I'll admit I'm kind of tired of all his cum in the pants stuff, does he have any other spiels? Some people love him and some people hate him.
Bavarian- not so much controversial, but just being a huge PL for allowing his CF to take advantage of him as much as she does. I admire him though for being able to tell his stories on here, and not being sensitive when it comes to the criticism he's got on here.
4got2wipe- perhaps I've been unfair to him, but when you have the lamest username in history, and in every comment, you say "Brilliant!", it kind of gets annoying after awhile.
Rech- Once again I wasn't here when most of his supposed trolling happened. From what I understand he used to spam the board. He seems like a cool guy to me.
Opinions?
Juicebox69- I wasn't here when apparently he was trolling a lot. Some people love him, some people hate him. I don't see any harm in juice. I don't have any clue who his aliases are though.
San_Jose_Guy- Most people here seem to dislike him because of his long essays and his off topic stuff. Once again I don't see any harm in SJG, he posts his opinion, and he's very consistent in that. He stands up for what he believes in. The modern day Muhammad Ali lol. I just wish he would write some reviews.
JohnSmith69- Some people hate his stories and all that DS stuff. I personally don't mind them. He writes a lot of reviews and gives good club Intel, very valuable contributor. The only thing that annoys me a little is when he's high and he posts on here, and he tells us he's high and not to pay attention to anything he says. His writing is kind of incoherent when he's high. I don't know when he has time to be a lawyer, between fucking all these DSes, smoking weed all the time, and writing long stories on TUSCL :)
Lapdanceking82- I'll admit I'm kind of tired of all his cum in the pants stuff, does he have any other spiels? Some people love him and some people hate him.
Bavarian- not so much controversial, but just being a huge PL for allowing his CF to take advantage of him as much as she does. I admire him though for being able to tell his stories on here, and not being sensitive when it comes to the criticism he's got on here.
4got2wipe- perhaps I've been unfair to him, but when you have the lamest username in history, and in every comment, you say "Brilliant!", it kind of gets annoying after awhile.
Rech- Once again I wasn't here when most of his supposed trolling happened. From what I understand he used to spam the board. He seems like a cool guy to me.
Opinions?
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
36 comments
Juice is just a good ol boy
JS69 are SJG are just long winded. No harm done
And LDK is just funin' us. No way is he serious
Now, if you want to hear who is controversial....
Some of them are colorful characters, and I believe they are much more so f2f than online.
But they aren't trying to choke off discussion or anything like that.
Some on Larry's list do present views which can provoke people. But I don't see anything wrong with that. And I actually admire Mr. LDK because I see him as being completely straight and a very entertaining guy. And as Mr. Deuce pointed out, there are lots of guys going to strip clubs for LDKing, its just that most won't admit it.
People who say provocative and challenging things are interesting.
But there are others who are continually trying to choke off discussion. After being a member for 18 months and declining to use Ignore, I've finally had to use it.
SJG
Robin Trower- Record Plant, Sausalito, Ca 8/11/73
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42Y90fGP…
But online people feel safe and those sorts of cues are hidden, and so people talk quite openly and so there can be big disparities in POV.
What I take real note of are just that subset of people who really seem to believe that not complying with the herd is somehow wrong.
SJG
Dougster. He went silent at the end of last year, but for a long time he relentlessly attacked a some people--Rickdougan and Tittyfan especially. I don't know why. Dougster and I got along, but I can understand why the objects of his wrath did not like him. I'm worried about Dougster. At best he got a wife or significant other, and no longer feels the need to post on TUSCL. At worst he is dead.
Juice, I think, is very inventive, and often very funny. He has created a lot of aliases like BagBoyJames that I enjoy. For some reason he started attacking Shadowcat, which was unfair. Shadow is a good and unobjectionable person.
LDK is an eponym. He writes about a strip club activity I'm not interested in, but he is certainly the king in his field.
San_Jose_Guy writes such long posts that I can't read them (and I've read War and Peace). SJG is, I think, genuinely strange but harmless.
JohnSmith69 is a valuable contributor. I don't know why some people hate him. He starts a lot of threads, which get a lot of comments. He produces some very good sex writing. He reveals a great deal about his personal life and feelings, putting himself out there for people to stomp on. JS69 writes well. I don't always agree with him, but I'm glad he is posting. For those who think JS69 is some phony troll, I can tell you that I've met him and he's the same in person as he is online.
Rech. I've met Rech several times, and he strikes me as a good guy. I think he tries to be funny, not a troll.
There have been some female members who have added a great deal of insight at key times, like one we had in Portland. But she seems to have retired from dancing and vanished from TUSCL.
There are a couple of guys who have brought substantial insight about Tijuana too.
Papi is one I have always found to be a bringer of crucial insights, even though I don't always see things the way he does.
SJG
To clarify I'm just talking about the people who are still active on TUSCL.
SJG
Robin Trower- Boston Music Hall, Boston, Ma 4/1/76
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwBivrds…
Transcendentalism, a type of philosophical tradition derived largely from Immanuel Kant.
SJG
You just missed Dougster. He stopped posting around Thanksgiving 2015. Shortly before you joined. He was a bit of an enigma. I think he wa a very intelligent guy. He knew about psychology but claimed it was just a hobby not his profession. He knew finance and my guess is that was his job.
Having said that, he often exhibited trolling behavior. Bumping old threads for no reason other than to just write "Fuck you Ricky Boy"
Jack I agree with you about shadow and I do apologize for my actions
I got a feeling Dougster never left just using multiple accounts
Nobody mentioned my boy Crazyjoe. Tisk tisk.
larry-f, if you can't recognize a troll or spammer when you see one, I can't help you there.
Ever since then, I think every new poster is a troll until proven otherwise. Also, most of the dancers. I know Hotstuff is real and I think Nina is, but not sure about the rest.
4got2wipe I don't read too many of his posts but his adlib seems to be considered hilarious. You don't hear too many people say the word "brilliant" after all.
Both SJG are boring as hell. They're just long winded but always catch me when he's saying something until I wonder why the poster is making it so long winded and realize SJG dun dooped me agaiun.
If you have the time to wade through his posts, you'll find that he has great taste in music, he's interested in social issues, knows a lot about math and science, and just generally a good guy. He needs to learn the subtle art of telling people to fuck themselves (skill that comes so naturally to me).
The only thing you need to know about posting here in my opinion is that if you don't get the joke maybe it's you.
Seriously though, the comment by motorhead:
"I don't find any of these guys controversial.
Juice is just a good ol boy
JS69 are SJG are just long winded. No harm done
And LDK is just funin' us. No way is he serious
Now, if you want to hear who is controversial...."
is spot on. However, I think lapdanceking82 may be serious. If he enjoys ejaculating in his pants who are any of us to judge?
If you're using "controversial" as a euphemism for trolling, I'm not trolling and I don't think any of the people you listed are trolling. Trolling requires some sort of intent to stir things up or, at the very least, a case where any normal person would know that what they're saying will piss people off.
Dougster did troll some people, but they were very easy to troll. He could bump a thread with "lol" and every 20 or 30 bumps rickdugan would write a three or four paragraph reply. So yes, Dougster was trolling rickdugan. But shame on rickdugan for responding. I put the blame for the trolling on his shoulders!
I agree he was probably a nice guy, but he could be different.
I think what the OP meant though was when someone is not trolling, when they are doing their best to present their views in a civil and respectful manner, but yet somehow people still feel threatened by this, and so that member is polarizing.
SJG
"The transcendentalists desired to ground their religion and philosophy in transcendental principles: principles not based on, or falsifiable by, physical experience, but deriving from the inner spiritual or mental essence of the human."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcende…