Which would you chose (Part 2)

I can't deal with sexually inexperienced women no matter how beautiful they are. Give me the best sex partner every time. But I also hate condoms so that's a tough call. I suspect the pro can make up for the need for protection.

I would pay extra for the cleaner (STI-wise) girl. That's the agreement I have with the wife -- if I ever need to pay an escort for FS or pay a dancer for P4P -- she wants me to pay extra for a clean girl, full stop. So I would go with #1.

Personally for you and given the emotional attachment you seem to have for these DSs over time, I would have you consider #2. It might be healthier emotion-wise to source it from a professional who will keep it professional. Gingerbread sounds like an awesome provider. That my 2¢.

More experience fot hald the price

For half the price

77, I enjoy both so I do both. But if I had to choose obviously I'd go for 1. But I'm only in love with DS 1, not DS II.

I'd probably go for #1 but the price would at least be a little consideration. Like if #1 was 1,000 and #2 was 500 versus is #1 was 400 and #2 was 200.

I usually like to work with low volume providers, well at least ones that I "perceive" to be a low volume provider. How the heck can I know what these girls do when I'm not around.

Lastly you have a connection (at least on your end) with #1 and to me that would be worth the extra money. I've had connections with 7s that I would choose over a 9 that I had no feelings for (other than thinking she's hot).

Crazyjoe would take number 5 and juice would take a 6 piece of chacken fangers with some bbq sauce.

^^^ And he'd definately super size it.... and to go.

Why choose? Variety is the spice of life

I wouldn't necessarily choose either, both sound like they could be fun. But if I HAD to choose one, with no delta in cost, it would be #1 easily.

Okay, now it's "#1 costs double #2", what now? For me, it depends on total cost. If #2 costs $150 and #1 costs $300, I'm down with #1. If #2 costs $250 and #1 costs $500, then #1 has passed my threshold, and what I'm really doing is going out to find a new #1 who I can talk down in price

69: Thanks for the clarification. 2x for #1 still sounds OK to me. I'd only tap #2 is no cleaner options existed. But if she's OK for you, then tapping both sounds like a winner. Man R U living the life or what?

Subra, unfortunately my #1s are past your threshold. But maybe somebody who doesn't overpay strippers for sex could get a better deal.

I am aspiring to reach your level of overpaying, but I am going to have to level-up a few times to get there :)

OK, the truth just can't stay in me. Below is the picture showed me of DS and himself. The other guys took the payoff to keep quite, but I have my scruples.

elysianhunter.wordpress.com

Ok, John, I have an option for you. In order to truly and accurately answer your question, a question you obviously need an answer to, here is my solution. Only because I have decided to assist you in anyway possible. Set it up for me to have a romp with both of these fair ladies, at your cost of course, and I will be able to make a professional, scientific decision and you will have your answer. Normally in scientific research it is optimal to conduct repeat tests, but for the sake of your delima I think two romps with each lady would be sufficient. Just let me know when and where.

Happy to help you out with this. It's the least I can do for such an esteemed fellow TUSCL monger. And remember scientific research always gains outside funding. Since this is the question you need answered, you should be that funding source. A final report, with color photos and even video, will be provided at no extra cost.

Corvus, don't take this personally, but neither DS would have you even if I paid. They are only whores for me. But you can find your own if you look hard enough.

I'd go with experience every time. There a difference to having to drive all the time to get satisfaction (and paying double) versus having a woman who can make you cum hard and who doesn't need to led by the hand.

It's great to just show up - lay back - and enjoy an expert mouth bring you to an intense orgasm. The experienced whore knows how to handle herself when you get a bit rough too.

No problem John, just trying to help you out. And don't worry about me, I have plenty of fun.

Condom or no condom is a make or break for me. With my preferences in mind I'd still choose B ONLY because the only chick that gets Bareback'd D is my wife. If I have to fuck A raw, I'd rather not fuck her at all.

I'm in Estafador's boat too. The only one I fuck bareback is my wife. I'd fuck #1 covered. It's sort of like buying expensive Scotch when diluting it with soda water, but, whatever.

If #1 is within $450/hr, then 2 hours with her for $900 + tip, seems rationalizable to me, only if she's a clean as you say. Most of the providers I was considering (when I was looking) were in the $250-$450/hr range, some with a 2 hour minimum. But like you, I think I overpay (for strippers) at times. But I'm a stickler for quality. Oh well.

I did not get a chance to reply to your last post but I think in both cases I'd probably choose No. 2. Unless they look older than their age, I'm not as attracted to 19-20 year olds as I am to late 20's and up. I am not flush with cash either so money is a factor for me as well.

I'd still go with #1. Describes my SB exactly, and she's wonderful!

Being skin to skin with a sweet tender tight pink 19-20 yo pussy is one of the best things in the entire world. But I get why the married guys wouldn't do this. I probably wouldn't if I was married. But thankfully I'm not!

Yeah, trusting a 19-20 year old to manage her birth control correctly is a crapshoot (unless you're fixed?)

True. The DS has already gotten pregnant once because she couldn't remember to take a pill. But Im fixed.

Ah. Yeah, the older I get the less I care about STDs, and I can imagine when I'm in my 50s they'll matter less to me. Getting HIV would suck, but honestly even if a guy fucks a HIV+ woman his odds of transmission are relatively low, it's much riskier for women to bareback.

DS1. Not even a tough call.

I would choose #2. For looks to beat out experience, the less experienced woman would have to be at least 1.5 points hotter than the more experienced woman, and this is regardless of cost. In regards to cost I might pay double for a 9.5 over a 7, but the difference between an 8.5 and a 9.5 doesn't rate that high of a premium.

The woman's skills would facter in more on whether I would pay higher than my typical $300 / hr max for a hottie. In fact I based on your description I would likely be willing to pay around 50% higher for number two over number one.

The final consideration is I wouldn't take #1's word that she has seen very few guys and isn't seeing other guys right now. Whores lie, and if she's fucking you, she's fucking other people.