tuscl

Which would you chose (Part 2)

Avatar for JohnSmith69
JohnSmith69layin low but staying high

Which would you chose. These are the same choices as my last post, except I have changed one very important fact.

#1. A young, gorgeous, 9.5 woman who is fairly inexperienced sexually. You have to take charge and direct her, but she will work her hardest to please you and do whatever you ask. You are comfortable doing her bareback because she has only been with a few other guys and is not seeing anyone now. She has one or more genuine orgasms every time you are with her. You are the first man who has ever given her such consistent orgasms.

Or

#2, A somewhat older, attractive 8.5 woman who is an experienced prostitute. She takes charge and has an amazingly array of sexual techniques all of which focus upon the worship and service of your penis. She never has an orgasm with you, but she will fake it if you want her to. She uses her experience to her full advantage but you can only fuck her covered because she's been with 100s of guys.

Both DFK, and both will do bbbjcim.

#1 is DS1 and 2. #2 is GingerBread. I described them accurately except the last time I said one thing that is factually inaccurate. For the sake of discussion, I said in the last post to assume that they cost the same. In truth, I pay #1 double what I pay #2.

On the last post, almost everybody chose #1. Would you still chose #1 if you had to pay her 2X your usual OTC rate? Or would you chose #2 if she just costs the standard OTC rate.

Obviously I've decided that #1 is so amazing that I'm willing to pay double for it. What do you chose?

Comments

last comment
Avatar for rockstar666
rockstar666

I can't deal with sexually inexperienced women no matter how beautiful they are. Give me the best sex partner every time. But I also hate condoms so that's a tough call. I suspect the pro can make up for the need for protection.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for Dominic77
Dominic77

I would pay extra for the cleaner (STI-wise) girl. That's the agreement I have with the wife -- if I ever need to pay an escort for FS or pay a dancer for P4P -- she wants me to pay extra for a clean girl, full stop. So I would go with #1.

Personally for you and given the emotional attachment you seem to have for these DSs over time, I would have you consider #2. It might be healthier emotion-wise to source it from a professional who will keep it professional. Gingerbread sounds like an awesome provider. That my 2¢.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for crazyjoe
crazyjoe

More experience fot hald the price

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for crazyjoe
crazyjoe

For half the price

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for JohnSmith69
JohnSmith69

77, I enjoy both so I do both. But if I had to choose obviously I'd go for 1. But I'm only in love with DS 1, not DS II.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for shailynn
shailynn

I'd probably go for #1 but the price would at least be a little consideration. Like if #1 was 1,000 and #2 was 500 versus is #1 was 400 and #2 was 200.

I usually like to work with low volume providers, well at least ones that I "perceive" to be a low volume provider. How the heck can I know what these girls do when I'm not around.

Lastly you have a connection (at least on your end) with #1 and to me that would be worth the extra money. I've had connections with 7s that I would choose over a 9 that I had no feelings for (other than thinking she's hot).

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for shailynn
shailynn

Crazyjoe would take number 5 and juice would take a 6 piece of chacken fangers with some bbq sauce.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for warhawks
warhawks

^^^
And he'd definately super size it.... and to go.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for JamesSD
JamesSD

Why choose? Variety is the spice of life

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for Subraman
Subraman

I wouldn't necessarily choose either, both sound like they could be fun. But if I HAD to choose one, with no delta in cost, it would be #1 easily.

Okay, now it's "#1 costs double #2", what now? For me, it depends on total cost. If #2 costs $150 and #1 costs $300, I'm down with #1. If #2 costs $250 and #1 costs $500, then #1 has passed my threshold, and what I'm really doing is going out to find a new #1 who I can talk down in price

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for Dominic77
Dominic77

69: Thanks for the clarification. 2x for #1 still sounds OK to me. I'd only tap #2 is no cleaner options existed. But if she's OK for you, then tapping both sounds like a winner. Man R U living the life or what?

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for JohnSmith69
JohnSmith69

Subra, unfortunately my #1s are past your threshold. But maybe somebody who doesn't overpay strippers for sex could get a better deal.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for Subraman
Subraman

I am aspiring to reach your level of overpaying, but I am going to have to level-up a few times to get there :)

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for Clubber
Clubber

OK, the truth just can't stay in me. Below is the picture showed me of DS and himself. The other guys took the payoff to keep quite, but I have my scruples.

elysianhunter.wordpress.com

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for Corvus
Corvus

Ok, John, I have an option for you. In order to truly and accurately answer your question, a question you obviously need an answer to, here is my solution. Only because I have decided to assist you in anyway possible. Set it up for me to have a romp with both of these fair ladies, at your cost of course, and I will be able to make a professional, scientific decision and you will have your answer. Normally in scientific research it is optimal to conduct repeat tests, but for the sake of your delima I think two romps with each lady would be sufficient. Just let me know when and where.

Happy to help you out with this. It's the least I can do for such an esteemed fellow TUSCL monger. And remember scientific research always gains outside funding. Since this is the question you need answered, you should be that funding source. A final report, with color photos and even video, will be provided at no extra cost.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for JohnSmith69
JohnSmith69

Corvus, don't take this personally, but neither DS would have you even if I paid. They are only whores for me. But you can find your own if you look hard enough.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for Cashman1234
Cashman1234

I'd go with experience every time. There a difference to having to drive all the time to get satisfaction (and paying double) versus having a woman who can make you cum hard and who doesn't need to led by the hand.

It's great to just show up - lay back - and enjoy an expert mouth bring you to an intense orgasm. The experienced whore knows how to handle herself when you get a bit rough too.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for Corvus
Corvus

No problem John, just trying to help you out. And don't worry about me, I have plenty of fun.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for Estafador
Estafador

Condom or no condom is a make or break for me. With my preferences in mind I'd still choose B ONLY because the only chick that gets Bareback'd D is my wife. If I have to fuck A raw, I'd rather not fuck her at all.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for Dominic77
Dominic77

I'm in Estafador's boat too. The only one I fuck bareback is my wife. I'd fuck #1 covered. It's sort of like buying expensive Scotch when diluting it with soda water, but, whatever.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for Dominic77
Dominic77

If #1 is within $450/hr, then 2 hours with her for $900 + tip, seems rationalizable to me, only if she's a clean as you say. Most of the providers I was considering (when I was looking) were in the $250-$450/hr range, some with a 2 hour minimum. But like you, I think I overpay (for strippers) at times. But I'm a stickler for quality. Oh well.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for rh48hr
rh48hr

I did not get a chance to reply to your last post but I think in both cases I'd probably choose No. 2. Unless they look older than their age, I'm not as attracted to 19-20 year olds as I am to late 20's and up. I am not flush with cash either so money is a factor for me as well.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for HungryGiraffe
HungryGiraffe

I'd still go with #1. Describes my SB exactly, and she's wonderful!

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for JohnSmith69
JohnSmith69

Being skin to skin with a sweet tender tight pink 19-20 yo pussy is one of the best things in the entire world. But I get why the married guys wouldn't do this. I probably wouldn't if I was married. But thankfully I'm not!

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for JamesSD
JamesSD

Yeah, trusting a 19-20 year old to manage her birth control correctly is a crapshoot (unless you're fixed?)

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for JohnSmith69
JohnSmith69

True. The DS has already gotten pregnant once because she couldn't remember to take a pill. But Im fixed.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for JamesSD
JamesSD

Ah. Yeah, the older I get the less I care about STDs, and I can imagine when I'm in my 50s they'll matter less to me. Getting HIV would suck, but honestly even if a guy fucks a HIV+ woman his odds of transmission are relatively low, it's much riskier for women to bareback.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for skibum609
skibum609

DS1. Not even a tough call.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for rl27
rl27

I would choose #2. For looks to beat out experience, the less experienced woman would have to be at least 1.5 points hotter than the more experienced woman, and this is regardless of cost. In regards to cost I might pay double for a 9.5 over a 7, but the difference between an 8.5 and a 9.5 doesn't rate that high of a premium.

The woman's skills would facter in more on whether I would pay higher than my typical $300 / hr max for a hottie. In fact I based on your description I would likely be willing to pay around 50% higher for number two over number one.

The final consideration is I wouldn't take #1's word that she has seen very few guys and isn't seeing other guys right now. Whores lie, and if she's fucking you, she's fucking other people.

0
0

Log in to vote

Want to add a comment?