To all the steak connoisseurs (and even casual diners out there): Has the premium price you've paid at a high end steak restaurant (Ruth Chris, Mortons, Shulas, Capital Grill, equivalent local only places, etc.) been worth it to you ? Secondary question would be your favorite chain or local only restaurant.
My answer: I'll qualify by stating that I'm not a full blown connoisseur, so please take my comments with a grain of salt. Speaking solely from a steak enjoyment POV, I'd say it's worth it only if you get the thicker cuts of steak. Cuts like New York Strip or Ribeye you'd do just about as well at an Outback for half the price. There is more to a dinner than just the steak. Although the sides are pricey, the portions are much larger too. If you go to a place at least a few times, the complimentary after dinner nightcap is a good touch too. If done solely as a bottom line number crunching excersise, the answer would be nay. I'm not a money no object kind of guy, but if one spends a lot of time on the road, and had your fill of Dennys, hotel chain food, etc, there have been those times I've said "screw it, life is too short, I'm getting a treat this time." With very few exceptions, I haven't regretted my decision. One could apply this thinking to stripclub VIP room vs regular dances, etc. Or buying a car a notch or more above a used Honda Civic. Your thoughts...........


Call me an unsophisticated country hillbilly but I'll take Outback over Ruth's Chris. IMHO, the steak is better at half the price.
I would like to try some place like Peter Lugers. Those that have been there say it's definitely worth the ultra high price.