Just watched the movie. Surprised that the lolita in the film was actually only 13. Ever find yourself looking at a beautiful really young girl running around in shorts? Yes, cute is cute, but some girls put off a more mature vibe. A 12 year old friend of my niece sat in my lap once, and I quickly got up. I was a little disturbed because she actually looked sexy. And the girls at the beach? I think half the girls I looked at were under age. Oh well, nothing wrong with looking, I guess.
Lolita
comments (11)
Jump to latest@mikey - might be best to just turn yourself in now
@Steve...just watch the movie. It's great......and I am no James Mason
mikeya02 - you are referring to the 1962 film. The 1997 remake was much better because the censors didn't put the kibosh on a lot of scenes.
It's no use, he sees her He starts to shake and cough Just like the old man in That book by Nabokov
And then there's the actress Camren Bicondova, who portrays a teenage Selina Kyle (the future Catwoman) in FOX's Batman prequel series Gotham. She looks like a young Michele Pfeiffer, and I figured it was one of those young looking 20ish actresses playing a teen deals, so no harm lusting...then I read she actually is like 15, oops!
13?
12 or 13? Hell no. Maybe it would be better for all concerned if you refrained from sharing that little tidbit.
mikeya02 or Humbert Humbert?
Good one Farmer.
@Rick... the word I used is "disturbed". Some parents should show some concern about what their girls are wearing.

Got up or got it up? LOL. I hear ya. Just always remember 15 will get you 30 unless you marry her.