Just watched the movie. Surprised that the lolita in the film was actually only 13. Ever find yourself looking at a beautiful really young girl running around in shorts? Yes, cute is cute, but some girls put off a more mature vibe. A 12 year old friend of my niece sat in my lap once, and I quickly got up. I was a little disturbed because she actually looked sexy. And the girls at the beach? I think half the girls I looked at were under age. Oh well, nothing wrong with looking, I guess.
Comments
last commentGot up or got it up? LOL. I hear ya. Just always remember 15 will get you 30 unless you marry her.
Log in to vote
@mikey - might be best to just turn yourself in now
Log in to vote
@Steve...just watch the movie. It's great......and I am no James Mason
Log in to vote
mikeya02 - you are referring to the 1962 film. The 1997 remake was much better because the censors didn't put the kibosh on a lot of scenes.
Log in to vote
It's no use, he sees her
He starts to shake and cough
Just like the old man in
That book by Nabokov
Log in to vote
And then there's the actress Camren Bicondova, who portrays a teenage Selina Kyle (the future Catwoman) in FOX's Batman prequel series Gotham. She looks like a young Michele Pfeiffer, and I figured it was one of those young looking 20ish actresses playing a teen deals, so no harm lusting...then I read she actually is like 15, oops!
camrenbicondova.com
Log in to vote
13?
Log in to vote
12 or 13? Hell no. Maybe it would be better for all concerned if you refrained from sharing that little tidbit.
Log in to vote
mikeya02 or Humbert Humbert?
Log in to vote
Good one Farmer.
Log in to vote
@Rick... the word I used is "disturbed". Some parents should show some concern about what their girls are wearing.
Log in to vote