Poll: Which is a bigger threat to end extras in strip clubs?

avatar for steve229
steve229

a) The coming Ebola pandemic

b) The coming economic boom

17 comments

Jump to latest
avatar for jerikson40
jerikson40
10 years ago
Wow. Great topic.
avatar for jackslash
jackslash
10 years ago
c) Ugly strippers
avatar for motorhead
motorhead
10 years ago
d) The aging Baby Boomer population will drive up the demand for health care workers (i.e. nurses).
avatar for SuperDude
SuperDude
10 years ago
e)lesbian strip clubs.
avatar for mikeya02
mikeya02
10 years ago
^^^^^ Unfortunately, there sure seems to be a lot of male nurses
avatar for steve229
steve229
10 years ago
On the bright side, the threat of Ebola or the thought of having to sponge bathe elderly baby boomers may cause some strippers to defer/drop out of nursing school, helping to alleviate the coming stripper shortage to some degree
avatar for mjx01
mjx01
10 years ago
f) foreclosure by our Chinese creditors
avatar for mikeya02
mikeya02
10 years ago
F) The emerging movement called The Christian Army for Baby Jesus......

After they crush ISIS, they will clean up the strip clubs
avatar for crazyjoe
crazyjoe
10 years ago
H) people saying too much on tuscl
avatar for Clubber
Clubber
10 years ago
Bottom line, neither is likely in the near future. The latter, never happen till the beginning of 2017.
avatar for Clubber
Clubber
10 years ago
Per a post, October 6, 2014 • Let me put it this way. According to WHO data, between 1976 and 2012 there were 2387 case of ebola and of those, 1590 were fatal. Over 7 BILLION in the world today, aaaah, I don't think I'll worry much. Really, one of 0.000000341%?
avatar for san_jose_guy
san_jose_guy
10 years ago
I don't think any economic boom will reduce "extras". I think some basic lines have been crossed about that and there is no turning back. Dougster called it "whorification". So more cash in some hands will only increase the "extras" providing business. It is previous so called booms which created this 'extras' situation anyway.

These booms, really just bubbles and gambits, only help some people. So there will be neighborhoods which don't get upscaled and there will be people, some of them women, who still have not. If there is a boom, then it is the boom in P4P sex.

It is hard to stop economic crashes. But it is possible to decline to feed, or boost for, the booms. This is what I do.

SJG
avatar for steve229
steve229
10 years ago
"I don't think any economic boom will reduce "extras". I think some basic lines have been crossed about that and there is no turning back. Dougster called it "whorification". So more cash in some hands will only increase the "extras" providing business. It is previous so called booms which created this 'extras' situation anyway."

@SJG - elegantly reasoned, as always, sir. However, I'm curious about you referencing Dougster, as I believe you have misunderstood and/or misrepresented his position. He is, after all, the main proponent of the theory that the economic boom will result in the "de-whorification" of strippers, as "extras" dancers become "clean" dancers or exit the Industry altogether in favor of becoming full time nursing students, real estate agents or cocktail waitresses.

What are your thoughts in that regard?
avatar for lopaw
lopaw
10 years ago
"e)lesbian strip clubs."

lmao - yeah that would be the end for you, alright...but MY clubbing would be off the charts in extras!!!!
Hahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!
avatar for Cheo_D
Cheo_D
10 years ago
Biggest threats: Lame music, lame stage dances, cheap customers and idiot management.
avatar for skibum609
skibum609
10 years ago
The economic boom of the early 1990's was the last one this country will ever see. 54 million illegal and legal immigrants since 1990 ended America's good times, as Progressives encourage them to never become assimilated, making us no different than other lands that failed due to ethnic diversity: see, Yugoslavia. Iraq, Spain and soon, Turkey
avatar for san_jose_guy
san_jose_guy
10 years ago
Yes I understand what Dougster is promoting. I do not agree with him. These so called booms are just gambits to concentrate more wealth into fewer and fewer hands. Some other people get taken along with it some, but then they get smashed down hard.

We should not support these so called booms.

The "whorification" Dougster speaks of is clearly real. It is the result of economic changes, the destruction of the working class and lower middle class, and in changes in attitudes about sex. It is here to stay.

SJG
You must be a member to leave a comment.Join Now