I like to have the option to be able to make omments on reviws...it would help in creating local discussions with local clubers and about the clubs them selves...
Exactly, along with a ton of meaningless shit, accompanied no doubt by slanderous comments about people working at the clubs, explicit comments about services rendered and by whom, guys taking issue because they didn't like how their clubs were portrayed (whether deserved or not), etc.
IMHO reviews should stand on their own. A savvy reader can generally tell which reviews look credible and which are obviously crap and there is a flag function to handle the truly ridiculous stuff.
Club discussions were useful for clubs that had active discussions. For others you often didn't check to see if someone posted something new because there was no way to tell without clicking on it and more often than not, there wasn't. I would like club discussions with something like a date of last comment posted on the club review tab so you could know if something new was posted.
LOL. A guy who hasn't posted a useful word on this site in 5 years, 44 toilet paper reviews and over 5,000 comments, is calling my stuff crap. Wow. Down is up and up is down in this crazy new world. :)
But hey, i's been fun watching you turn a tip to a bouncer into a gay porn event, along with the other never-ending spinmeister moves that you have perfected during your endless amounts of free time. I have no doubt that your Meals on Wheels delivery guy is also quite entertained by you. ;)
*sigh* I give and give and give and even treat Fraudster like a real person and this is the thanks I get. No good deed...
shark, I don't know. I could see the upside, but after seeing what has happened to the club discussion boards over on SCL I cannot help but wonder if the bad outweighs the good. Anyone who has something interesting to report can always write a review.
Think you've got it a little backwards RickyBoy. I've got many complements and props on my reviews. Yours on the other hand contain none of the type of information that people care most about or could not be obtained from just reading other reviews. Hence your reviews are pure crap and a waste of time to read. Oh, unless you're a gay guy who wants to hear about how the RickyBoy greased a bouncer in the outhouse in Kansas. Not exactly what people are looking for when they read reviews, RickyBoy.
I find it amusing, that a website dedicated to the free sharing of information on strip clubs via reviews, has participants that contribute less than 2 reviews per year of membership, trying to to dictate what should be discussed or what the membership fee should be.
It appears to me, that the model put
forth by Founder is based upon the massess providing reviews for all to see, not to receive fee income from people that don't post reviews.
Or, to put it another way for the benefit of Alucard, we don't care about your opinion, it's reviews that matter.
Meantime txtittyfan likes to inflate his already low review count by posting reviews of the same clubs over and over again. Take away his short re-reviews and his review count/year is not that high either. I think he just keeps posting short, useless reviews of the same few clubs over and over again, because he is to broke to spring for a full membership (as cheap as it is) after all the money he lost shorting treasuries 2009-2012.
If a comment section for reviews and clubs were allowed, that would have to be moderated. There would need to be multiple moderators in order to weed out the shit that is present in the boards over at scl. The club comments section is a mess over there, and I fear the same would happen here.
17 comments
Exactly, along with a ton of meaningless shit, accompanied no doubt by slanderous comments about people working at the clubs, explicit comments about services rendered and by whom, guys taking issue because they didn't like how their clubs were portrayed (whether deserved or not), etc.
IMHO reviews should stand on their own. A savvy reader can generally tell which reviews look credible and which are obviously crap and there is a flag function to handle the truly ridiculous stuff.
"IMHO reviews should stand on their own"
I agree with this one comment.
I agree, I've read yours and they fall under the obviously crap category.
But hey, i's been fun watching you turn a tip to a bouncer into a gay porn event, along with the other never-ending spinmeister moves that you have perfected during your endless amounts of free time. I have no doubt that your Meals on Wheels delivery guy is also quite entertained by you. ;)
*sigh* I give and give and give and even treat Fraudster like a real person and this is the thanks I get. No good deed...
It appears to me, that the model put
forth by Founder is based upon the massess providing reviews for all to see, not to receive fee income from people that don't post reviews.
Or, to put it another way for the benefit of Alucard, we don't care about your opinion, it's reviews that matter.
I sort of agree. It is top notch. Providing people do the opposite of it!
The Prop/Flag “comment†system is pretty much useless from the user’s point of view since one cannot see what it commented via the prop/flag.