reviews

17 comments

• shadowcat

  •

  11 years ago

  That is what the club discussions boards were supposed to be for. Maybe some day Founder will bring them back like he said he would.
• Papi_Chulo

  •

  11 years ago

  Yeah – I think it would be helpful to debunk or give another side to the review if one is familiar with the club.
• EarlTee

  •

  11 years ago

  More flame wars!
• Dolfan

  •

  11 years ago

  I like that idea. I'd even like to even be able to comment on my own reviews, as sort of a followup in lieu of a full blown review.
• endlesstempo

  •

  11 years ago

  You can kind of comment on reviews by propping them.
• rickdugan

  •

  11 years ago

  "More flame wars!" Exactly, along with a ton of meaningless shit, accompanied no doubt by slanderous comments about people working at the clubs, explicit comments about services rendered and by whom, guys taking issue because they didn't like how their clubs were portrayed (whether deserved or not), etc. IMHO reviews should stand on their own. A savvy reader can generally tell which reviews look credible and which are obviously crap and there is a flag function to handle the truly ridiculous stuff.
• Alucard

  •

  11 years ago

  I believe the ability to comment is there. It is called "Prop this Review". "IMHO reviews should stand on their own" I agree with this one comment.
• Dougster

  •

  11 years ago

  RickyBoyDugan: "and which are obviously crap" I agree, I've read yours and they fall under the obviously crap category.
• sharkhunter

  •

  11 years ago

  Club discussions were useful for clubs that had active discussions. For others you often didn't check to see if someone posted something new because there was no way to tell without clicking on it and more often than not, there wasn't. I would like club discussions with something like a date of last comment posted on the club review tab so you could know if something new was posted.
• rickdugan

  •

  11 years ago

  LOL. A guy who hasn't posted a useful word on this site in 5 years, 44 toilet paper reviews and over 5,000 comments, is calling my stuff crap. Wow. Down is up and up is down in this crazy new world. :) But hey, i's been fun watching you turn a tip to a bouncer into a gay porn event, along with the other never-ending spinmeister moves that you have perfected during your endless amounts of free time. I have no doubt that your Meals on Wheels delivery guy is also quite entertained by you. ;) *sigh* I give and give and give and even treat Fraudster like a real person and this is the thanks I get. No good deed...
• rickdugan

  •

  11 years ago

  shark, I don't know. I could see the upside, but after seeing what has happened to the club discussion boards over on SCL I cannot help but wonder if the bad outweighs the good. Anyone who has something interesting to report can always write a review.
• Dougster

  •

  11 years ago

  Think you've got it a little backwards RickyBoy. I've got many complements and props on my reviews. Yours on the other hand contain none of the type of information that people care most about or could not be obtained from just reading other reviews. Hence your reviews are pure crap and a waste of time to read. Oh, unless you're a gay guy who wants to hear about how the RickyBoy greased a bouncer in the outhouse in Kansas. Not exactly what people are looking for when they read reviews, RickyBoy.
• txtittyfan

  •

  11 years ago

  I find it amusing, that a website dedicated to the free sharing of information on strip clubs via reviews, has participants that contribute less than 2 reviews per year of membership, trying to to dictate what should be discussed or what the membership fee should be. It appears to me, that the model put forth by Founder is based upon the massess providing reviews for all to see, not to receive fee income from people that don't post reviews. Or, to put it another way for the benefit of Alucard, we don't care about your opinion, it's reviews that matter.
• Dougster

  •

  11 years ago

  Meantime txtittyfan likes to inflate his already low review count by posting reviews of the same clubs over and over again. Take away his short re-reviews and his review count/year is not that high either. I think he just keeps posting short, useless reviews of the same few clubs over and over again, because he is to broke to spring for a full membership (as cheap as it is) after all the money he lost shorting treasuries 2009-2012.
• Dougster

  •

  11 years ago

  tittyfag: "my financial advice is top notch!" I sort of agree. It is top notch. Providing people do the opposite of it!
• Lionshare

  •

  11 years ago

  If a comment section for reviews and clubs were allowed, that would have to be moderated. There would need to be multiple moderators in order to weed out the shit that is present in the boards over at scl. The club comments section is a mess over there, and I fear the same would happen here.
• Papi_Chulo

  •

  11 years ago

  More info may mean more bullshit – but I prefer more info vs. less – thus I’d would be pro comments section w.r.t. clubs/reviews. The Prop/Flag “comment” system is pretty much useless from the user’s point of view since one cannot see what it commented via the prop/flag.