Best You've Ever Zinged a Stripper
davids
Her: I am looking for a man who will treat me like the princess that I am!
Me: So you're a princess are you?
Her: That's right!
Me: Do princesses typically sell handjobs for $50?
Me: So you're a princess are you?
Her: That's right!
Me: Do princesses typically sell handjobs for $50?
49 comments
P = penis.
$ = no more than $5 bux.
T = Time spent sucking said penises.
B = 1 Gallon buckets.
Solve this davids... How many cocks do you have to cram into "O" in "X" amount of "T" to fill one "B" with the cum you spit up?
Bonus Question: How much "$" will you make?
Call this COCKMASTER MATH
a) she was fat and ugly
b) she gave birth to a subhuman named "parodyman--->"
Here is a direct quote from your original post:
"Her: I am looking for a man who will treat me like the princess that I am!
Me: So you're a princess are you?
Her: That's right!
Me: Do princesses typically sell handjobs for $50?"
So I guess you have been abusive to strippers or you made it up to make it sound like you don't spend your evenings on the couch practicing your HAIRY PALMISTRY. Take your pick numb nuts.
1) The stripper wants to make money. To do so she must approach customers who are willing to spend money.
2) The princess line can be taken as a playful come-on, but can also reveal if a guy is into spending money.
3) By using that, or similar lines she is both introducing herself and setting up a transaction in the future.
There may not have been any deep seated psychological issues other than wanting to get a sense of your spending potential. Now I assuled this was an introduction, mostly since you wouldn't respond when I asked what prompted your insult (you certainly didn't say she had actually offered a handjob for $50, which would be a rather important detail). Feel free to clarify if I don't have the context right.
Notice:
a) Like all women the stripper fantasizes that she is really a princess
b) The woman looks for a man who agrees with this idealized image she has of herself
c) The (asshole) customer clearly does not agree with the stripper's idealized image of herself: What a princess sells handjobs for $50? Sounds more like a prostitue to me.
d) Stripper has got used to customers not beleiving in her fantasy image of herself: When someone buys LDs from her he is treating her as a prostitute, so clearly does not think she is a princess.
So I think the solution is to not treat strippers like they are prostitutes at all by buying dances from them. Rather slowly (so it seems credible) buy into the you're a princess/I'm a prince frame.
Similarly, would a prince pay women from conversation? (I mean a fantasy prince here: there probably are loser real world princes throughout history who have paid for sex/conversation/whatever.)
The more I think/study/experiment with this stuff the more convinced I am that it is strippers in at least as much need of fantasy as customers are (and that, obviously, is saying alot) .
That's right davids, I'm your own personal troll. I'll continually relentlessly ask viscious questions like "Why do you want to insult a stripper? Did she do something to deserve it?" or "Please explain that to me." I'll also offer blistering personal attacks like "That's not true" and "You are wrong about that" without remorse. I'll respond to your arguments with profanity laced insults like "No, actually what I said was..." or "Are you seriously arguing that..."
There is no hope davids. Unless I get bored with you and decide I'd rather surf for porn.
Explain to me, with your vast knowledge of physics, math, and astronomy, exactly why I HAVE to know these things. Also, the Godel thing is another lie. I do know what it is, I just said I have never needed a working knowledge of it, and never will because I am not a theoretical mathmetician. In a very limited philosophical sense it is interesting, beyond that I don't care. Why I should care about an award for work in computer sciences is beyond me, and probably beyond any explanation you can give.
Perfect example. What I said was that truth can not be proven beyond a certain point here. I can say davids eats puppies repetedly, and he can't prove it false. He says I lie, all I can do is say I don't. To a large extent I really don't care what he says because of this, that and the fact that the majority of the board dismisses everything he says or ignores him anyway.
You have been tagged on some easily provable whoppers however. You claimed bartenders were paid based on a salary for instance (and that I was an idiot to think they made their money from tips like strippers), or that one couldn't possibly be a scientist without knowing Godel's theorem (as if you ever displayed any knowledge of it in more depth than is available on Wikipedia). When called on these obvious gaffes you scream "STRAWMAN" and stomp off. Sorry, that isn't logic you are using. In addition you demand a courtesy that you don't extend. The person who throws out the most insults here is you. You claim you only insult people as a response to insults. The problem is that you consider someone telling you you are wrong to be an insult. In many cases it's just plain fact.
PISS, POO, FARTS, ANUS, MASTURBATE