What TUSCL needs

19 comments

• shadowcat

  •

  12 years ago

  I'm sure that every one of us could come up with some thing that they would like to be instituted but until this site gets speeded up at night, does it really matter?
• motorhead

  •

  12 years ago

  ^^^ Yup. SC is on point. Lately the speed is just damn depressing
• JacksonEsskay

  •

  12 years ago

  I've not encountered any issues with slow speeds . . .
• looneylarry

  •

  12 years ago

  Just wondering if it loads even slower on iPhones, since the format was changed to accommodate them. Back to Jackson's original question, shit, maybe I should do some more impressions?
• jester214

  •

  12 years ago

  Then you're in the minority jackson.
• motorhead

  •

  12 years ago

  90% of the time I do use my iPhone so i do wonder if it's the phone so last night I got on my PC with a very fast connection and it was very slow on TUSCL. Def related to time of day. Right now, 6 am in the east, no problem, but in the "prime" evening hours, it can be slow. -- But back to the question. Your suggestions sound interesting, but I'm not sure if grouping the discussions is necessary. I like browsing thru all the topics, so having to look at four categories would make it harder. I (very rarely) visit Stripperweb. They group the discussions. There are positives to groups if you are searching for information, but our discussions here are a lot less "informational", A section for the spam ads here might be useful.
• rickdugan

  •

  12 years ago

  I think that having two different types of club reviews/visit reports would lead to a lot of confusion. I'm also not sure how much value some report of a club drive-by might have anyway if he did not have enough intel to post a full blown review. Now I have mixed feelings about club comments. While in some respects they can add some more color, more often than not they are filled with a lot of garbage. Guys also tend to be too explicit about some of their dicier activities in comment sections. Take a look at the SCL comments and you'll find a lot of BS, shill posts and other nonsense. I don't know, but I think that this place is good as is. I get good information from here on clubs in areas all ovr the country and I don't have to waste a ton of time sifting through a lot of bullshit to get it. On the whole, I thi
• gatorfan

  •

  12 years ago

  I think TUSCL needs a speed up
• xedin5436

  •

  12 years ago

  There's like what, 10 topics a day posted to the discussion boards maybe? If there were 3 or 4 times that amount categories might be useful, but as it is, I don't feel like I'm missing out on anything. Threads generally seem to die out pretty quick anyway, so it's not like I'll really need to go back to find some older discussion for new comments anyway.
• deogol

  •

  12 years ago

  "I think TUSCL needs a speed up" Then it'll get meth-mouth!
• steve229

  •

  12 years ago

  @Jackson - I think you're on the right track. A couple sections you missed: Wanna-be gansta section - all unintelligible posts, or those written in pseudo-rap speak, go here. Also any posts referencing skanky ass 'ho's or farts. Argumentum ad nauseam section - all mind-numbingly dull, repetitive posts go here for ease of ignoring, especially those re-hashing old flame wars or referencing obscure 2+ year old financial trades The OT section is a little too broad. I would recommend you have sub-categories, namely: 1) Cheerleader pictures 2) Mila Kunis posts 3) Other (i.e. unimportant stuff)
• sinclair

  •

  12 years ago

  The biggest problem is too many reviews from people that didn't even go to the club, posting vague garble just to see others reviews. Some gems I saw today: "The drinks were well priced." and "The girls looked good." Very helpful, eh? I am not sure of a way to curb this type of thing with the current membership model of free access with a review or article.
• deogol

  •

  12 years ago

  Well, I suspect a lot of people on here are not professional writers for reviews. There needs to be some slack. There is a way to default questions into the text area for writing a review. So perhaps founder can do that - but the question is: What should the questions be?
• motorhead

  •

  12 years ago

  How 'bout a graphical representation of the 2 AMers? Ya know, like one of those crime maps with the red push pins. I think Texas has pushed Detroit out of the lead with Florida making a good showing too.
• rickdugan

  •

  12 years ago

  "Well, I suspect a lot of people on here are not professional writers for reviews. There needs to be some slack." The issue is not with their writing abilities, but rather with the lack of credible information. One does not need to be Chaucer to write about the number and types of girls, prices (drinks, LDs, VIP/CR), one-on-one experiences, etc.
• Joe from NJ

  •

  12 years ago

  Well I have written hundreds of reviews or maybe just visit reports, but that's what they are. I find both are very useful when visiting a new area to decide what clubs to go to. The visit reports are very useful to pick a club to my liking. What TUSCL needs is a section at the head of each city, with general stiff about the clubs in that area. Las Vegas has a paragraph of exactly what I am saying. I think a city (or area) description could have facts like this is a paste town, or no contact dances in this city only table dances. Or in general this is an expensive town, or this town has fully nude lap dances (Tampa for example).
• JacksonEsskay

  •

  12 years ago

  Joe: Good point. In many areas there local laws are enforced across the board and this can tell you as much as the reviews about what to expect.
• Alucard

  •

  12 years ago

  A way to edit posts to correct typos.
• JacksonEsskay

  •

  12 years ago

  Drac: Amen to that!