tuscl

Move over Texas.

shadowcat
Atlanta suburb
SPRINGFIELD — Illinois lawmakers could vote this spring to impose a “pole tax” — a tax on stripper poles, that is.

Under legislation pending in the Illinois Senate, operators of adult entertainment facilities would pay a $5 fee to the state for each person who enters their establishments, with the proceeds going to fund rape crisis centers and other sexual assault assistance organizations.

State Sen. Toi Hutchinson said it didn't take long for a lobbyist representing strip club owners to contact her after she filed the proposal.

“I knew it was going to be provocative,” the Olympia Fields Democrat said.

Hutchinson said she has nothing against strip clubs and topless bars but thinks they should contribute to the cause of helping abused women.

“If you're going to sell sex and alcohol, then bad things sometimes happen,” Hutchinson said. “I'm hopeful they'll work with me to take some of the stink off their name.”

Alfred Ronan, who lobbies on behalf of the Illinois Club Owners Association, said the group opposes the legislation.

“What do the clubs have to do with abused women?” Ronan said. “I don't want to make light of it, but we just don't get the connection.”

Illinois is not the first state to look at exotic dance outlets as a source of revenue.

A law similar to the Illinois legislation was upheld by the Texas Supreme Court last year. Officials there say the new tax could bring in as much as $44 million.

Several cities also have discussed imposing a pole tax, including Minneapolis and Phoenix.

It also isn't the first time Illinois has considered taxing adult-related products. In 1997, former House Speaker Lee Daniels, R-Elmhurst, floated the prospect of a special tax on pornographic magazines to raise money for schools. The measure went nowhere.

Ronan said club owners will work with Hutchinson to see if a compromise is possible. But he said it likely would force some smaller establishments out of business if it went into effect.

“It really is about protecting women,” Hutchinson said.


7 comments

  • mmdv26
    13 years ago
    Another tax...
  • bang69
    13 years ago
    enought with the taxes all ready
  • Rod8432
    13 years ago
    This is so NOT about protecting women. It's an illogical an unwarranted intrusion by misguided (likely religiously inspired) do-gooders into my and my dancers' personal affairs. It erroneously conflates sexual entertainment with sexual abuse, and represents a judgment and commentary on my choice of adult entertainment, plus punishment - i.e., Judge, jury, and executioner.

    By this reasoning, society should tax the Catholic church to help pay for all the fucked up adults abused by priests as kids. Society should tax Christian Sunday schools to help pay for college science classes to undo the Creationist bullshit imprinted upon young malleable minds. Society should tax advocates of teen abstinence to help pay for food stamps and ADC consumed by teen moms.

    Oh, but how I could go on. Much better to focus on happy thoughts. Hmmm... maybe a trip to Follies this afternoon is just the ticket...
  • Fenster
    13 years ago
    Right on, Rod. My brother teaches biology at a community college, and once a semester has to chew out his creationist students for rolling their eyes and laughing off "evolution". They just don't get that you can't understand biology without understanding evolution.
  • deogol
    13 years ago
    Tobacco use - good taxes. Alcohol use - good taxes. Gambling was immoral until lotto - tax on the stupid. There is nothing this country doesn't think deserves a tax. The country is bankrupt.
  • sharkhunter
    13 years ago
    Apparently they aren't learning anything. The pole tax in Texas is generating far less revenue than they expected. The bill has a lot more to do with hurting legal businesses and driving customers away. Customers that would have helped generate funds for some women who may one day be on the ropes and take up dancing to get funds. I agree. Enough with extra taxes already. Cut government spending. Cut government employees out. That would save a lot more funds. Governments spending more taxpayer money and increasing the debt hurts the overal economy evenutally when debt loads are really high to start with. Eventually someone with have to pay the piper or default. Greece for instance suffered a 25% loss in economic activity in 2011 since they've been forced to cut back spending to get more loans to pay their debt.
  • sharkhunter
    13 years ago
    On the other hand, Illinois could demand a $100 tax on all businesses in their state for customers to enter the business. Then when all the businesses leave the state or go out of business, they'll only have themselves to blame when they can't pay their bills. Of course if the people keep electing such people, then the people deserve it.
You must be a member to leave a comment.Join Now
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion