Top 10 List

Why not a bottom 10 list and I know which ones to avoid

inno123- It's not rocket science, Tuscl already has the capability that you suggest. Click on "San Diego" under Calif. clubs section- they have some TJ clubs listed. Other cities have same capability, with COI/OC/Valley clubs being listed under Los Angeles, in order of distance from downtown Los Angeles. Ditto for Pasco County clubs under Tampa.

As for pickin the best one in area: How difficult can it be to write down all clubs in area with overall grade of 7 or more, and reading more detailed reviews for such clubs to narrow down your choices? Works for me............

@minnow: What does "write down" mean? :)

Minnow, I wasn't suggesting that is wasn't possible to work around the lack of regional top 10 lists, but part of what makes a good site better is not having to do a work-around to get to what you are looking for.

md- If you've completely forgotten (or never learned) how to write the old tech way (pen and paper), can't help you, bud.

inno- The T10/100 system is an interesting, yet flawed/superfolous system to start with. Why further complicate the issue by creating more workload for founder. Such as choosing how to define a region. Limit it by a certain radius? Some "regions" may not even have 10 clubs worth getting excited about. Even if results were tabulated, many users would still dig further into reviews to cull out the features that are important to THEM ( nudity vs topless, alcohol vs juice bar, private VIP vs open LD's, food service, etc, etc.).

I didn't catch it at first,but how do you know that none of the contributors have been to more than a couple of the top 10 clubs? Did you read the hundreds of reviews on each of the 10 clubs, and check the background of every reviewer? I've been to several of the T10 clubs in different categories. Several reviewers have a diversity of clubs under their belt, if only 1 club happens to be T10, so what??? Non issue, afaic.

@gatorfan- Lol

@minnow. Even if a small number of contributors are very well traveled they are outnumbered by the vast majority who are not.

If Founder did not want to go through the effort of defining wha was a region he could simply define nodes such as downtown Los Angeles. The software will then pick the 100 closest clubs (which it can already do) take the top ten in each category, and then present them in the same manner as the national top 10 is presented now. TADA! Any number of usefull top ten lists with miniscule programming effort. And again, sure you could do the same thing yourself, but what makes this site popular, particularly on mobile devices, is quickly asking the question 'what's the best nearby?'.

thanks guys. I added it to the city pages.

the 10 best rated clubs in a 45 mile radius are displayed. In some cases there are not 10 that meet are criteria.

Founder is such a fuckin baller !

founder goes heavy in the paint !

F - define default listing. ie Atlanta Cheetah is highest rated club but is only #7 on the default listing. Not that I disagree. Cheetah sucks.

Founder dude, you rock, and I really like the implementation of it.

Default listing is simply the way they come out of the database

No sorting at all

The code may need some debugging. The top list for San Francisco only listed three clubs. They were I think the three best, but clearly there are more than thre clubs within 45 miles of SF.