tuscl

Louisville strip bars say no-nudity law could shut them down

sinclair
Strip Club Nation
Tuesday, January 11, 2011 12:40 AM
Operators of adult businesses in Louisville are pinning their last hope on an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court in a seven-year battle with the city over a no-nudity ordinance they say would effectively shut them down. Unless the nation's highest court intercedes, city officials say they'll begin enforcing the ordinance as early as February, effectively ending nude dancing and, eventually, alcohol sales at the city's strip clubs. If that happens, then adult businesses may as well shut their doors, said attorney Frank Mascagni III, who represents Déjà Vu and PT's Showclub, because he said no one is going to go to a strip club to buy an overpriced soda and watch a woman dance in a “G-string and pasties.” “They're going to run all of these businesses out of town,” he said of the city. About 25 adult businesses, including several adult DVD and bookstores, have sued to stop the ordinance, which would eliminate all-nude dancing and alcohol sales, and force club owners and employees to pay licensing fees. Clubs will be allowed to sell alcohol until their current license expires, but they will not be allowed to renew, officials said. The ordinance also would halt touching and direct tipping of dancers by patrons, prohibit lap dances, and enact a 6-foot buffer zone between dancers and patrons, as well as restrict hours of operation and force clubs to make structural changes inside and outside to deter illegal activity. Owners of adult businesses have been battling the ordinance, trying to get the courts to rule in unconstitutional, since the Louisville Metro Council passed it in 2004. They've lost each step of the way, most recently last spring before the Kentucky Supreme Court. Mascagni has until the end of January to file an appeal, and says he'll do so, even as he acknowledges that chances are slim that the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments in the case. Even if the high court decides to hear the case, Mascagni said, that likely wouldn't happen until 2012. City officials, meanwhile, are moving ahead with plans to enforce the ordinance, said Bill Patteson, a spokesman for the Jefferson County Attorney's Office. “The process has not stopped,” Patteson said. Initially, he said, citations and fines will be issued only on violations related to portions of the ordinance that are the easiest to enforce, such as eliminating direct touching and private lap dances. Mascagni said he felt he had to try to fight the new law because he believes Metro Government is trying to legislate morality. “Politicians shouldn't be regulating human behavior,” he said. Metro Council member Madonna Flood, D-24th District, who was one of the sponsors of the ordinance, said it arose from planning and zoning issues with some newly opened adult bookstores in south Louisville and was intended to combat property devaluation and criminal activity. It was not designed to “legislate morality” or shut down the businesses, she said. “They have the right to operate, but I have an obligation to protect property owners,” she said. Mascagni said club owners have indicated to him they would look at the economic impact of the ordinance and consider closing or moving if profits suffer. “I believe the government has the right to regulate industries — we all know civilized society needs rules,” Mascagni said. “My problem with this (ordinance) is the city government is making conduct that is otherwise lawful so restrictive that my companies will have to go out of business.” A letter outlining the guidelines of the ordinance is being crafted, and will be distributed to businesses, Patteson said. Bill O'Brien, director of the civil division for the County Attorney's office, called the potential high court appeal a “last desperate attempt to avoid regulations.” “I really do believe they'll say no,” he said of the Supreme Court. Jim Mims, director of the city's Department of Codes and Regulations, which will oversee enforcement, said he understands some businesses will have to make structural changes to comply with the guidelines, such as moving stages or adding lighting. He said the city will give them 30 to 45 days once they receive the letter to do so. “We will work with operators and property owners to make sure that is the case,” he said. “Our mission is not just to penalize people; our mission is to get these operations in compliance with the ordinance.” Reporter Chris Quay can be reached at (502) 582-4241.

8 comments

  • sinclair
    13 years ago
    They could always just relocate to an outlying suburb or across the river in Clarksville, Indiana. That is how it works in the St. Louis metro area. Missouri strip club laws are strict, so all the clubs are located across the river in East St. Louis, Illinois.
  • nengneng
    13 years ago
    Sounds like Louisville is following Nashville's bigh shut down. Hopefully Indianapolis will stay the same.
  • georgmicrodong
    13 years ago
    I've already heard of plans to move outside the Louisville Metro area, across the river, or farther to the west and south.
  • Moose42
    13 years ago
    Who will think of the exposed boobies?
  • SuperDude
    13 years ago
    One day some retired farmer will get a liquor license for his farm and then lease it to a SC operator who will put up a strip of clubs right off a freeway exit. No secondary effects issues, no neighborhood groups protesting, no school boards claiming that it harms children. I know that I would drive a reasonable distance into rural Michigan, leaving Detroit, if I could get to a friendly club free of these local government hassles. Of course we will need uscale motels for sleeping over when we have had to much to drink==or for OTC. Dancers will be brought in on a shuttle bus, free to find return on the bus or find something to do after their shift. AH, just a fantasy.
  • Sig9601
    13 years ago
    @superdude: There is a very nice club like that in MS just north of Jackson. I don't remember the name but it's right up I55. Found it by accident on a mon night and saw 4 hot, and friendly dancers. Nice place, friendly as hell. If I ever find myself back around there, I would go back to visit in a heartbeat. This is a shame for Louisville. My unit visited Ft Knox for 2 weeks back in 2000. On our 2nd to last night, we came across a strip club that would let in under 21. After 2 weeks of partying everynight we were a bit limited on funds, but 7 or 8 of us pooled our money (about 10 bucks apiece) and two smoking hot dancers put on a hell of a show in the back room. Full on 69 and toys on a rotating bed while half my platoon watched. Great memories! I've driven through a few times since then and always meant to stop there again, but never did.
  • Prim0
    13 years ago
    Yet another case of the "moral majority" sticking it's big nose into other peoples business. Why can't they live and let live? Why can't they understand that there are some of us out there who would like to have a nice looking young lady spend time with us and that there are nice looking young ladies who are willing to spend time with us for a few bucks!? Just because they don't like it, doesn't mean that NOBODY should be allowed to do it.
  • deogol
    13 years ago
    "Yet another case of the "moral majority" sticking it's big nose into other peoples business. Why can't they live and let live?" Because people on this board (and strippers) are silent about their support of clubs like this. Politicians oil the squeaky wheel. If all they hear is "This is an outrage!" then they think everyone agrees.
You must be a member to leave a comment.Join Now
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion