Rotation vs. 'Working the Floor'
reignfire
South Carolina
Monday, November 8, 2010 3:34 AM
Can I just say that hate working-the-floor dancers!!! Overall, WtF dancers are still relatively small compared to rotation dancers, but the numbers seem to be rising, especially at Shadowcat's favorite club. Ideally, WtFs should be older, heavier dancers who really shouldn't get onstage anymore but lately there have been more younger and prettier dancers who now don't get on rotation, I guess mainly because they think they're too goo to dance onstage for a dollar or two. Another reason could be the amount of other dancers on rotation already. Even some older and/or heavier dancers who SHOULD be WtF are still on rotation because that's how they were taught.
I think that all clubs should have a small percentage of WtF on all shifts, like 10-15% of dancers per shift (if that high). As far as who's eligible, the priority should first go to those whose been working at the club the longest. If that is roughly the same, then whomever got to the club first. When the % is filled, then the dancer would have to wait for somebody to leave in order to take their place. I would even go so far as a dancer can work the floor no more than twice a week and the vets could switch WtF days with each other. Either that or increase house fees for WtF or that dancers could work the floor an hour or two before the end of their shifts. What do you guys think?
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
14 comments