Fake or Natural?
I get into discussions all the time with SC dancers about breast implants and tattoos. I dislike both and use every opportunity to reward naturally breasted and tattoo-free dancers by buying lap dances/VIPs and tipping well. I mostly send away the implanted/tattooed ones, and while I do not say why I send them away, I always share with the natural girls why I'm buying their lap dances/VIPs. I hope the positive reinforcement will make them feel better about their natural selves and avoid the knife/needle. I don't know about you guys, I've never seen implants or a tattoo that's ever improved anything. For me, nothing beats the curve and feel of a natural breast, nor the allure of an unbroken expanse of naked skin extending from those lower back dimples (aka thumb holds) clear up to her shoulders while she's grinding on me.I have a hypothesis that most guys do NOT like these alterations, but dancers think they do. And for implants, I think most women get them to look good under sweaters and tight blouses, which is meant to impress other women or make them envious, and not meant necessarily to please guys.
What I'd like to know is, do you like or dislike breast implants and/or tattoos? Nothing scientific here; just wanting to get a general read from my fellow TUSCLers.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
35 comments
Latest
Tattoos aren't my bag. I don't mind a tramp stamp or something small and cute, but girls are getting carried away with large amounts of ink.
However, in a sample of three girls who I knew over a long enough period of time to visit with them before-and-after implants, all three girls said their income increased dramatically after getting the implants. (I realize that might be SS, as it would be embarrassing to say the opposite, now wouldn't it.)
Most of us don't like tats either BUT we would be missing out on some good dances if we passed up all strippers with fakes and tats.
samsung1 - I could tell Brena's breasts were fake from the first picture. Attractive girl, but too bad she had to mess up a good thing. By the way, Kahoots has some kick-ass pictures of the girls; for natural, unblemished beauty, I'd pick Victoria and Shayla - Wow!
As an aside, I find the placement of the tattoos is as much a consideration as their size and content. I an't get past tattoos that intrude into the pleasure zones - on the breasts, into the Y, and on the butt. They're distracting as all get-out, not sexy in the slightest, and who wants to read the name of a former boyfriend tattooed over a girl's pubis symphisis?
The same goes for piercings, by the way. Aside from earrings and a cute bellybutton ring, who decided pierced tongues, noses, eyebrows, lips, and even clits were sexy? Ever crunch your teeth on a nipple piercing?
On a related note, is it seems in the real world (and the escort world, now that I think about it), a naturally-breasted, tattoo-free, modestly-accessorized woman can command a premium. She's sophisticated, worldly, exotic, and most importantly, rare. It's like a mint-condition Mustang or 240Z without all the ground effects, spoilers, and decals guys so often heap on them. The pure form, the original design, is valuable precisely because its integrity is uncompromised. And because we as a species seem so intent on always junking up a good thing (Why did Spider-Man 3 need three villains?), an example of an item in its original, balanced , and beautiful form makes us sit up and take notice.
Indeed, less is more...
Tats don't really affect me one way or the other. The only thing that really turns me off is a black woman who is trying to force the ghetto stereotype.
BTW has anyone seen the woman with the world's largest boobs? I'm not sure if I should be attracted or repulsed.
I've seen too many girls with beautiful little breasts ruin them with those ... things. I actually prefer smaller perky breasts, though I'm starting to appreciate larger ones as long as they're full. Tits as big as your head actually turn me completely off. I'm not lookin for a dairy cow here. I guess they're getting better at it now, but they still look and feel fake. You might look good in clothes, but everyone who sees you naked will go, "oh a boob job". Sure if you got a pair of empty gym socks hangin there you gotta do sumpthin, but even a set of A cups if they're well formed are better than those ... things.
Tattoos? Ya don't paint a mustache on the Mona Lisa.
As for piercings. I guess I should be used to seeing them by now, but on first glance I can't help but go, "what the fuck is that on her face"???
Lately naturals have started to feel strange to me, lol.
Thanks R. Giskard. Every once in a while, a pithy gem or nugget of wisdom emerges from one of these threads. I couldn't have put it better regarding my feelings about inking a tattoo on the canvas of a beautiful woman.
Although I prefer natural breasts, minor surgical enhancements can be fine if done well.
I would not make an issue out of either, because it's not my business.
Fake boobs, some I've seen *look* good, but I've yet to feel a pair of fakes I like. A to C, natural and firm, but not hard, are my favorites.
As for tats, it depends on the mood I'm in. Sometimes I'm in the mood for the rocker chick with the piercings and large amount of body ink. Othertimes I'm in the mood for a tat-free beauty.
I think my issue goes to a deeper, sexual concern. For things that tie to sexual stimulation, such as breasts, vaginas, butts, skin, etc., I respond best to "natural." I think it's a consistent theme for me in that the tug in my pants declines in proportion the distance a woman veers away from a natural (and wholesome?) sexuality. So, in my mind, too much makeup, over-the-top slutty clothing, exaggerated surgical enhancements, tattoos, harsh accents, brusk personalities, etc, nearly always diminish a woman's sexual appeal.
Interestingly, I DO like things that make a woman seem young, fresh, sweet, and kind/approachable. So although not natural on adults, shaved pussies are a real turn-on, as is a hairless body in general). I also like a sweet almost airy voice (but not too childlike), long simple hair styles, and women with blonds/lighter features.
Perhaps all this discussion boils down to a "to each his own" kind of thing, without there being necessarily one generally better way to go than another. So for me, I guess I'll continue rewarding and encouraging natural women, and find comfort in knowing it's a big SC world out there, and there's enough to go around for everyone.
Posted: 09/11/09
I too prefer natural. I do know 2 dancers at my favorite club that have exceptional looking and feeling breasts. They were both done by the same surgeon. I even got any inquiry on here for the docs name. I got it and sent him the name and where he worked. I know one guy on here that paid $5.000 for his daughter to get a boob job. She was not even a dancer. That was several years ago, so I expect the price has risen to $7,000. They need to get redone every 8-10 years. You see a lot of older dancers that never got them redone. (money?)The one favorite was getting hers redone 2 weeks ago. She said that they would be a slight bit bigger but would feel much better. I can't to wait to check them out. Neither overdid it size wise.
As a follow up. I have gotten to check her new boobs and they were just like she said that they would be.
I would like to add that a lot of them get fakes to increase their self esteem. Which means impress men and other women.