tuscl

SEC Ogled Porn As The Financial Crisis Unfolded! So Did You

Friday, April 23, 2010 8:39 PM
One SEC accountant tried to access porn 1,800 times in two weeks, another tried 16,000 times in one month. In another case, an SEC attorney spent eight hours a day looking at and downloading porn— as reported by the Associated Press and ABC News— when his disk drive was full he resorted to CDs and DVDs. Gross. Over the last five years, the SEC has launched “33 probes of employees looking at explicit images,” according to an SEC memo obtained by the Associated Press. The bulk of those cases occurred in the last three years (with 16! in 2008—Bernie Madoff was arrested in Dec. 08), as the financial industry teetered on the brink of collapse. More than half, seventeen of the cases, included senior employees. The memo has led to a gaggle of giggle-worthy headlines like: “Did Porn Cause the Financial Crisis?,” “SEC Staffers Watched Porn, Not Wall Street,” “SEC Was Wanking Off While The Economy Crumbled,” etc.— conjuring images of rows upon rows of SEC computers tuned into porn while homeowners received foreclosure notices and Madoff victims wept. It's certainly disturbing to hear of senior SEC officials perusing porn websites when they had a crisis on their hands, but lets be honest here, are we really that surprised? 70% of all porn access occurs during the 9am to 5pm work day (according to a Messagelabs report), and I'm not just talking about the SEC. The numbers are ugly. Another statistic cited by Michael Leahy the author of “Porn @ Work” is a 2006 report from Comscore Media Matrix: one out of every five unique visitors to porn websites in March 2006 were logging on from a work computer. If the SEC was watching porn while the financial crisis engulfed the country, so was the rest of America, or at least a good portion of it. In fact, when you put it in perspective, 33 cases over the course of 5 years is strangely a small amount for a workplace with 4,000 workers. I'm disgusted, but I'm not raising an eyebrow. To the SEC's credit, it is cracking down on their employees, the SEC uses Blue Coat Secure Web Gateway (the software) and McAfee SmartFilter (the subscription) to automatically patrol their employees internet usage and spokesperson John Nestor said the spike between 2007 and 2008 (2 cases versus 16) could have more to do with the inspector general's more aggressive posture than a rise in impropriety. Several of the offenders have been suspended or dismissed. Here is the regulatory agency's official statement: “As we said when this story was first reported in the media in February, every instance of inappropriate use of the Internet investigated by the Inspector General was detected by the SEC's own surveillance and referred to the Inspector General for investigation. Each of the offending employees has been disciplined or is in the process of being disciplined. Some have already been suspended or dismissed. While any misuse of government resources is always a concern, since February we have further increased penalties. We will not tolerate the transgressions of the very few who bring discredit to their thousands of hardworking colleagues.” Read more: [view link]

16 comments

  • gatorfan
    14 years ago
    amazing timing, this story leaks right after Goldman Sachs is indicted by the SEC.
  • deogol
    14 years ago
    There is a whole lot of incompetence and irresponsibility out there these days.
  • bumrubber
    14 years ago
    You have to wonder how badly run the SEC is, if they never noticed that these guys weren't getting anything done!
  • Dougster
    14 years ago
    gatorfan: Apparently it first came out in February. It's being recirculated now. Wonder if Goldman is behind it? ;-)
  • gatorfan
    14 years ago
    That's what I'm thinking, it's no coincidence they are trying to discredit the SEC. The media is stupid to make this a story, they know they are being played.
  • CTQWERTY
    14 years ago
    Working hard or hardly working seems to come to mind for some reason.
  • mmdv26
    14 years ago
    Porno v. Wall St.; somebody always getting f***ed. Maybe SEC staffers were really just reading GS e-mails. Problems on the porno movie set: performers spending too much time doing e-trades on laptops between scenes.
  • wallanon
    14 years ago
    Laughing my ass off at this one... [view link] The inspector general's report includes specific examples of misuse by employees. A regional office staff accountant tried to access pornographic websites nearly 1,800 times, using her SEC laptop during a two-week period. She also had about 600 pornographic images saved on her laptop hard drive. Separately, a senior attorney at SEC headquarters admitted to downloading pornography up to eight hours a day, according to the investigation. "In fact, this attorney downloaded so much pornography to his government computer that he exhausted the available space on the computer hard drive and downloaded pornography to CDs or DVDs that he accumulated in boxes in his office," the inspector general's report said.
  • Dougster
    14 years ago
    I'm sure this happens everywhere. A real non-story.
  • Slothrop
    14 years ago
    This story is 2 years old.
  • wallanon
    14 years ago
    Yeah, and The Three Stooges are about 80. Doesn't mean you can't laugh when someone pokes themself in the eye or falls down on their ass. Or when some poor slob is so drunk he pisses himself and doesn't realize it. Just recently I was sitting on the other side of a dancer when she asked the guy if he did. Hilarious. But anyway, I'd rather read this (somewhat off topic as it may be) than yet another thread about what pants some noob should wear to the club.
  • MisterGuy
    14 years ago
    "As we said when this story was first reported in the media in February, every instance of inappropriate use of the Internet investigated by the Inspector General was detected by the SEC’s own surveillance and referred to the Inspector General for investigation." Why did these complaints against individual employees need to go to the IG in the first place? Most federal agencies are able to handle these cases, unless they involve criminality, on their own. --------------------------------------------- "But anyway, I'd rather read this (somewhat off topic as it may be) than yet another thread about what pants some noob should wear to the club." LOL...amen to that...
  • Player11
    14 years ago
    What if a guy is in his office, shuts the door, disconnects from the lan, and downloads pics of gals from a flash drive for jackoff?
  • MisterGuy
    14 years ago
    You'd still be using govt./company time & resources (your PC) for things other than your work. Monitoring software that's running over a LAN can kept a cache of what's been going on at your PC while you were disconnected from the LAN, only to upload that info once you reconnect.
  • samsung1
    14 years ago
    None of the SEC employees who surfed the Web for porn at work will be fired At many jobs, employees couldn’t use company computers to search for Internet pornography without getting fired. It appears this isn’t the case at the Securities and Exchange Commission. Despite using government computers to view online porn, none of the 28 SEC workers investigated will be fired, the Washington Post reports. The SEC’s inspector general sent a letter detailing the measures taken against the staffers to Iowa Sen. Charles Grassley. Six were suspended, while others received formal reprimands and warnings. Eight resigned. One accountant who was suspended for two weeks tried to access porn sites more than 16,000 times in one month. Though the investigation dates back to five years ago, most of the searches occurred within the past couple years, while the economy was collapsing. The SEC workers – some of whom were earning more than $200,000 per year – used search engines like Google and Yahoo! to find the Web sites and bypassed Internet filters. Read more: [view link]
  • MisterGuy
    14 years ago
    In fairness, it's pretty standard for the feds to give employees the option to just "resign" instead of facing the music & possibly getting fired. The difference is that the people that resign will just get a "neutral recommendation" in the future from the govt. when they apply for a job elsewhere.
You must be a member to leave a comment.Join Now
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion