The Frankfurt School of Marxism: at work in America
mitciv
To further the advance of their ‘quiet' cultural revolution - but giving us no ideas about their plans for the future - the School recommended (among other things):
1. The creation of racism offences.
2. Continual change to create confusion
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
4. The undermining of schools' and teachers' authority
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
6. The promotion of excessive drinking
7. Emptying of churches
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits
10. Control and dumbing down of media
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family
One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud's idea of ‘pansexualism' - the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women. To further their aims they would:
• attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.
• abolish differences in the education of boys and girls
• abolish all forms of male dominance - hence the presence of women in the armed forces
• declare women to be an ‘oppressed class' and men as ‘oppressors'
Munzenberg summed up the Frankfurt School's long-term operation thus: ‘We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks.'
Sound familiar?
1. The creation of racism offences.
2. Continual change to create confusion
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
4. The undermining of schools' and teachers' authority
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
6. The promotion of excessive drinking
7. Emptying of churches
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits
10. Control and dumbing down of media
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family
One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud's idea of ‘pansexualism' - the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women. To further their aims they would:
• attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.
• abolish differences in the education of boys and girls
• abolish all forms of male dominance - hence the presence of women in the armed forces
• declare women to be an ‘oppressed class' and men as ‘oppressors'
Munzenberg summed up the Frankfurt School's long-term operation thus: ‘We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks.'
Sound familiar?
17 comments
Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
Or to take arms against a sea of troubles,
And by opposing end them? To die: to sleep;
No more; and by a sleep to say we end
The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks
That flesh is heir to, 'tis a consummation
Devoutly to be wish'd. To die, to sleep;
To sleep: perchance to dream: ay, there's the rub;
For in that sleep of death what dreams may come
When we have shuffled off this mortal coil,
Must give us pause: there's the respect
That makes calamity of so long life;
For who would bear the whips and scorns of time,
The oppressor's wrong, the proud man's contumely,
The pangs of despised love, the law's delay,
The insolence of office and the spurns
That patient merit of the unworthy takes,
When he himself might his quietus make
With a bare bodkin? who would fardels bear,
To grunt and sweat under a weary life,
But that the dread of something after death,
The undiscover'd country from whose bourn
No traveller returns, puzzles the will
And makes us rather bear those ills we have
Than fly to others that we know not of?
Thus conscience does make cowards of us all;
And thus the native hue of resolution
Is sicklied o'er with the pale cast of thought,
And enterprises of great pith and moment
With this regard their currents turn awry,
And lose the name of action. - Soft you now!
The fair Ophelia! Nymph, in thy orisons
Be all my sins remember'd.
mitciv, when Texas secedes, whose side will you be on?
Each state has that right.
I've heard differing legal opinions on that. I've heard that Texas is the only one that may, for some obscure reason. I've also heard it is still Constitutionally sound for any state. Are you able to document that "Each state has that right."?
As for Texas, that state is indeed somewhat unique. They consider themselves a "republic" unto themselves, have their own military resources beyond the typical guard and reserve, and I think have specific provision in their state constitution that they are not bound to remain among the United States. It is no coincidence that their state flag is like a single-state redux of the American flag...
And y'know what? You just know there are those who would say that Strip Clubs ARE a source of exactly the kind of corruption-from-within plot alleged in the opener.
And how do you know that "None of the supposed Texas special powers and faculties vis-a-vis sovereignty so far mentioned is in any law or in the documents that annexed Texas into the union, or in the Texas constitution."?
Just wondering what your qualifications are, considering I've heard differently from those that do have some qualifications.
That Amendment has been so grossly abused of late that no State would rightly be held at odds with the Constitution were it to secede. But I hope that does not happen.
In truth, about the only thing the federal government does that is Constitutional is the military and perhaps regulation of intrastate commerce.
"intrastate" commerce is business that is conducted inside the borders of a single state, while "interstate" commerce is business that crosses state borders. you're thinking of the latter, not the former. as for seceding, any state daft enough to do it is going to find, one Confederate politician once described one of their states that thought the Confederate government too "all-intrusive" as being "too small to be considered an individual nation, and too large to be considered an insane asylum", a fair description of things even today.
Texans would no longer be bled to pay for the U.S. empire overseas.
No longer bled to pay for expensive weapons.
No longer required to pay housing, schooling and healthcare of illegals.
IN TEN YEARS TEXAS WOULD HAVE A HIGHER PER CAPITA INCOME AND STANDARD OF LIVING THAN THE UNITED STATES!
NO DOUBT WHATSOEVER!
United States President President Thomas Jefferson: "If any state in the Union will declare that it prefers separation...to a continuance in union... I have no hesitation in saying, 'let us separate.' "
"Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive," wrote Thomas Jefferson, "it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government."
Read more: http://www.good.is/post/most-likely-to-s…
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
A brain fart on my part.
Texans would no longer be bled to pay for the U.S. empire overseas.
No longer bled to pay for expensive weapons.
Yeah, and therefore cannot be defended by u.s. or cannot defend against
u.s. weapons that could easily prevent succession, just like in the civil war.
No longer required to pay housing, schooling and healthcare of illegals.
Yeah, and watch illegals overrun Texas since you don't have the INS to patrol your border for free
IN TEN YEARS TEXAS WOULD HAVE A HIGHER PER CAPITA INCOME AND STANDARD OF LIVING THAN THE UNITED STATES!
NO DOUBT WHATSOEVER!
another Fascist.. the list:
SuperFascist
MisterFascist
thatFascistguy6673
Now if that threat would become real, it might just be the necessary wake up call for the President and Congress to go back to the concept of "by the people", "for the people".