tuscl

AIDS group wants rule requiring condoms in porn

LOS ANGELES — An AIDS advocacy group is calling on California regulators to require the use of condoms in porn films.
AIDS Healthcare Foundation spokeswoman Lori Yeghiayan (yeg-ee-AH-yan) says regulations to prevent the spread of bloodborne diseases in hospitals should extend to adult film sets. The current regulations aren't clear enough.
The group plans to ask the California Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board to make its rules specific to pornography during their meeting on Friday.
Cal/OSHA did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

18 comments

  • Dougster
    15 years ago
    Why? They already require STD tests, and new tests can get the window period for HIV down to 10 days.
  • samsung1
    15 years ago
    apparently porn stars are now considered role models.. If the young people see others fucking without a condom then they will do so themselves
  • Dudester
    15 years ago
    Flat out-people don't want to watch porn where people wear condoms, it's a turn off.

    Being the libertarian that I am, I am sick of someone calling for government regulation of every fucking minute of our lives. I live in America, not socialist island.
  • DickJohnson
    15 years ago
    I would rather they mandate every porn worker wear a clown mask or a homer simpson mask.
  • vincemichaels
    15 years ago
    wow, DickJohnson, that's kinky!! LOL I'll rush right out and buy those!!
  • Clubber
    15 years ago
    Dudester,

    Ah, the United States we knew is not an island, but as for the other part, some are sure trying to make it more so than it already is!
  • gatorfan
    15 years ago
    How many porn stars have contracted AIDS? They mention nothing about the setting an example for society, so it has to be a health concern but if they were worried wouldn't porn stars themselves do something about it?
  • Dougster
    15 years ago
    gatorfan: "How many porn stars have contracted AIDS?"

    It actually looks like there have a fair number. Maybe a couple of dozen or so:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pornographi…

  • gatorfan
    15 years ago
    If it's a significant number then they should make the decision not anyone else.
  • SnakePlissken
    15 years ago
    If this passes, do one thing. Buy stock in European porno companies.
  • Dougster
    15 years ago
    I agree with the consensus here. Despite what MisterGay and (vanquished troll) njcsfan will try and tell you, each individual is responsible for knowing the risk and then acting according to whether they find the risk versus reward acceptable to them or not. No need for state involvement.
  • SnakePlissken
    15 years ago
    "each individual is responsible for knowing the risk"

    I agree Dougster. Honestly, if you're too stupid to realize that banging people without a condom is probably not the best idea, you're so stupid you deserve to die.
  • samsung1
    15 years ago
    snake, what are some euro porn companies available for public investment?
  • SnakePlissken
    15 years ago
    Samsung, I can't think of any of hand, try making some calls to the Frankfurter Wertpapierbörse or Euronext to find out. Just say "I want to buy porn", and they'll probably know what you mean.

    You could also just buy stock in Trojan if the first idea doesn't pan out.
  • samsung1
    15 years ago
    Judge dismisses petition requiring the use of condoms in porn films

    http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-…

    A Los Angeles County Superior Court judge Tuesday dismissed a petition seeking a court order to compel county public health officials to require condom use on porn sets or take other reasonable steps to stem the spread of disease.

    The petition, filed by the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, contended that the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health has "passively observed an ever-growing epidemic" within the porn industry.

    "Words alone cannot fight disease," the petition said. "For over a decade, county health officials have talked, watched, written and analyzed. What county health officials have not done is act."

    Judge David P. Yaffe rejected the petition, noting that the county has broad discretion in how it oversees public health.

    The AIDS advocacy group sued the county in July. The action came weeks after an adult-film actress tested positive for HIV and county health officials released data that showed 18 HIV cases and more than 3,700 cases of chlamydia, gonorrhea and syphilis had been reported since 2004 by a San Fernando Valley-based clinic that mainly serves the porn industry. Adult Industry Medical Healthcare Foundation officials said at the time that the majority of the cases did not involve working adult film performers.

    County officials , saying little investigation was done. Representatives from the public health department declined to comment Tuesday.

    AIDS Healthcare Foundation officials plan to appeal the decision and said they would press for change. "We just hope the county will do the right thing without being compelled to do it by a court," foundation President Michael Weinstein said. "This is going to be a years-long battle and it's going to have its ups and downs, but we know in the end that public health is going to win."

    Since the adult-film actress tested positive, the organization has launched an aggressive campaign for condom use. It picketed outside Larry Flynt's Hustler store, called for a boycott of Marriott hotels for offering condom-free porn, and filed complaints with the state Division of Occupational Safety and Health against 16 California-based production companies that they believe violated workplace laws.

    Last week, the group delivered a petition to the state Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board, asking for a change in regulations to explicitly address adult film production. The petition seeks to require condom use or other methods, including simulated sex acts. If adopted, the regulation would effectively ban "bareback" scenes, or those without condoms, which make up the majority of porn production. The department will review the matter, then make a recommendation to the board early next year on whether the regulations should be amended.

    Current state regulations require employers to protect workers from blood-borne pathogens and other bodily fluids. The law is largely used in medical settings, but the state has used the regulations to cite and fine adult film production companies. Under pressure from the state and in a "preemptive move," the adult film industry's Free Speech Coalition published a draft of its own blood-borne pathogen plan -- a 13-page document that outlines numerous safety precautions but stops short of requiring condom use.

    The coalition has submitted the plan to producers and directors for input, then plans to present it to state regulators and lawmakers. Executive Director Diane Duke could not be reached for comment Tuesday, but said on the group's website that once the plan is accepted by a majority of producers, it will confirm that the industry "already has highly effective risk reduction procedures in place, thus negating the need for legislation."

    "Too many times our industry is regulated without even having a seat at the table," Duke said in the statement. "This time we are building our own chair."
  • how
    15 years ago
    In principle, legislating condom use in sex films should be treated as beyond the applications of US law.

    The porn industry did emphasize condom use in the late 1990s, right? I think it was "Wicked" productions that mandated it for all their projects, while others like "Vivid" merely recommended it. But I would guess that most porn productions these days are not tied to any major company. Anybody with a decent camcorder and DVD burner can crank out such products, if they can pay for the performers.
  • samsung1
    15 years ago
    how, I think you also need some sort of license to legally shoot porn and sell it. I thought about shooting porn with strippers I know but I do not want to have to give out my name and personal info to the government or whatever licensing agency to do so.

    I am surprised we have not seen a lot of product placement ads from trojan, durex, etc. in porn videos.
  • shadowcat
    15 years ago
    I have 161 porno's on my hard drive. They range from 59 seconds to 90 minutes.I have downloaded thousands but only keep the ones I really like. Like every one else I have likes and dislikes. I do not keep any ones where condoms are used. They just make it seem like a commercial production. Yeah, I am kidding myself but no condoms seems more natural.
You must be a member to leave a comment.Join Now
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion