- First Time and Lame Time
I am also entitled, I guess, BubbleYum. I (like many|most of the readers here) infer paid dance value based in large part by stage performance. Dancers who don't take the opportunity to sell themselves for free will attract less customer $.
- Goodtime.
For the less informed, Coronalime is the most informed. He is a key resource for Seattle hobbyists.
He implies that he is naive about P's. Not true, nor true about other key venues in north end of Seattle.
There are chronic reviewers here who clearly don't know the Seattle scene or troll for self-gratification. One self-owns by adopting a diminutive for a name.
- I like them old and dirty. FML.
We who know, know who. Oui!
- Blast from the past.
She did work there before Covid. She's been back for about a year but generally only works 11-3ish on Fridays.
- Another Sunday Fun-Day.
Great review with deeper nuances by name.
We should emulate.
Monse should be a Harvard Business School case study re: success at personal services. I'll bet she makes at least twice as much as anyone else in Seattle (except, maybe, Rio at Kittens) at low prices.
- Went mining for Jade, hit paydirt
FYI: Kendra actually lives in Cleveland and visits Seattle for a couple of weeks about once a quarter. Before her move there about four years ago, she was VERY popular at LCV. Until recently, she would appear there when she visited. Now, it's P's. She is moderate (not high) mileage (e.g., no FIV) but she loves mammary attention. Look for her again in June/July.
- Inflation has hit the clubs.
I suspect corporate profit (or revenue) targets are driving up prices to compensate for reduced visitation. It's a vicious cycle which bean counters don't understand. The change of management at this specific club after Covid has driven many of their best toward other clubs if not off-stage altogether. Kendra (an occasional visitor since her move to Cleveland) is an example of an all-time great who now appears at P's. The former night manager, Gail(?) had created a very nice experience; her successor(s) destroyed it. It is still fairly well attended on weekend nights by non-regulars. High mileage days are dead with "D" being the rare exception. She is typically around on weekdays til 3 or 4. Call ahead to verify.
By the way, if Gail reads this, I would love to hear from her by PM. I believe Amanda would vouch for me.
- Many more new girls
Your effort for discretion is appreciated. However, describing them physically by unique features is probably more revealing than using a stage name which their acquaintances would not know. In addition, you didn't even allude to anything illicit. Prices are well known and not implicating.
- A Unique Experience at Kittens.
Another gratuitous pushback here:
IF one REALLY needs to know details on decor, layout, etc., for a club as frequently reviewed as Kittens (or Pandora's for that matter) scroll back through previous reviews where they are provided, often in excruciating detail. These places don't change often, other than who is dancing and prices. For regulars, and regular readers, carrying on about stages, chairs, etc., is well known and tedious to plow through. Useful content can get lost in the minutia.
In addition, the no-names / no-description protocol may still be pertinent in some places. Not so in Seattle for quite a while. This city has stopped busting sex workers. They focus on pimps and other traffickers, as they should. The special "local" situation in Seattle was covered in some detail a few months ago on the other forum (where details are much more common). Some have suggested that there could be some element of "outing" a performer to friends/family that might be reading this. As we know, their names are almost always fictitious and photos are not allowed so identification in a review is highly unlikely.
I am speaking only about Seattle here, nowhere else.
Caveat: If a performer wants to correct me on this, I am listening. I know some of track this and other forums and so there may be some feedback from someone.
review comment
2 years ago
ThatXGuy is right. Look for my recent comment re Sugars for details
review comment
2 years ago
I met Devious a few years ago. First and only time: I moved to the stage and she did a headstand between my legs so my face was in her crotch. I briefly availed myself. We immediately headed for the LDA. She quoted $50@, no volume discount, saying it was worth it. It was. She was lactating and made that a feature of her lap performance. I have been away but will be able to catch up in a couple months and will definitely try to get on her dance card.
I'd recommend her wo equivocation.
review comment
2 years ago
![]()
SCPI’ll be in the darkest LDA corner…
So, Lola was ejected from Pandora's? Usually, mgt there ejects them for being a drama problem among the dancers or something they can't overlook. That doesn't sound like Lola to ME, but what do I know? So, I'm asking.
review comment
2 years ago
![]()
SCPI’ll be in the darkest LDA corner…
Club_Goer... and ThatXGy are hinting that the Seattle market/industry has evolved such that traditional norms are largely defunct.
Seattle Police Department is not regulating sex industry providers because prosecutors won't waste time on petty prostitution. A few years ago, the city council re-focused toward attacking trafficking and began to regard "providers" as probable victims. Enforcement energy shifted toward pimps who were operating on places like Aurora Avenue (same street as Sugars but further north). They also stepped-up trolling for drive-by Johns who they started prosecuting hard. No more keeping names out of the light. Since then, Covid at first dried up street business but now the strollers are out in force, more than ever, to the consternation of merchants in that strip. The gals may be running more independently now. I'm guessing that if doesn't smack of trafficking, Seattle LE is off the case. That seems to cover all sex workers, including club contractors.
Now, the concern is the club owners trying to stay on the downlow to avoid negative publicity in their neighborhoods. They could still be zoned out of existence (like in Bothel, Everett and Shoreline.
Dancers know they are being described here and elsewhere and no one has asked to keep [whatever] to myself. They seem to feel such salaciousness as word of mouth marketing. Of course, YMMV is always the mantra.
And, as always, Club_Goer_Seattle is one of the few true authorities and can be trusted for guidance.
review comment
3 years ago
IIRC, P's used chips years ago. The ATM at LCDV takes a percentage of your cash draw as their fee, not a flat rate regardless of amount. Always listen to CG: best to bring cash. It can limit the cost of overwhelming lust.
review comment
3 years ago
you're right and there's another one who's been at it for les than 3 momths. 22 & v pretty.
review comment
3 years ago
Thanks for the tip. You may also find Devious on occasion- pricey but high octane.
review comment
3 years ago
Per Diamond: Sat days and Tue or Wed so call
review comment
3 years ago
![]()
drewcareypnwnot the real drew carey, but I play him at strip clubs...
The Sands was usually/always a $40 per place. Historically, it was commensurate with the mileage.
review comment
3 years ago
Ava looks great to me. No apparent COVID effects. However, she has curtailed her menu. She'll tell you that up front.
review comment
3 years ago
The Lady Manager went by “Alex” @ Sugar’s.
review comment
3 years ago
Well, Drew,
You remember Spyder (before the great hiatus)?
She wore a plug and she’d just about lose her mind if you “worked” it for her. All you had to do was put your thumb on it and shake your hand like severe case of Parkinson’s.
So, my take: if she’s putting it in, it’s an invitation. But then, I’m into making HER gasp gratefully.
discussion comment
3 years ago
Before the shutdown, a dancer in N Seattle was wearing one. She liked being/looking "naughty". I discovered that she also enjoyed, A LOT, having it jiggled vigorously. She was rather responsive, generally, but this really seemed to be her ON button. I didn't have time to experiment with extraction/insertion before the club closed. She has married(?), moved and retired, apparently.
So, appearances aside, it may be interesting, all other things equal, to test to see if they actually are an invitation.
discussion comment
4 years ago
Pls excuse my naïveté: what is SA?
review comment
4 years ago
Multiple dancers report that enclosures “like Kitten’s” will be in place soon.
review comment
4 years ago
From her questions of me, I suspect Camille is a good prospect.