Say your in a club that has a lot of average looking girls and most of them wont do any "extras." Then there is a dancer who is f@#$ckin hott as hell and shes the one doing the extras.
There is a bit of received wisdom that attractive women are stuck up and less attractive women are more eager to please, and hence better in the sack. Indeed, it is such a common belief it is almost a stereotype. I think there is some truth to that. But the opposite can also often be true. Better looking people are often better at sex, for the simple reason that they have done it more often and thus have better skills. The best sex I have had, frankly, has been with women who are very attractive. On the other hand, I have slept with not so great looking women who, sadly, did not even know how to give a decent blow job.
Another stereoptype is that older women are hotter, and younger women are too inexperienced to know what they are doing. Again, there's some merit to that, but it's less than 100% true. These days, a lot of younger women, in fact, have loads of experience. The 20 year old I regularly see has been fucking since she was 14, so she's got game. Plus, the younger generation has more quickly gotten into kinkier shit. I'm more likely to get atm with a 20 year old than a 40 year old.
I see the really hot sex workers as analogous to professional athletes. They have a time limited career, and they are going to make the most of it. So a girl with those gifts may be selling it to the max.
Dick, I've never noticed any correlation between how attractive a dancer is vs. how much contact she was willing to allow. I think if there's any correlation anywhere it's with intelligence - the smarter girls know how to make money without going as far. Drug use probably also correlates with how far they will go, but it isn't always easy to know who the drug users are, some of them are very good at hiding their habit. If it weren't for drugs, I'd expect to see some correlation with age too, especially with the women over 35 or 40, but drug use by younger ones probably offsets that.
Well I hate to let the genie out of the bottle, but I have definitely found the more attractive they are the more willing they are to do OTC sex. Also the prices tend to be more realistic too as looks get super high.
Maybe it's something like this: They got to be that good looking for a reason. Or the ones who are attractive are more able to psychologically deal with being whores b/c still know they're hot, whereas an ugly girl's self-esteem could not handle being a whore and not being hot.
Probably the 3rd biggest factor though is how nice they are: The bitchy ones have too much contempt for you and/or themselves to fuck you for money, whereas the nicer ones aren't as troubled by it.
But, and again, I hate to disillusion all the guys here who think they are studs, but the FONDL is right. The number one biggest factor in determining whether they will do extras for money is how badly they need to get their next fix, and you will be surprised by which ones are the most likely to be drug addicts (usually the nice ones.) (For academic completeness ingle motherhood is the second biggest extras determiner.)
Oh, another person who doesn't understand what "correlation" means. It does not mean in every single case. It just means more or less probable. Yes some single mothers and junkies still won't fuck, but if you had to make a bet that's where the smart money would go.
Drugs are a huge factor. One time at the Mons Venus I was bullshitting with some dude outside whilst drinking my 40oz Mickeys and he tells me it took him about an hour to pull this dancer out of the club with the promise of drugs. sure enough she comes out in her tight ass jeans and tube top and off they go.
I might suggest that that same correlation exists with your escort and particularly street walkers. When you eliminate "serious need and addiction" from the equation I would submit that there is an inverse correlation to the guys. Who is doing the asking, how they do it and how they treat the ladies. But then that's no different than the real world except that it's probably easier in the real world. Not as much experience per woman in being propositioned.
Just an after thought, I doubt that there are many, if any, virgin dancers out there so the question is not whether or not they have sex but with whom. The question becomes do you, we, meet the standards of the dancer. Personnaly I'd rather be with the tougher standards than the lady who is doing everyone and hopefully it will worth the challenge. I'll take my chances on that.
Maybe you should ask her. May be alot of deep psycholgical reasons or it could be as simple as she feels they treat her better and she feels safer with them. Anybody's guess.
Yes, my impression is that for someone who goes into a club looking for a stripper who does extras, that would be a big surprise. The far more likely case would be to find that it's one of the average looking girls. Typically, because it's the only way she can make money. The hot as hell girl fares better selling dances.
However, I don't go looking for extras, just good lapdances, etc. For that, I've been making the same points for years that njscfan makes. I've always found that the best looking strippers are the most likely to give the best high mileage dances. They have the natural ability, and, as with people in other fields, they relish putting their gift to use. It seems so obvious to me, I have to think the common expectation of a stuck-up bitch must come mainly from guys who choke in the presence of a hot-looking woman and can only relax around somebody more ordinary.
14 comments
Latest
Another stereoptype is that older women are hotter, and younger women are too inexperienced to know what they are doing. Again, there's some merit to that, but it's less than 100% true. These days, a lot of younger women, in fact, have loads of experience. The 20 year old I regularly see has been fucking since she was 14, so she's got game. Plus, the younger generation has more quickly gotten into kinkier shit. I'm more likely to get atm with a 20 year old than a 40 year old.
I see the really hot sex workers as analogous to professional athletes. They have a time limited career, and they are going to make the most of it. So a girl with those gifts may be selling it to the max.
Maybe it's something like this: They got to be that good looking for a reason. Or the ones who are attractive are more able to psychologically deal with being whores b/c still know they're hot, whereas an ugly girl's self-esteem could not handle being a whore and not being hot.
Probably the 3rd biggest factor though is how nice they are: The bitchy ones have too much contempt for you and/or themselves to fuck you for money, whereas the nicer ones aren't as troubled by it.
But, and again, I hate to disillusion all the guys here who think they are studs, but the FONDL is right. The number one biggest factor in determining whether they will do extras for money is how badly they need to get their next fix, and you will be surprised by which ones are the most likely to be drug addicts (usually the nice ones.) (For academic completeness ingle motherhood is the second biggest extras determiner.)
So funny how you mention the girls drug abuse while "drinking your 40 oz mickey" if its leagal it aint abuse LOL LOL
JOKE BTW!!!!!
However, I don't go looking for extras, just good lapdances, etc. For that, I've been making the same points for years that njscfan makes. I've always found that the best looking strippers are the most likely to give the best high mileage dances. They have the natural ability, and, as with people in other fields, they relish putting their gift to use. It seems so obvious to me, I have to think the common expectation of a stuck-up bitch must come mainly from guys who choke in the presence of a hot-looking woman and can only relax around somebody more ordinary.