I did a couple posts about my experience at the RolLexx and a couple posters thought it should be a review instead of a discussion topic. Well, that might or might not be the correct line of thought.
I was thinking that if I did do a review of the RolLexx, then I'd give it a 10 despite my unpleasant experience on that particular visit. One reason that I'd want to give it a 10 is because I think there is just too much value not to. Tootsies is 5 times more expensive for a shorter song and I think the hottest dancers at RolLexx (when available) beat the hottest dancers at Tootsies hands down. Now, the RolLexx has more ugly (fat) dancers by far; Tootsies has dancers comming out the kazooo and wins that competition without breaking a sweat, but looking at silicone is a turnoff for me and I'd rather look at ugly (fat) if forced to choose. Another reason I'd want to give the RolLexx a 10 is because I don't believe in rating by numbers; the description is what should be important. I love short, slim, small girls. The next guy may love tall, blonde, and silicone. I rate "value" i.e. $5 very highly. The next guy may view a $100 as being equal to a penny or less in his budget. ETC. ETC. ETC.
I assume a majority of you would have problems with my rating the RolLexx a 10 considering that I had an unpleasant experience. Am I correct? :)


jablake,
No problem with the cost, but in my case, the talent could not possibly be at the RolLexx. That said, I've never been to the RolLexx nor the newest Tootsie's. I am basing this post on what I know of you and your likes and dislikes.