Kamala's Big-girl Interview
misterorange
America has been waiting over a month for something she should be doing at least a couple times a week. Well, it's finally here.
Her campaign shopped around for "journalists" the way a movie producer conducts a casting call. And on top of that, it's pre-recorded, most certainly edited, and the potential "first female President" couldn't do it without a man by her side (albeit one of questionable masculinity). Jesse Watters said it best, "With all his gesticulations, he looks like the next contestant on The Price is Right. Come on down!"
Well, I've never seen a horse-face jackass interview a pile of dogshit before, so I suppose I'll watch it. 9PM on CNN. Enjoy the show.
Her campaign shopped around for "journalists" the way a movie producer conducts a casting call. And on top of that, it's pre-recorded, most certainly edited, and the potential "first female President" couldn't do it without a man by her side (albeit one of questionable masculinity). Jesse Watters said it best, "With all his gesticulations, he looks like the next contestant on The Price is Right. Come on down!"
Well, I've never seen a horse-face jackass interview a pile of dogshit before, so I suppose I'll watch it. 9PM on CNN. Enjoy the show.
Comments
last commentI'm interested to see how she disavows her past advocacy for: race reparations, not just single payer but making private health insurance illegal, defunding the police, abolishing ICE, banning fracking, and forcing the economy to go all "green" long before it's ready. Pardon me for not believing recent conversions out of convenience.
She's already telling concerned donors "don't worry about price controls, they won't pass anyways."
She's faker than Pam Anderson's tits. And for being this girl power trailblazer she can't even take questions alone. LOL!
This is a joke. She needs to do spontaneous interviews with several different outlets both Left & Right. And more than 1 debate with one being like Fox or similar.
Bite it Harris.
Think of the most liberal person you know. That is your average person in media.
When did Harris propose price controls ?
https://www.usatoday.com/story…
Here's the walk back
https://www.politico.com/news/…
Here's another reliably liberal paper saying the same, and that it sucks.
https://www.theatlantic.com/po…
Just quote the sentence that shows Harris proposed price controls.
No, we have full brains and recognize that you are the last one on either side of the aisle who can't acknowledge that.
While you're at it, look up the definition of price controls.
@sfrsox - not the topic of this thread. Focus.
I don't blame her for wanting to walk back this and the rest of her far left platform, hiding behind "joy" and "vibes," and not taking interviews without her emotional support white male... because if her radical views were known, she wouldn't win a hundred EVs.
"Price controls are restrictions set in place and enforced by governments, on the prices that can be charged for goods and services in a market. The intent behind implementing such controls can stem from the desire to maintain affordability of goods even during shortages, and to slow inflation, or, alternatively, to ensure a minimum income for providers of certain goods or to try to achieve a living wage. There are two primary forms of price control: a price ceiling, the maximum price that can be charged; and a price floor, the minimum price that can be charged."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
Harris never said it. She has only painted broad strokes to address price gouging, which could take many forms. We haven't seen details yet, so nobody can say exactly what it will be.
Misterorange and Puddy Tat are therefore either incredibly gullible MAGA dupes, repeating false statements from the Trump campaign, or intentionally lying to deceive others, which is pathetic. So which is it ?
Vote D
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
Vote D
She said she'd bring down food costs (2% profit margin, right) and make housing affordable, that means price controls. If she does "Tax Credits" that's printing money which will stoke inflation as she and Biden have done the past 4 years. Will she lighten regulations? Dems never saw a chance for a regulation they didn't like - the more the better.
She said her "Values have not changed". That speaks volumes. She's never had to run for office, sure, as a Dem in CA which is a no-brainer. The only time she had to run against real opponents was in 2019, and she was the first to drop out with ZERO Delegates. Then through the magic of DEI she became VP - DEMS DIDN'T EVEN WANT HER and yet here we are.
She'll have plenty of time create many Word Salads for dinner. She was way too prepared; CNN gave Clinton the debate questions in 2016. Today, either CNN gave her the questions before or her staff gave CNN the questions to ask.
Like she had all these people at her house, like Hillary making cookies, and Biden called. That response was so phony Holden Caufield would have called her the Phony Idol.
And BTW, it's been well documented that government spending was a factor which made inflation worse, but it was not the main driver of inflation.
On the emergent sub-thread- wld4cocks is being willfully ignorant as always. Don't waste time because he refuses to listen or quit while he's behind.
Be presidential and sit down in a live interview with cold questions from an unbiased interviewer
It was as if there was a teleprompter hidden from the camera's view. Which would mean the questions were not only provided in advance, but the answers were researched and written out. If Dana Bash had any credibility at all before this bogus fucking production, she's got zero now. But that's just fine for CNN. Their audience doesn't care about or expect credibility from them. In fact, I'm not sure they even know what it means.
Back when slick willy was running then elected prez cnn was noted for the kid glove treatment that they gave him and his wife to the point that they were called the clinton news network.
Nothing's changed over the years except that they should consider changing their name to knn, kamala news network.
Also it's not surprising to see that delusional ball sucking leftist shill POS wild4testes outright lying as he always does in his attempts to promote the controling commie agenda being forced on America.
California is such a melting pot, I never thought they had a distinct dialect. But I remember when Barry Bonds played for the San Francisco Giants he was criticized for sounding aloof. And one linguist said - no, not really, that just typical of the Northern California dialect.
‘The only correct reaction to anything is overreaction ‘
@mogul “This is CNN who gave HILLARY the debate question in 2016 when she debated Trump.”
Are you talking about when the questions were given to Hillary’s campaign ahead of the primary debate with Bernie? I’m familiar with that incident. I’ve never seen anything that said she got questions ahead of a Trump debate, but it’s been 8 years. Have a cite by chance?
(Single most "get off my lawn" energy here, PMs asking to take his side in beefs here, and taking personal offense when someone calls him out.)
Touch grass.
Lulz.
BTW anyone who uses touch grass as a way of expressing their opinion is probably opinionated in the extreme.
I'm a big boy, I can deal with contrary political opinions, which weren't even my point, it's with derailing threads because you can't let each other be for five seconds.
Oh and yeah, Gamma is correct here on politics. Don't like, got l you and @wld4tatas can cope together. But at least he comes off as someone who doesn't live for feuds here.
Lulz.
Not just "spending", giving away money that people became dependent on that caused supply (not enough)/demand (too much). And Supply was hampered by gov't spending that also caused shortages that drove demand and prices. The cost of energy effected everything across the board.
You forgot Trillion Dollar budget debt spending on worthless projects, and gov't employing over 50% of jobs.
Puddy Tat has been trying to help you, as well, pointing out how you seem to live for feuds on here. You never offer much of substance on any topic, and lash out whenever anyone offers a differing opinion. Even when occasional allies disagree with you on Trump, no matter how much they have voiced their hatred of Trump, you immediately begin spamming and name-calling.
That behavior, the inability to even hear an opposing opinion, belies your biggest problem - small dick energy. You have so little self-confidence, it cannot even be measured. You attack anyone who disagrees, you lie constantly, you contradict yourself daily, and you DM others and try to drag themselves into the feuds you are constantly starting.
You should take step back and really evaluate everything you want to say anytime you want to make a post. Ask yourself, "Is this coming from a place of wisdom, or a place of fear?" "Am I bringing value to the conversation, or am I doing this for myself?" Either of the latter answer is the truth of a troll.
I am offering you this advice on the off chance that you may want to receive it as an adult. None of this is meant as an attack. Please put aside your defensiveness and really examine your behavior on this board and the negative energy you bring to nearly every interaction. The entire board looks at you as a small-minded, spiteful, bitter old man who would rather burn bridges than build them. If you want to make a meaningful change in yourself for the better, with what little time you have left on Earth, you should start here since you spend most of your time here. Be better. God bless.
What a dope you’ve used up your allotted time with me today, maybe I’ll smack you tomorrow but today’s lesson is over.
Do something fun for the rest of the day, I’ve got better things to do with much better people.
Also twentyfive is one of the few or perhaps only practicing Jewish member on the forum so for you and gammanu to attack him comes across as anti semetic my friend. Plus isnt he nearly twice your age? If you were saying any of this stuff to him in person he would give you a whooping single handedly.
Finally he appears to be an old school classical liberal, which isnt that much different than being conservative. You probably agree on much politically
She needs to do multiple 45-60 minute interviews like Trump is doing with greatly different people and organizations. The one interview, and an offer was made weeks ago, is one with the All In podcast - it has the largest global podcast, and the 4 guys are from Silicon Valley and not exactly Right Wingers. Trump did 55 minutes. All In is not anywhere near Fox, Rogan or the MSM.
As far as the Harris "interview" last night, I still contend her crew or CNN provided questions/answers, and she had crib notes to refer to the way she glanced down (we never saw the table) when asked about policy, her phrasing never changed and she did ask for note cards for the Trump debate.
When she was asked about personal stuff, that I could careless about, she would look Dana Bash in the eye with no problem. Looking down show she is searching for the the "right" thing to say or to reference notes. Look at the interview Trump did on 60 Minutes or with Phil McGraw - siting in an open chair, no table, just talking.
In 2020, America was told and sold that Biden was a "moderate" unifier. Sure, he probably is, however, we can see today and the past 3.5+ years he was just a Tool and Cog in The Dem Machine being told by Obama's crew (we know they are in the Executive Branch) what to say and do. And Harris supported him 110%, and she lied, and continues to, regarding Biden's mental capabilities. They fall back on "age" as the can apply that to Trump too, but not Pelosi or Bernie?
What were are seeing with Harris/Walz is how Venezuela was seduced by Hugo Chavez and the Bolivarian Revolution in 1999 with a new Constitution replacing the one from 1961. VZ was once the Pearl of South America with a very high standard of living. Voters, like those who supported Castro and Che in the 1950s, believed in Chavez and VZ turned into a shithole country. With Harris/Walz, and Obama's Marxist Ideology, we would continue down that path. We just need to also look at CA, NY, IL to see what hardcore Democrat Super Majority Control can do.
How is this "anti-Semitic"?
This literally is how these interviews have gone as long as there has been Television, for both sides of the aisle.
Not true, for years the left leaning msm has treated the left much more favorably than the right. That's a fact. Any other outlook is just plain wrong.