Kamala's Big-girl Interview

Biggest bullshit "interview" I've ever seen. Saying this now 20 minutes into it, so you liberal fags don't say I'm taking cues from Fox News. Even a moron will tell you this is a total fucking con job.

She clearly had time to prepare and rehearse her responses. They were too perfect for her. This is CNN who gave HILLARY the debate question in 2016 when she debated Trump. This “interview “ was presented as “live” when it was recorded.

This is a joke. She needs to do spontaneous interviews with several different outlets both Left & Right. And more than 1 debate with one being like Fox or similar.

Oh my, she just needs her Safe Space. Trump does all kinds of interviews with all political sides ALL THE TIME.

Bite it Harris.

I saw Scott Jennings from CNN called Tim Waltz Kamala's emotional support animal, that's funny as hell

At the end of the day. You want to be the president you can't be scared of media, especially media that really totally on your side to begin with.

Think of the most liberal person you know. That is your average person in media.

She was doing a "puzzle" with her neices when "Biden called to tell her" that he was stepping aside. 1) I'd bet my life against a shot of halfway decent bourbon that never happened. He didn't call her. Someone else did. And 2) WHO THE FUCK does puzzles anymore.

She's already telling concerned donors "don't worry about price controls, they won't pass anyways."

When did Harris propose price controls ?

@wld4jizzinhismouth - m.youtube.com Even CNN said it, so it MUST be true.

None of those show Harris proposed price controls.

Right. Only 12 of her staffers put that out. Her campaign said it. I guess that's cool with you. Nobodies speaking for the person in charge.

Nope that one doesn't either. Just quote the sentence that shows Harris proposed price controls.

Any of you with half a brain have already realized you have lost the argument big time. The only question is will you admit it, or will I have to expose how gullible you have been.

How many billions did the Orange Idiot get from Daddy and still end up bankrupt?

^^ I'm still waiting for that quote, which I know you are frantically searching for now.

While you're at it, look up the definition of price controls.

Is that all you got? Seriously ?

From Wikipedia

"Price controls are restrictions set in place and enforced by governments, on the prices that can be charged for goods and services in a market. The intent behind implementing such controls can stem from the desire to maintain affordability of goods even during shortages, and to slow inflation, or, alternatively, to ensure a minimum income for providers of certain goods or to try to achieve a living wage. There are two primary forms of price control: a price ceiling, the maximum price that can be charged; and a price floor, the minimum price that can be charged."

en.wikipedia.org

wld4horsecockupyourass you obviously never took an economics class in your life. You're quoting shit you don't even understand.

Repubs are pushing the "price controls" lie in hopes of deceiving voters and influencing the election. But it's just another right wing con.

Harris never said it. She has only painted broad strokes to address price gouging, which could take many forms. We haven't seen details yet, so nobody can say exactly what it will be.

Misterorange and Puddy Tat are therefore either incredibly gullible MAGA dupes, repeating false statements from the Trump campaign, or intentionally lying to deceive others, which is pathetic. So which is it ?

The 2 states where it will be a felony for solicitation have strong R super majority in the State houses.

Vote D DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Vote D

The way to resolve things like price gouging is to get rid of all patent laws and anything creating a monopoly.

Gouging, gauging - WHATEVER, it's still price controls - how else would she "lower" costs, spend more taxpayers' money and print Dollars that created our Inflation hot mess? Nixon did Phase 1/2 Price/Wage controls and it cratered. Cuba sets prices. USSR set prices. Venezuela set prices and destroyed a prosperous country, one of the Top Five 30 years ago and was #1 in South America, and now it is destroyed.

She said she'd bring down food costs (2% profit margin, right) and make housing affordable, that means price controls. If she does "Tax Credits" that's printing money which will stoke inflation as she and Biden have done the past 4 years. Will she lighten regulations? Dems never saw a chance for a regulation they didn't like - the more the better.

She said her "Values have not changed". That speaks volumes. She's never had to run for office, sure, as a Dem in CA which is a no-brainer. The only time she had to run against real opponents was in 2019, and she was the first to drop out with ZERO Delegates. Then through the magic of DEI she became VP - DEMS DIDN'T EVEN WANT HER and yet here we are.

She'll have plenty of time create many Word Salads for dinner. She was way too prepared; CNN gave Clinton the debate questions in 2016. Today, either CNN gave her the questions before or her staff gave CNN the questions to ask.

Like she had all these people at her house, like Hillary making cookies, and Biden called. That response was so phony Holden Caufield would have called her the Phony Idol.

I honestly feel bad for you misterorange. Hating liberals is seemingly all you have going on in your life. Go outside dude live a little. This is embarassing.

^ Another right winger pushing the Trump "price control" "communist Kamala" lie, hard to tell whether he is a MAGA dupe or intentionally lying.

And BTW, it's been well documented that government spending was a factor which made inflation worse, but it was not the main driver of inflation.

That was for mogul

Speaking of controls, how bout' those staffers not controlling their cameras? Sounds like staffers on both sides are numb nuts?

to the original post- that interview was predictable bad. Kamala Harris is even more tightly controlled than Biden. How can a candidate for the presidency of the United States not be allowed to appear on TV without big, fat, White, VP candidate next to her? This woman wants to lead America on the world stage and go toe-to-toe with Putin, Xi, Iran's Supreme Leader, the EU, et al, and she is afraid to give a live, unscripted interview to one of the friendliest news outlets in the world? nly MSNBC and ABC would be more friendly to her. She was clearly looking down and reading from notes, had a surrogate in the video editing process, and still could not give clear, concise answers to carefully selected and pre-approved questions. She is an absolute disaster and must not be elected.

On the emergent sub-thread- wld4cocks is being willfully ignorant as always. Don't waste time because he refuses to listen or quit while he's behind.

Didn’t watch. You know damn well it was scripted. She was given the questions ahead of time and likely heavily edited.

Be presidential and sit down in a live interview with cold questions from an unbiased interviewer

Every news site in the nation mentions Kamal Harris and price controls nd pretty much every economist went after her. The idea that progressives here are pretending none of this happened is why they are the most hateful, despicable, unamerican on the planet. Kamal Harris is so weak, so stupid, so absolutely laughable to our enemies that any of you with children and/or grandchildren are killing them just so you can vote for some affirmative action appointee. Trump was President. We're still alive.

That was a totally phony fucking interview. OBVIOUSLY scripted. Her answers to the questions were so immediate and precise, it was unnatural. No one, whether a highly intelligent and gifted speaker, or a cackling clown like Kamala, responds to questions so quickly and perfectly, without even a moment of thought first.

It was as if there was a teleprompter hidden from the camera's view. Which would mean the questions were not only provided in advance, but the answers were researched and written out. If Dana Bash had any credibility at all before this bogus fucking production, she's got zero now. But that's just fine for CNN. Their audience doesn't care about or expect credibility from them. In fact, I'm not sure they even know what it means.

This was an interview in the same way paid sex is free. I listen to her and wonder how she passed the bar.

I didn't see the 'interview' but I'm not surprised by what I'm reading here. Back when slick willy was running then elected prez cnn was noted for the kid glove treatment that they gave him and his wife to the point that they were called the clinton news network. Nothing's changed over the years except that they should consider changing their name to knn, kamala news network.

Also it's not surprising to see that delusional ball sucking leftist shill POS wild4testes outright lying as he always does in his attempts to promote the controling commie agenda being forced on America.

What’s up with her nasally voice? Is that typical Northern Californian speech?

California is such a melting pot, I never thought they had a distinct dialect. But I remember when Barry Bonds played for the San Francisco Giants he was criticized for sounding aloof. And one linguist said - no, not really, that just typical of the Northern California dialect.

Back in the day you had David Brinkley and Walter Cronkite. Guys like that wouldn't compromise their integrity even if they had a gun to their head. How did the "news" ever get to where it is now? How can the morons we have today look back on the early days of broadcasting and not feel completely ashamed of themselves?

Looking at all of the responses tells us something about America ‘The only correct reaction to anything is overreaction ‘

So, the interview was panned by the right and applauded by the left and didn’t change a single mind. Shocker.

@mogul “This is CNN who gave HILLARY the debate question in 2016 when she debated Trump.”

Are you talking about when the questions were given to Hillary’s campaign ahead of the primary debate with Bernie? I’m familiar with that incident. I’ve never seen anything that said she got questions ahead of a Trump debate, but it’s been 8 years. Have a cite by chance?

Snide comments with general application are definitely an incorrect answer. Unless you have an informed opinion to contribute, how about you go find a corner to drool in and let the men speak?

^ The idiot weirdo reappears

^ Actually pud, it’s the Dunning Kruger effect, if you’re going to be snide and biased, at least get the terminology correct.

Never asked you to take my side I said if you were going make commentary to be correct but fuck all that, you’re Mr cynical with exceptions, the exception being in order to legitimately be cynical you need to know something about the subject, you’re just talking out of your ass with your baseless call outs and silly self owns. You need to take a bit of a break, you just like gamma seem to have an opinion about everything under the sun, tell us, puddy, is there any subject matter that you aren’t an expert on. BTW anyone who uses touch grass as a way of expressing their opinion is probably opinionated in the extreme.

LULZ the sound a pimp makes when he loses an argument, a close match for touch grass

^ you use lulz and other Millennial and zoomer slang all the time, because you lose so many arguments. Hypocrit. Lulz

We need a designated Maxwell's Demon to restore order to threads.

^ weirdo,?you just make everyone laugh with your Dunning Kruger effect comments

"And BTW, it's been well documented that government spending was a factor which made inflation worse, but it was not the main driver of inflation."

Not just "spending", giving away money that people became dependent on that caused supply (not enough)/demand (too much). And Supply was hampered by gov't spending that also caused shortages that drove demand and prices. The cost of energy effected everything across the board.

You forgot Trillion Dollar budget debt spending on worthless projects, and gov't employing over 50% of jobs.

I can always tell when 25 has been watching YouTube because he tries to employ whatever captured his attention for five minutes. Pro tip, pal: you are not even using Dunning-Kruger effect in the proper context. Do a little more research, you are embarrassing yourself.

Puddy Tat has been trying to help you, as well, pointing out how you seem to live for feuds on here. You never offer much of substance on any topic, and lash out whenever anyone offers a differing opinion. Even when occasional allies disagree with you on Trump, no matter how much they have voiced their hatred of Trump, you immediately begin spamming and name-calling.

That behavior, the inability to even hear an opposing opinion, belies your biggest problem - small dick energy. You have so little self-confidence, it cannot even be measured. You attack anyone who disagrees, you lie constantly, you contradict yourself daily, and you DM others and try to drag themselves into the feuds you are constantly starting.

You should take step back and really evaluate everything you want to say anytime you want to make a post. Ask yourself, "Is this coming from a place of wisdom, or a place of fear?" "Am I bringing value to the conversation, or am I doing this for myself?" Either of the latter answer is the truth of a troll.

I am offering you this advice on the off chance that you may want to receive it as an adult. None of this is meant as an attack. Please put aside your defensiveness and really examine your behavior on this board and the negative energy you bring to nearly every interaction. The entire board looks at you as a small-minded, spiteful, bitter old man who would rather burn bridges than build them. If you want to make a meaningful change in yourself for the better, with what little time you have left on Earth, you should start here since you spend most of your time here. Be better. God bless.

^ advice from a weirdo, it would be smarter for you to put me on ignore, your ignorance is only exceeded by your arrogance but that’s what comes from folks like yourself that have been diagnosed with Dunning Kruger effect. What a dope you’ve used up your allotted time with me today, maybe I’ll smack you tomorrow but today’s lesson is over. Do something fun for the rest of the day, I’ve got better things to do with much better people.

Watching Tim Walz and remembering Jesse Ventura I suddenly realized that Minnesotans are the dumbest fucks on earth and might as well be Muslims. How could anyone like smarmy, lying, fraud Tim Tea bagged Walz?

Puddy are you saying twentyfive DMed you asking to take sides in the beef or who?

Also twentyfive is one of the few or perhaps only practicing Jewish member on the forum so for you and gammanu to attack him comes across as anti semetic my friend. Plus isnt he nearly twice your age? If you were saying any of this stuff to him in person he would give you a whooping single handedly.

Finally he appears to be an old school classical liberal, which isnt that much different than being conservative. You probably agree on much politically

@Hank Moody: "@mogul This is CNN who gave HILLARY the debate question in 2016 when she debated Trump.” My bad. It's been a long time, and yes, it was Bernie. Having an interview as Harris' "first" on CNN would be like trusting a pedo babysitting your 8 year old. CNN blew it back then, and is still known for hating on Trump.

She needs to do multiple 45-60 minute interviews like Trump is doing with greatly different people and organizations. The one interview, and an offer was made weeks ago, is one with the All In podcast - it has the largest global podcast, and the 4 guys are from Silicon Valley and not exactly Right Wingers. Trump did 55 minutes. All In is not anywhere near Fox, Rogan or the MSM.

As far as the Harris "interview" last night, I still contend her crew or CNN provided questions/answers, and she had crib notes to refer to the way she glanced down (we never saw the table) when asked about policy, her phrasing never changed and she did ask for note cards for the Trump debate.

When she was asked about personal stuff, that I could careless about, she would look Dana Bash in the eye with no problem. Looking down show she is searching for the the "right" thing to say or to reference notes. Look at the interview Trump did on 60 Minutes or with Phil McGraw - siting in an open chair, no table, just talking.

In 2020, America was told and sold that Biden was a "moderate" unifier. Sure, he probably is, however, we can see today and the past 3.5+ years he was just a Tool and Cog in The Dem Machine being told by Obama's crew (we know they are in the Executive Branch) what to say and do. And Harris supported him 110%, and she lied, and continues to, regarding Biden's mental capabilities. They fall back on "age" as the can apply that to Trump too, but not Pelosi or Bernie?

What were are seeing with Harris/Walz is how Venezuela was seduced by Hugo Chavez and the Bolivarian Revolution in 1999 with a new Constitution replacing the one from 1961. VZ was once the Pearl of South America with a very high standard of living. Voters, like those who supported Castro and Che in the 1950s, believed in Chavez and VZ turned into a shithole country. With Harris/Walz, and Obama's Marxist Ideology, we would continue down that path. We just need to also look at CA, NY, IL to see what hardcore Democrat Super Majority Control can do.

@rickmacrodong "Also twentyfive is one of the few or perhaps only practicing Jewish member on the forum so for you and gammanu to attack him comes across as anti semetic my friend."

How is this "anti-Semitic"?

@25 - is that really how you want to be? I invite you to have a conversation, and not a single sentence in your response is anything you have not written 100 times or more to myself and other members. I am not playing this smarmy tit-for-tat flame war bullshit with you anymore. I do not put you on ignore because you lie too much, you are too full of wrong information that must be corrected. The entire board is aware that TUSCL is your sole social outlet and you have shown us all that you are too unlikeable to have any offline friends. Whatever you really do for the rest of the day, I urge to consider what I have explained to you. I know you will, as I am the sole focus of your short retirement.

Is this your first presidential election?

This literally is how these interviews have gone as long as there has been Television, for both sides of the aisle.

^

Not true, for years the left leaning msm has treated the left much more favorably than the right. That's a fact. Any other outlook is just plain wrong.

JamesSD is correct. For as long as there has been television, the media has treated the democrat party candidates lightly, with kid gloves and softball questions; while hammering the Republican candidates with out-of-context quotes, "gotcha" questions, and outright lies.