Exclusive focus on strip clubs? Exclude legal brothels and massage parlors?

Electronman
Too much of a good thing is never enough
Every now and then a reviewer rejects an unpublished review because the establishment under review is not really a strip club, but more accurately characterized as a legal brothel or massage parlor. Do you agree with this restricted focus?

For me, I am interested in strip clubs because I enjoy attractive, naked women and a range of sexual activities (from flirting lap dances to ITC FS) with them. For that reason, I am also interested in reviews of any business or venue that provides similar adult entertainment, including legal brothels and massage parlors.

What do you think? Should TUSCL have a restricted focus (strip clubs only) or should it include reviews of other adult entertainment venues (e.g., brothels, massage parlors)?

15 comments

  • shadowcat
    4 months ago
    Don't forget the coffee houses that feature baristas. Not my bag but let everyone decide what they want to read.
  • Puddy Tat
    4 months ago
    Good question, fellow feline, and I don't think there's a definition. For what it's worth, I think the line between strip club and brothel is thinner than the one with massage parlor (where you're going primarily for a different service). There are also other sites that do massage parlors.

    I don't know anything about the coffee shops, but I'd say it has to offer some kind of 1:1 attention, like lap dances, rather than just being a place with tits out.
  • gammanu95
    4 months ago
    The reviewer gets to choose. I think you're a sad fuck if you want to review lingerie or bikini coffee ☕️ shop, but I'm cool with Tijuana clubs and German FKKs
  • IWantHerOnMe
    4 months ago
    If the brothel is legal I don't care. Massage parlors should be out IMO.
  • TheeOSU
    4 months ago
    This subject has been brought up in the past and my thoughts on it have never changed. The name of this site is The Ultimate Strip Club List, not massage parlor or brothel list. There are other sites that cater to parlors, brothels, etc, let's stick to strip clubs.

    Now I enjoy reading about FKK clubs, I'd like to make it to one some day but I also enjoy reading about power tools, fast cars, firearms, military, etc but that doesn't mean just because I enjoy them they should all be reviewed here.
    Let's stick to strip clubs.

    Yes we have off topic discussions, politics, etc but we have dedicated sub forums for them. If you want to review a parlor whorehouse, review it in discussions, or write an article.

    Now that's my opinion and I know that doesn't count much or that homo cjkunt would have been banned again and every ensuing time he re-registers. Lol
  • jmiddle30234
    4 months ago
    Leave them I may visit someday
  • Dolfan
    4 months ago
    If it's a listing on this site, I presume founder has made the decision already. Rejecting a review on the basis that it doesn't belong here seems stupid.

    If the listing should exist is another question, to which my response would be that most of those places aren't my bag but I see no reason to exclude them. They're close enough that I think there is significant overlap in interest.
  • Dolfan
    4 months ago
    I'd suggest the people rejecting those reviews on that basis just simply not vote on those reviews.
  • From978
    4 months ago
    There are 3400 US clubs on this site. 3300 of them are of no interest to me, but that's not a reason to exclude them. It's easy to ignore listings you don't want. It's impossible to see listings that would be censored because Electronman didn't like them.
  • stripperlover777
    4 months ago
    🤠 It Should All B Included On Here!
    It's Nothing But People's Right To Post Reviews Of "Through/Similar Cross Markets".
    Sometimes, Strip Clubs Aren't Feasible For Some Folks & There Is Related Activity In The Cross Markets, To Justify It 💲
  • whodey
    4 months ago
    I agree with dolfan, since @founder included the listing on the site anyone should be able to review those listings.

    At the same time, if founder decided to remove every listing that isn't a traditional strip club I'd be fine with that as well since I only read reviews of strip clubs on here and just ignore the massage parlors, swinger's clubs, etc.
  • mjx01
    4 months ago
    IMO the other listings should be allowed. What is or isn't permitted ITC on US soil varies wildly from one location to another. Trying to include or exclude some establishment based on an arbitrary definition makes no sense to me. I see no reason to discriminate against other establishments. More info is better than less IMO. As other's have pointed out, don't read the one's you're not interested in.
  • 59
    4 months ago
    I'm fine with the wider scope. While I've technically never been to a brothel or massage parlor I've partaken in similar services. Independent escorts and massage girls. As well as providers and UTR girls I've encountered in clubs.

    It's all good.
  • snowtime
    4 months ago
    I am all for including the brothels and lingerie shops. If you don't want to read those reviews, don't do it. Based on earlier comments , It looks like a lot of us like the opportunity to read them. Especially for people who travel to areas with poor strip clubs, a lingerie place or brothel might be a welcome alternative.
  • funonthaside
    4 months ago
    Considering that some TUSCLers avoid strip clubs that are not effectively brothels, I believe there should be no issue for inclusion of legal brothels in reviews.
You must be a member to leave a comment.Join Now
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion