I'm spoiled.
georgmicrodong
Just a fat, creepy old pervert.
Yes, streetwalkers and escorts tend to be cheaper than most dancers, but many people, including myself, have posted numerous times that the difference is worth it in terms of both looks and experience.
Yes, there are escorts who are at least on par with dancers in the looks department, but they charge $400, 500, 600 or more *per hour*. For reference, $5-600 per hour is about the max I've seen actually have willingly paid here in the Louisville market. I'm perfectly aware that's chump change when compared to some other places, but that's the market here. I've never sprung for one of those "high end" types, but I've seen the patron's comments about how good those experiences are, but they don't seem all that different than what I get from my sugar baby, and not too dissimilar to most of the other strippers I've seen. And for a lot less.
So, I'm spoiled.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
22 comments
Latest
Escorts (and assume street walkers) will give you experiences that men can generally only get if they have groupies. Your dick can be in her mouth within 2 minutes of hello. If seeing someone reminds you of uniquely good experiences, they naturally look better to you than they would otherwise.
Youre saying the hot strippers are “a lot less” than $500 an hour? How? From my understanding they will still want 500 bucks but theyll just give you more than an hour for it. Yet an escort if she doesnt have clients waiting on her could also possibly give you more than an hour for the $500.
“$5-600 per hour is about the max I've seen actually have willingly paid here in the Louisville market”
I don’t understand that line. Are you saying $500 to $600 is the most youve witnessed someone else pay for an escort?
Supposedly the famous people who want to use escorts actually have an assistant of theirs go through the entire verification and photo ID process and then they both show up to the appointment to explain the booking was actually for the celebrity
Given that LEO doesn't seem to care much about entrapment anymore, and when they do, they employ a variety of tricks, one of which is lying in court, to avoid claims of entrapment, and the courts seem to be giving them the benefit of the doubt that they didn't entrap the victim, the "I'm charging for time, not sex" defense is about as stupid as anything I've ever come across.
"If seeing someone reminds you of uniquely good experiences, they naturally look better to you than they would otherwise."
I can understand that, but if one considers a sometimes smelly, meth scrawny, track scar scabby, incoherent woman giving a blowjob to be a "uniquely good" experience, I really don't understand *that*. I can't imagine ever being that desperate. I guess I should consider myself lucky.
The meth scrawny, track scar scabby woman is a stereotype of the street walking prostitutes… its not accurate even with many street walkers but has almost no relevance to an online escort charging $300+ an hour. In some cities the eros and tryst girls smoke any of the local dancers boy…
Anyway the charging for time is the reason why escorting is a legal gray area. And many escorts are strict about not discussing specific acts on text or even in person. Youre expected to hand over the money based on the time alone. If she starts sucking you off 20 minutes into your visit, technically speaking thats simply because shes just that horny and slutty and likes you that much. The money was paid for her time alone so she didnt legally have to give you anything besides companionship and sitting with you for an hour.
But this is in fact how some escorts can get away with scamming because they dont legally or technically have to give you anything besides their time and attention. So you may pay up front and they could decide to just do nothing besides talk for that hour or massage you. Technically you still got the time you paid for. Of course the more well reviewed escorts, or the ones who want customers coming back, will likely do much more than just talk to you.
It's about as stupid as a store trying to sell booze claiming, "I'm selling the container for its collectible value and not the contents which is free."
In states where it is illegal they will sell it via the method you described, or sell it as pets milk, so technically its rated for pet consumption only, but anyone can buy it. Or the most complex method they use is a herdshare program where you pay a monthly fee to own a % of stock in an actual cow, which then gives you free milk from the cow every week or month. That would be like paying for stock in a wine company or facility and then getting free wine… it seems like it does work because its what many of these raw milk suppliers are doing. And they can openly advertise that on websites without being shut down.
Although maybe the reason it can work with milk is because milk is so cheap, that you can legally get away with arguing that you paid $6.00 for a glass bottle. But with wine bottles, they would have to make a really fancy looking bottle if they were to try to sell alcohol worth hundreds of dollars whilst claiming its being sold for the containers value.
But the real problem is things like raw milk or escorting or prostitution shouldn’t be illegal or regulated in the first place… the loopholes at least allow them to openly advertise without getting their websites taken down
I only knew one escort who got arrested by an undercover cop. But he arrested her for not having a Georgia entertainer's license, not for prostitution. US courts are actually pretty principled about entrapment. Most of the abuse of defendants comes in the form of forcing them to take a plea, because pre-trial detention will ruin their lives anyway. Escorts tend to have savings, they can make bail.
I wonder how crazy things would get if they fully legalized prostitution to where you could openly propose someone on the street, gym, grocery store etc? Imo it would completely change everything, people would be getting openly solicited at malls grocery stores and it would likely make women a lot richer and shrink the wealth gap probably.