Do Adjudicators not check profiles when making claims on reviews?

You can't see who the review is from when you're voting on it, so no they don't check.

Also, "real" accounts can submit reviews written by AI. The accusation isn't that your entire profile is a bot, but rather that the text submitted was generated by an AI. I don't see anything in that text that looks AI-ish to me though, at least not one of the popular ones.

We don’t really have adjudicators the reviews are judged by members who have no real guideline’s and are winging it mostly on their personal biases, the saving grace of our system is 4 of 7 must pass each, and there are more lenient members than tough ones. The system isn’t perfect but it works.

Thanks for the heads up you all, I do appreciate people making sure that the reviews on this website are legit

I just like to make sure the review has information that is useful, and isn't real hard to read. When I went to school back in the horse and buggy days we were required to write essays and such. We got marked down for spelling and grammar. Many of the reviews are so poorly written I'm embarrassed for the writer. I'll see "I would of gotten a dance...". "of" and "have" sound similar, but "of" is a preposition and "have" is a verb. I'm sure there are readers who have no idea what I'm talking about. Reviewers that go on and on about their day, "I had a meeting but it got postponed..." doesn't provide useful information. Another thing I don't like is when the reviewer insults the adjudicator, like "For the nazis who have to see the prices in every review...". Also it seems some adjudicators approve everything. Once I said "not enough details" but approved it anyway. The submitter sent me a nasty PM!

“the saving grace of our system is 4 of 7 must pass each”

It takes 5/7 to pass. It was increased in the last 6-9 months from 4/7.

Don’t worry about getting some downvotes, but you may want to take them as constructive criticism. Some downvotes are wrong, but if you get more than one, the criticism probably has some validity.

Some reviews and articles have been generated by AI and submitted by lazy users here. The only time I've commented that something is AI, though, is after I plug the copy into an AI checker and get a positive result.

I think you’re a robot.

UKfan, your review was awesome. Perfect length and content. Please share your AI source with everyone because it's pretty damn good, man. Lol

I am a robot. Beep.