Is onlyfans better than club experience?

avatar for Phoenix1332
Phoenix1332
Curious to hear everyone’s thoughts. I’ve recently started an onlyfans due to health issues making it harder for me to do work in clubs anymore. But how does everyone feel about virtual vs in person? Do you prefer one over the other? What do you like best about each option? Do you think virtual is starting to take over clientele from clubs? Many places lately have died down it seems.

Do you have a favorite content creator? Do you prefer other sites over onlyfans?

(Also if anyone would like a link feel free to message me. This is phoenix133, for those who knew my old account.)

33 comments

Jump to latest
avatar for bang69
bang69
2 years ago
I prefer going to the club.
avatar for Dolfan
Dolfan
2 years ago
I've got about zero interest in an onlyfans subscription. I've got about the same interest in buying content or online/virtual encounters.

Best of luck to you though, there are certainly consumers of that content out there. I don't think many of them are on this site, I expect most here to strongly prefer in person experiences over virtual. I have no idea if that reflects the market at large, the primary focus of this site certainly implies a bias.
avatar for shailynn
shailynn
2 years ago
During COVID I joined a few OF accounts from strippers I knew, mainly to just donate to the cause.

It was immediately clear when joining a page who put some effort into it and who just posted 4 photos and a 30 second video and expected the money to start rolling in.

From what little I’ve experienced you have to put some effort in to keep people coming back if you want repeat subscriptions.
avatar for Tetradon
Tetradon
2 years ago
OnlyFans eats a bowl of dicks. There's already enough porn out there. I want ass in my crotch and tits in my face and possibly extras. Only fans can't provide me that.
avatar for JamesSD
JamesSD
2 years ago
I think you would get a very different answer here than somewhere like Reddit.

I'll just say I've spent at least $1000 on real life women in clubs and $0 on OF. But clearly there is a market because some women make bank.
avatar for SanchoRG
SanchoRG
2 years ago
Not even close. Paying just for pics and videos is simpy as fuck. OF is only worthwhile as a means to setting up OTC
avatar for Mate27
Mate27
2 years ago
Yes
avatar for rattdog
rattdog
2 years ago
why would i spend any $$$ on an OF account? if there is an OF girl that i am into i'll just do a web search on her. chances there are some video clip(s) are bound to pop up. just takes a little bit time and effort to seek and find.

avatar for rattdog
rattdog
2 years ago
how much are the average costs to join and be a member? let's say $30.

well for an extra $30 i could pay for 2 dances to one of my fave girls to let me touch all over, make out, and have my dick out on her ass to grind away to completion.

say why don't you ask this: what would the guys rather have, feet pics or a couple of posters of their favorite bands?
avatar for From978
From978
2 years ago
A site called XSRUS says the median only fans account makes $180 per month. I don't know how reliable that is, but it suggests almost everybody agrees with the posters above that they wouldn't pay much for a subscription.
avatar for SanchoRG
SanchoRG
2 years ago
Just to further explain how bad it is. I spent like $140 in a month trying to get a local OF girl to meet up with me. At the end of the month, OF sent me an email saying I was in the top 2% of spenders sitewide that month. Meanwhile spending $140 a month at the club would probably put me in the bottom 2%. There is just so much more money flowing at the club and for good reason. $40 on OF might get me three 40 second 2d videos. That same $40 will get me a sub to a porn site with unlimited access to full 8k 3D VR videos of incredibly hot girls complete with interactive scripts that connect to sex toys.
avatar for minnow
minnow
2 years ago
I'm in complete agreement with many posters. To make a non sex industry analogy:
Patronizing only fans is like buying an automotive mag to read sports car review, Going to clubs is like driving a real sports car. Any questions ?
avatar for booty_lover92
booty_lover92
2 years ago
In the sense of actually seeing a girl completely naked in sex acts OF is better and a guarantee. If physical touch is your thing and to not being a voyeur OF comes nowhere close to the Strip Club experience where you could be feeling up on the woman of your dreams in seconds.
avatar for Mike Rotch
Mike Rotch
2 years ago
The problem with OF is the competition. You are going up against thousands of other women who are doing the exact same thing. What do you offer that's new? Why should guys subscribe to you? The only positive with OF is that you are reaching a very large customer base (online perverts). Whereas with strip clubs, you are competing against a dozen or so other girls. And your customers can range from 5 to 30 depending on the night but they are each carrying way more money than some online teen who swiped his mom's credit card.

Lastly, I don't care how hot your videos and photos are, nothing beats the physical touch of a woman.
avatar for Call.Me.Ishmael
Call.Me.Ishmael
2 years ago
I have no interest in OF. But I'm lucky enough to live someplace with great clubs. If I lived in a strip club wasteland, then I might have a different opinion.
avatar for Brahma2k
Brahma2k
2 years ago
I don’t have issue with OF or webcams or whatever. If that’s what does it for you then have at it. It doesn’t do it for me but web search produced videos or even a pic can be +1. Recently I was looking through a website that had playboy centerfold pics across the years (Free other than ad watching). Oh the memories!

Like @ratdog said, a web search will provide good results. He’s spot on for that. But if there is an OF woman that does it for you, IMHO pony up the few bucks to get the full show.
avatar for Call.Me.Ishmael
Call.Me.Ishmael
2 years ago
I've read a few articles on this and other forms of content creation. I also have friends who bring in a bit of money with content creation (but not OF).

Broadly speaking, realize that it's not fast money even if you post regularly, communicate with your fans, and put time and money into improving your content, it will take a while to build an audience.

Specific to OF, I think that COVID gave some OF girls a false sense of confidence. Because a lot of guys couldn't go anywhere at all, the OF provider only needed to be hot and semi consistent to make some money. That's not true anymore.

From what I've seen, the OF providers that are doing better now are the ones catering to specific niches and fetishes that aren't easily found in strip clubs or mainstream sex work. So, maybe study up on long-tail marketing before you launch anything.

Good luck.
avatar for funonthaside
funonthaside
2 years ago
OF ultimately costs more than SC, and with no contact and much dissapointment. Also, content is no better than what you can get for free elsewhere on internet.

I prefer camgirl sites, particularly the ones where you can tip with tokens tor certain things (show pussy, give head to her man, fingering, dildo, etc), but which are public rooms where you can watch even without tipping.

They are fully interactive and live, so it's better than recorded OF videos/photos.
avatar for funonthaside
funonthaside
2 years ago
Clarification....I prefer camgirl sites to OF...but my ultimate preference is SCs, for the reasons others have mentioned. Cam sites are merely backups to when going out is not practical, but I need to nut.
avatar for skibum609
skibum609
2 years ago
Of course, Only Fans is better than touch, feel and orgasm in a club. Why it's almost comparable to watching a cooking show on tv instead of going out to dinner and actually eating really good food.
avatar for ilbbaicnl
ilbbaicnl
2 years ago
I like online porn. But, other than skipping and fast forwarding in videos, it's not worth the extra cost for it to be interactive. I prefer an experience that also involves touching along with looking. I'm also fine with "non-interactive" lap dances. Where she spends about half the time in my lap facing me, and half standing facing away from me (but within easy reach).
avatar for Jascoi
Jascoi
2 years ago
nothing like real physical contact.
avatar for Warrior15
Warrior15
2 years ago
I have no interest in Only Fans. There is loads of free porn on the internet. If I'm paying something, I want to touch the girls.
avatar for twentyfive
twentyfive
2 years ago
Only fans isn’t for most of us, we’re a hands on bunch of horn dogs.
avatar for drewcareypnw
drewcareypnw
2 years ago
They’re different things entirely. Money to be made in both. I personally find OF interesting when it is content made by dancers I see ITC or want to see ITC. For general porno purposes, I prefer youporn etc. good luck!
avatar for groundball
groundball
2 years ago
I've talked to some dancers who tried OF. The girls who do good on OF are those who are good at production and are good at regularly making content. The girls that do well in the club are those with good people skills, and so if you're a long-time dancer you aren't guaranteed success with OF.
avatar for Warrior15
Warrior15
2 years ago
On Reddit, there are several forums with little videos of girls doing all kinds of things. Anything from merely flashing their breasts to full blown gangbangs. Virtually all of them link back to an Only Fans page. But the funny things is. There is so many of them that there is absolutely no reason why anybody should actually subscribe to any of these. You can watch what is posted for free for hours if you have the time.
avatar for gSteph
gSteph
2 years ago
Is onlyfans better than club experience?

I've heard that in some clubs you can actually touch the girls. Sometimes you can touch their breasts.

I'm gonna have to say NO
avatar for georgmicrodong
georgmicrodong
2 years ago
I'd have to agree with the poster who alluded to the fact that this probably isn't the place to get positive opinions on OF. We're a bunch of literally hands on perverts, and the "lesser" (to many here) experience of OF isn't going to satisfy. Do I watch porn? Sure, for free, on a dozen different web sites that my VPN keeps pretty ad-free. (I realize that negates what allows these sites to remain free, but given the intrusiveness and potential danger of many ads on the web, I don't care.)

Also, be aware that OF has recently been terminating some accounts for violation of terms. I don't know precisely what those comprised violations, but I've heard that OF doesn't like hardcore BDSM, piss, shit, or blood play. If that's the kind of content you have, direct sales on Twitter is probably a better place. Allegedly Fansly is more forgiving, but I don't know for sure.
avatar for Jdo11
Jdo11
2 years ago
You're gonna have to find some serious (as in literally bipolar - schizoid) simps to have them find virtual content more satisfying than irl ITC experiences.
Speaking as a fully functioning adult normie, the only way I'd sub to a OF was if I was interested in seeing a providers capabilities before commiting to OTC with them.
avatar for Tetradon
Tetradon
2 years ago
^ I'm literally bipolar and think OnlySimps is literally paying for something offered for free everywhere else online.
avatar for Mike Rotch
Mike Rotch
2 years ago
Yea that's another thing. When it goes online, it goes all around the web and it stays there forever. I can look up any of the big-time OF thots and I'm certain I'll find nude pics n vids of them with no problem. You guys remember the Fappening? Once it leaks, there is no stopping it. Strip clubs are super private in comparison. A stripper can live a double-life and no one would ever know.
avatar for bkkruined
bkkruined
2 years ago
With onlyfans, it's my hand on my cock. In the club, it's her ass.

Um, DUH?

There's this personal aspect to onlyfans that you just don't get with free porn, or so I'm told.

My issue it, usually, the more I get to know strippers, the less I like them. I assume that's why the music is so loud, and it works.
You must be a member to leave a comment.Join Now