Review stolen from another site
I know nothing can be done about it but what is up with that?? You can't post your own experience and have to steal my review? Not cool not cool
https://tuscl.net/review.php?id=382712
I posted this on "the other board" back in November 2021.
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthre…
And yes I could of posted it here but IMO the review system is BROKEN... but that's for another topic.
https://tuscl.net/review.php?id=382712
I posted this on "the other board" back in November 2021.
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthre…
And yes I could of posted it here but IMO the review system is BROKEN... but that's for another topic.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
11 comments
He deleted the account of someone who plagiarized one of mine.
No worries Meat, at least in a way I feel the positive comment was for me, so thank you!
Bummer for VegasSlut21... he was a long time member...
Now I'm curious, OP what do you have against the review system here?
@TFP, thanks! My main thing when posting reviews are the Adjudicators
Adjudicators - Anyone can be one I suppose, so you've got someone from East Coast who's not familiar with clubs in the West Coast. That person will of course need Club details, layouts etc as well as dance prices. It seems a bit redundant to repeat the same info on every review, especially for a club that you visit frequently. Most of the time they will complain during the approval process.
It would be nice if we can have adjudicators from the same state to approve these reviews. At least they're local and most likely are already familiar with the club layout and dance prices.
You can already get the dance prices now if you click on the club info. It would be nice to have another section to describe the club layout here, that way people don't have to repeat this in their reviews and focus more on their club experience.
IMO that can be counterproductive – having only folks familiar w/ a club as adjudicators leads to confirmation-bias per se – i.e. they won’t see a need for details b/c they already know them – having someone adjudicate a review that is *not* familiar w/ the club is helpful, if not more helpful, b/c they are seeing the review w/ a fresh-set-of-eyes per se and can more easily pick up on missing details – as I’ve posted in the past, a review should be written from the POV of someone who’s never been to the club, vs from the POV “that everyone knows what the club is about” – IMO the main purpose of reviews is to fill-in those that are unfamiliar w/ the club vs just “talking to the regulars”.
“… It would be nice to have another section to describe the club layout …”
Over and over there are those on here that think when TUSCLers complain about lack of details in a review, that they are referring to the layout – I don’t recall anyone ever rejecting a review b/c it was missing layout details – the details that adjudicators care about are the details custies use to determine if they’ll visit a club – custies don’t pick a club based on the layout of the damn place; they pick clubs based on the talent in the club (dancer looks/types); based on the mileage available; and to some extent based on the price – these are the *details* adjudicators care about, not the layout or where the bathroom is located.
As shadowcat mentioned, that data can often be incorrect, or incomplete - e.g. a club can have $10 floor-dances and $20 lap-dances but the club's page may only mention one of them - or the club may have dance-specials, this may also not be mentioned in the club's page.
It only takes a couple of sentences to give the basics of the club (dancer-looks/types; mileage available; prices) - yes it can be "repetitive" but it's only "repetitive" to those already familiar w/ the club; for someone unfamiliar w/ the club, or a newbie to TUSCL, it'll be brand-new-info - the more reviews approved w/o the basic club info, the harder it is to find that info when someone unfamiliar w/ the club is researching a club(s).