I was just at usasexguide and noticed there were three times as many posts in the massage section than there was in the strip club section for Indianapolis, where I live, so they are obviously more popular than strip clubs. Checking a few other cities, I see a disparity there too.
This made me wonder why strip clubs can't compete with massage places. The obvious answer is that massage places offer easier access to sexual services than strip clubs but then why is that? If massage places can get away with this then why can't strip clubs in the same city get away with it too?


Massage places are the questionable vending machine of sex work. They are popular because they are cheaper and more straightforward than a strip club. They are also populated by assembly-line high volume sex workers who work under ethically sketchy conditions (this specifically refers to Asian massage parlors, which I remember making up the bulk of the chat at USASG). When Rhode Island cracked down on local AMPs, they found that the women working there were sleeping either on mattresses on the floor or on the massage tables. They also had their passports taken away by their employers.
Given all of that, I'm not sure it's a matter of strip clubs not being able to compete with massage places; it's more like they don't want to compete with massage places. It's also worthwhile to note that not all dancers want to work in a high-volume brothel, and not all strip club owners want to operate a high-volume brothel.
Many years ago, I went to AMPs on occasion without knowing much about how they operated, but then I started to learn more and decided it was simultaneously too mechanical and skeevy for me. So, I don't do that anymore. Also, I have fun in strip clubs. And I don't just mean the time I spend in VIP with a hot dancer (though that's pretty great...). I have fun just being in a strip club.