RandomMember, when you make comparisons in deaths between Sweden and Denmark you are making an apples and oranges comparison because they don't have the same demographics.
Denmark has much stricter immigration laws than Sweden and fewer third world immigrants. A large number of deaths in Sweden were in this immigrant group. Many immigrants in Sweden were unemployed so the government set up a program to find jobs for them and gave many of them jobs in nursing homes. Their poor Swedish language skills and lower IQ made it difficult for them to follow directions on how to control the disease and this caused higher death rates in nursing homes. Swedish police have little control in immigrant areas of major cities. The Swedish authorities were aware of this and knew it would be difficult to enforce lockdowns in these areas and that was a factor in deciding to not lockdown. So a lesson to be learned from this is to have less third world immigrants but American liberals who point to Denmark as an example to follow ignore this. They think third world immigration is good because immigrants overwhelmingly vote to put more liberals in office.
There are other factors involved too I've read about. Unlike Denmark, the northern part of Sweden is very cold so the population is concentrated in the south leading to greater population density. Higher population density equals more deaths. Stockholm has higher mass transit usage than any other Scandinavian city and that leads to more deaths. There was an unusually low number of flu deaths in Sweden in 2019 so many people who would have died from the flu in 2019 died from coronavirus in 2020 instead. Sweden followed the Andrew Cuomo policy of moving sick people from hospitals to nursing homes with similar results. Sweden uses a death classification method which puts more deaths in the COVID- 19 category. Finnish people like to retire in Sweden so Sweden has more elderly people. I don't know if all of these factors are true but they sound plausible. The mainstream media is not going to report any of this because they want to make the Swedish model look bad so if you Google on this you are going to find mainly information coming from one side.
There is a problem with proponents of more government intervention in general. They tend to look at short term benefits of a government intervention while ignoring long term costs. When considering the effects of an intervention you need to look at both the seen and unseen. The seen is in the present and the unseen is often in the future. This focus on the present has led lockdown proponents into advocating policies which will have disastrous . long term results. The coming economic contraction will lead to future deaths of despair like suicides and deaths from drug and alcohol abuse. Cancer deaths are already increasing in the U.S. because diagnosis and treatment were put off due to the exclusive focus on this disease. If you add up all these future deaths caused by the lockdown it may very well exceed deaths from Covid-19.