US Surpasses Sweden in COVID-19 Deaths Per Capita
nickifree
Texas
Sweden didn't shutdown their economy and took the full brunt of the Coronavirus head on. Because of this their COVID-19 deaths per One Million population swelled to over 550 deaths for every million people, by the start of July.
The U.S. has surpassed that metric and now stand at 580 COVID-19 deaths per million people. Even worse Sweden only has a few COVID-19 deaths per day. Comparatively the US has thousands of deaths each day, and is still pretty much in lockdown with fears of a second wave coming.
The US, Mexico and all these other countries with obesity problems will suffer for years to come. Any vaccine is going to be far less effective as body mass increases. But rather than discuss personal health, liberals want to blame on healthcare. That's a terrible strategy.
The U.S. has surpassed that metric and now stand at 580 COVID-19 deaths per million people. Even worse Sweden only has a few COVID-19 deaths per day. Comparatively the US has thousands of deaths each day, and is still pretty much in lockdown with fears of a second wave coming.
The US, Mexico and all these other countries with obesity problems will suffer for years to come. Any vaccine is going to be far less effective as body mass increases. But rather than discuss personal health, liberals want to blame on healthcare. That's a terrible strategy.
39 comments
____________
No, the US has in the range of 500 to 1200 deaths per day as of early september. Trump's new darling medical advisor (Scott Atlas) wants the US to emulate the Swedish approach.
got to keep everyone afraid
Overall, not only did the U.S. not have fewer deaths but the U.S. might have been left worse off in other areas since shutting down strip clubs and all the other businesses caused a lot of economic damage. Sweden had only a 6% economic contraction in the second quarter of this year compared to a 10% contraction here in the United States. A lot of the economic contraction in Sweden happened in the import-export sector which was disrupted by the lockdowns in neighboring countries.
We can close down as long as the experts want but this virus will just be waiting in the wings. If a vaccine that works comes out, that will help. If vulnerable people stay home, those who choose can go on with their lives.
If you are paranoid, hide in your closet the rest of your life. You have no moral right to te anyone else what they can or can't do. Especially over some joke illness that kills almost no one.
Probably All Bs Keep Worrying About Virus And Politics
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KPon_pA…
Both had about the same 8% decline in GDP.
For @Orion: Do you think something you heard from your pastor's wife convinces anyone that most MDs are feeling pressure to falsify death certificates? If anything, Covid deaths are understated. As I posted above: bullshit.
Quick back-of-the-envelope calculation:
(1) The population of US is about 330M
(2) An estimate of Covid infection fatality-rate: 0.3%
(3) Herd immunity occurs when 65% of the population is infected.
(330M)*(0.003)*(0.65) = 643K deaths if we follow the Swedish model.
Here in the U.S. the economic damage from the lockdowns will last years into the future. For example, it is estimated that half of all restaurants may eventually go out of business. The three trillion extra dollars the U.S. government had to borrow to deal with the economic damage from the lockdowns will have to be paid back. Americans will have a lower standard of living in the future because of this. Someday they will look back on the lockdowns and will realize what a mistake they were.
(3) Herd immunity occurs when 65% of the population is infected.”
From what I’ve read, fatality rate is .1% or lower. Lots of sources think herd immunity will occur at much lower percentages because of antibodies from other CoVid. I can’t prove my numbers. Can you prove yours ?
It's intended to be approximate. If I use 0.1% infection fatality rate, that gives about 215K deaths. We'll most likely be there in about a month.
Lockdowns keep people from congregating and potentially catching and spreading the disease.
Are far as reducing deaths to stats and claiming tbeyre dispensible individuals. Go tell that to their families
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/cov…
(although the wife of @Orion's pastor isn't included).
One of the models (IHME) was the darling of the WSJ and the White House earlier this year because it predicted 61K deaths, in line with a bad flu year. Now the IHME is predicting 410K deaths by year end.
https://covid19.healthdata.org/united-st…
Here are the eurostat numbers showing that Denmark and Sweden had about the same GDP downturn (8%-ish) as of a few weeks ago. There's been no uptick in deaths so far in Denmark:
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/…
You post a lot obnoxious shit @Nicki; try to back it up with facts.
I don't get a CRAP where Ran-Dumb-Member gets his information.
And why the fuck would anyone quote what those stupid modelers are saying now ? These people said 3 million, then they said 60,000, then they said 120,000, now they say 400,000. Anyone can make up a number and be closer than these idiots.
Denmark has much stricter immigration laws than Sweden and fewer third world immigrants. A large number of deaths in Sweden were in this immigrant group. Many immigrants in Sweden were unemployed so the government set up a program to find jobs for them and gave many of them jobs in nursing homes. Their poor Swedish language skills and lower IQ made it difficult for them to follow directions on how to control the disease and this caused higher death rates in nursing homes. Swedish police have little control in immigrant areas of major cities. The Swedish authorities were aware of this and knew it would be difficult to enforce lockdowns in these areas and that was a factor in deciding to not lockdown. So a lesson to be learned from this is to have less third world immigrants but American liberals who point to Denmark as an example to follow ignore this. They think third world immigration is good because immigrants overwhelmingly vote to put more liberals in office.
There are other factors involved too I've read about. Unlike Denmark, the northern part of Sweden is very cold so the population is concentrated in the south leading to greater population density. Higher population density equals more deaths. Stockholm has higher mass transit usage than any other Scandinavian city and that leads to more deaths. There was an unusually low number of flu deaths in Sweden in 2019 so many people who would have died from the flu in 2019 died from coronavirus in 2020 instead. Sweden followed the Andrew Cuomo policy of moving sick people from hospitals to nursing homes with similar results. Sweden uses a death classification method which puts more deaths in the COVID- 19 category. Finnish people like to retire in Sweden so Sweden has more elderly people. I don't know if all of these factors are true but they sound plausible. The mainstream media is not going to report any of this because they want to make the Swedish model look bad so if you Google on this you are going to find mainly information coming from one side.
There is a problem with proponents of more government intervention in general. They tend to look at short term benefits of a government intervention while ignoring long term costs. When considering the effects of an intervention you need to look at both the seen and unseen. The seen is in the present and the unseen is often in the future. This focus on the present has led lockdown proponents into advocating policies which will have disastrous . long term results. The coming economic contraction will lead to future deaths of despair like suicides and deaths from drug and alcohol abuse. Cancer deaths are already increasing in the U.S. because diagnosis and treatment were put off due to the exclusive focus on this disease. If you add up all these future deaths caused by the lockdown it may very well exceed deaths from Covid-19.
Oh yeah, and fuck you too.
The "effective-GDP" argument is new to me. Quick search shows that both Sweden and Denmark had Covid fiscal stimulus, but couldn't find any details about how large the effective-GDP correction is. I'm wondering if the effective-GDG argument is the result of a few cranks out there or the result of some think-tank. As I said above, post a link with a supporting calculation.
It's an academic argument since the states will do whatever they want regardless of what Atlas or Trump are recommending.
New Zealand has done exceptionally well -- per capita deaths below ours by a factor of about 100x.
Didn't the fake doc phil spell genius, genious?
Not the real doc phil who is a great guy but the fake dot doc. Or was that another troll who always used the term "space genious"?
Another one of your alias troll accounts like real dougster, mtent, josh43, and countless others rumdum?
For being such a self proclaimed "genious" you slip up a lot and expose your true ignorance by exposing your past troll accounts you moronic dipshit!