Unpopular Opinion: Most Girls look better in normal clothes...
Muddy
USA
Than stripper wear or even, yes naked. Ass a lot of times ain't there. No rack whatsoever is very common. A lot of people just don't look great naked. I blame my imagination, it's always kicking reality's ass. When I look at a girl in her Mcdonald's uniform oh god who knows what's underneath, golly! But then it's comes off, nope it's just not quite there. I would say if you like girls with meat on them, and I do but they are notorious for it, because those clothes, bra, jeans are keeping everything together, take it off, boom now you gotta fuck the Michelin Man.
24 comments
one pawg i always check out in my building had her jeans really out on tight, the next time she wore something else and i reacted, "holy shit-her ass and hips grew!!!" got be aware-these girls can be real deceptive.
I personally think I look better naked. Clothes tend to hide my ladyboy schlong. 😜
More agreement than I thought. I’ll just be in a strip club thinking, I would be attracted to these girls if they had clothes on. But now that I have a front row seat, Na I’m good. Btw I’m sure this feeling is multiplied Vice versa most men look awful without clothes.
It’s not the same when you switch it around. Notice how many magazines were devoted to female nudity vs male nudity?
In general, you need a truly gorgeous body to look better naked. Less gorgeous bodies always look better clothed, clothes can way cover deficiencies and make the good parts absolutely tantalizing. That's why old people and fat people always look better clothed. Young people with amazing bodies always look better naked (although they amazing in clothes too). Young people whose bodies are less than amazing, still look better clothed
That's why I give nothing but props to the women in clubs who look great wearing that skimpy stuff. Sure the lighting in the club helps with making their skin tone look better and masking blemishes. But obviously a lot of them put in the work to stay fit so they can look great both in and out of clothes.
Still, many dancers are more attractive clothed in natural lighting than made up in SC lighting. First impressions in SC are heavily distorted by the novelty of full nudity!
Related frightening observation: “What monstrosities would walk the streets were some people's faces as unfinished as their minds.” - Eric Hoffer.
But a McDonald's uniform? Really? Being stamped an hourly wage slave by evil McCorporation doesn't seem flattering whatsoever....
I'm such a dog I notice the curves of all restaurant workers.
For sure, on that last statement, average stripper is more attractive than average female. That said, I find the vast majority of strippers come into the club wearing their "average girl" disguise -- little makeup, loose sweats, loose hoodie that may hide their hair, etc. I'm still fascinated to watch them walk in, but typically I don't think you see a stripper's full clothed potential until you take her on an OTC that includes dinner and drinking -- then they go full-on sex kitten party clothes, and, damn.
And since they are hired for their looks they will also be above average regardless of the physical work involved.
To me I've seen strippers in their Plain Jane civie clothes and they are still hotter than the average chick in the same attire. Also most of the time when I'm surprised and let down with a civie girl's body after seeing it naked and thinking she had a hot body clothed, it's because she had fake tits that I couldn't tell through clothes or her tits in general weren't as appealing.
Some women dress great. Others... Not so much