Satisfaction?

No, not The Rolling Stones song, but the new review criteria that replaced dancers. I don't care for it and preferred the old dancers rating. I don't mind an additional rating called satisfaction even though it's not that different from value, although a club could have average or even poor value but still decent satisfaction, i.e. you got what you paid for. Likewise, a club that had hot dancers could still lead to dissatisfaction, even though a club without any hot dancers would just about always be unsatisfactory for many, including me as i wouldn't waste any money on dancers in that scenario. But the biggest thing to me is that the satisfaction rating applies more to the visit than the club as this very subjective "rating" is often quite different on many visits to the same club...