How long is too long to post a review?
whodey
Fat bastard that can afford to fuck hot strippers
To me the whole point of reading reviews is to get current up to date info about a club. That's why I rarely read reviews older than 6 months when I am looking into clubs I am considering visiting. However, I just read and rejected a review that started like this:
"This review is from a visit quite a while ago - though I am not sure of the exact date, it was sometime in the 1980’s."
You may ask yourself how this is relevant over 30 years later - the answer is simple - from what I have heard from those gullible enough to go to the Dream Palace as well as what I have read in reviews on this and other sites, not much has changed."
I think we can all agree that a review written 3 DECADES after the author last visited the club is useless.
The question is how long is too long to wait to post a review?
I find that if I don't find the time to write the review within a week I don't bother writing it at all. However, I have approved reviews that were written a month or so after the visit as long as they still provide enough detail.
In my opinion anything written more than a month after the most recent visit it useless with as fast as some strip clubs change.
"This review is from a visit quite a while ago - though I am not sure of the exact date, it was sometime in the 1980’s."
You may ask yourself how this is relevant over 30 years later - the answer is simple - from what I have heard from those gullible enough to go to the Dream Palace as well as what I have read in reviews on this and other sites, not much has changed."
I think we can all agree that a review written 3 DECADES after the author last visited the club is useless.
The question is how long is too long to wait to post a review?
I find that if I don't find the time to write the review within a week I don't bother writing it at all. However, I have approved reviews that were written a month or so after the visit as long as they still provide enough detail.
In my opinion anything written more than a month after the most recent visit it useless with as fast as some strip clubs change.
14 comments
For me personally, if I’m going to write a review, I usually have it submitted within a few days after visiting. There are occasions where I will get busy and not submit a review until a week later. If the visit was more than a week ago, and I haven’t submitted a review, then I am just not going to submit a review for that visit, as it usually means the last visit was very much similar to the last review I wrote for that club.
The details of the (30 year old) experience might be entertaining, but the details could be posted in a discussion.
I think a month is probably as long as I’d wait. Some folks have better retention of details, so they might have all the detail needed (after a longer time).
I’d rather just get the details out - so I can move on to write of other experiences.
My intention is not to brag or gloat, but to highlight some flaws in present review approval system. I realize that no system is perfect, but like Whodey, Papi, etal, I've seen too many reviews slip through the cracks that were a no brainer rejection by me. Perhaps it's time to evaluate and refine present system.
My first idea would be to require more sets of eyes, and a higher acceptance percentage than is the case now. (3/5 or 60%). Instead, require 6 - 8 looks, with 4 - 6 approvals required for acceptance. (2/3 to 3/4 majority.) Secondly, require a minimum number of reviews submitted and length of Tuscl membership (say 10 to 20 reviews, 1 to 2 years Tuscl membership combined.) Maybe add on the requirement that at least 1 "senior" member (say 7 years or more member, 75 or more reviews.)
Prior to latest submission, I generally posted reviews within 1 to 30 days of club visit.
actually... that may be accurate.