How long is too long to post a review?
whodey
Fat bastard that can afford to fuck hot strippers
To me the whole point of reading reviews is to get current up to date info about a club. That's why I rarely read reviews older than 6 months when I am looking into clubs I am considering visiting. However, I just read and rejected a review that started like this:
"This review is from a visit quite a while ago - though I am not sure of the exact date, it was sometime in the 1980’s."
You may ask yourself how this is relevant over 30 years later - the answer is simple - from what I have heard from those gullible enough to go to the Dream Palace as well as what I have read in reviews on this and other sites, not much has changed."
I think we can all agree that a review written 3 DECADES after the author last visited the club is useless.
The question is how long is too long to wait to post a review?
I find that if I don't find the time to write the review within a week I don't bother writing it at all. However, I have approved reviews that were written a month or so after the visit as long as they still provide enough detail.
In my opinion anything written more than a month after the most recent visit it useless with as fast as some strip clubs change.
"This review is from a visit quite a while ago - though I am not sure of the exact date, it was sometime in the 1980’s."
You may ask yourself how this is relevant over 30 years later - the answer is simple - from what I have heard from those gullible enough to go to the Dream Palace as well as what I have read in reviews on this and other sites, not much has changed."
I think we can all agree that a review written 3 DECADES after the author last visited the club is useless.
The question is how long is too long to wait to post a review?
I find that if I don't find the time to write the review within a week I don't bother writing it at all. However, I have approved reviews that were written a month or so after the visit as long as they still provide enough detail.
In my opinion anything written more than a month after the most recent visit it useless with as fast as some strip clubs change.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
14 comments
For me personally, if I’m going to write a review, I usually have it submitted within a few days after visiting. There are occasions where I will get busy and not submit a review until a week later. If the visit was more than a week ago, and I haven’t submitted a review, then I am just not going to submit a review for that visit, as it usually means the last visit was very much similar to the last review I wrote for that club.
The details of the (30 year old) experience might be entertaining, but the details could be posted in a discussion.
I think a month is probably as long as I’d wait. Some folks have better retention of details, so they might have all the detail needed (after a longer time).
I’d rather just get the details out - so I can move on to write of other experiences.
My intention is not to brag or gloat, but to highlight some flaws in present review approval system. I realize that no system is perfect, but like Whodey, Papi, etal, I've seen too many reviews slip through the cracks that were a no brainer rejection by me. Perhaps it's time to evaluate and refine present system.
My first idea would be to require more sets of eyes, and a higher acceptance percentage than is the case now. (3/5 or 60%). Instead, require 6 - 8 looks, with 4 - 6 approvals required for acceptance. (2/3 to 3/4 majority.) Secondly, require a minimum number of reviews submitted and length of Tuscl membership (say 10 to 20 reviews, 1 to 2 years Tuscl membership combined.) Maybe add on the requirement that at least 1 "senior" member (say 7 years or more member, 75 or more reviews.)
Prior to latest submission, I generally posted reviews within 1 to 30 days of club visit.
actually... that may be accurate.