Didn't there used to be an automatic regulator requiring submission of at least 100 words or something? Or am I thinking of a different site? Either way, there should be just to deter this kind of thing:
"I know I should have just gone later in the day. Not the first time I've made this mistake.
Got there a bit after they opened, floor was pretty dead, the few dancers that around were cute but not really engaging or "into it". Decided against sticking around and getting a dance.
Lesson learned, don't bother with being there for open..."
Comments
last commentIn other words: "I went too early"
Doesn't even say WHAT TIME is too early for the club.
Log in to vote
9am?
Log in to vote
Yes. There did used to be a computer function to automatically reject short reviews. All other were published. Nobody was reading them. Now all reviews are being read by the VIP membership. Founder could still put in an automatic short rejection but I have seen a couple of short reviews that did need to be published. So leave it alone.
Log in to vote
I've rejected a few that were too short and not enough information. They were stripper reviews/stories and had no information about the club itself. C'mon people!
Log in to vote
A couple of days ago I saw a jackass that submitted a "review" which was just 2 short paragraphs with the 2nd paragraph just being a copy/paste of the 1st which makes me think the auto min length function is still there
Log in to vote
Read my reviews. They are a model of how to do it. Bless you my children
Log in to vote