More on crappy reviews

7/14/2018 6:33:05 AM

Didn't there used to be an automatic regulator requiring submission of at least 100 words or something? Or am I thinking of a different site? Either way, there should be just to deter this kind of thing:

"I know I should have just gone later in the day. Not the first time I've made this mistake.
Got there a bit after they opened, floor was pretty dead, the few dancers that around were cute but not really engaging or "into it". Decided against sticking around and getting a dance.
Lesson learned, don't bother with being there for open..."

6 comments

Latest

knight_errant

•

6 years ago

In other words: "I went too early"

Doesn't even say WHAT TIME is too early for the club.

shailynn

•

6 years ago

9am?

shadowcat

•

6 years ago

Yes. There did used to be a computer function to automatically reject short reviews. All other were published. Nobody was reading them. Now all reviews are being read by the VIP membership. Founder could still put in an automatic short rejection but I have seen a couple of short reviews that did need to be published. So leave it alone.

SirLapdancealot

•

6 years ago

I've rejected a few that were too short and not enough information. They were stripper reviews/stories and had no information about the club itself. C'mon people!

Papi_Chulo

•

6 years ago

A couple of days ago I saw a jackass that submitted a "review" which was just 2 short paragraphs with the 2nd paragraph just being a copy/paste of the 1st which makes me think the auto min length function is still there

BrotherFogHorn

•

6 years ago

Read my reviews. They are a model of how to do it. Bless you my children

You must be a member to leave a comment.Join Now

Got something to say?

Start your own discussion