Advertisement

More on crappy reviews

Jul 14, 2018, 6:33 AM
Avatar for knight_errant
knight_errant
New Jersey

Didn't there used to be an automatic regulator requiring submission of at least 100 words or something? Or am I thinking of a different site? Either way, there should be just to deter this kind of thing:

"I know I should have just gone later in the day. Not the first time I've made this mistake. Got there a bit after they opened, floor was pretty dead, the few dancers that around were cute but not really engaging or "into it". Decided against sticking around and getting a dance. Lesson learned, don't bother with being there for open..."

comments (6)

Jump to latest
Avatar for knight_errant
knight_errant

In other words: "I went too early"

Doesn't even say WHAT TIME is too early for the club.

Avatar for shailynn
shailynn

9am?

Avatar for shadowcat
shadowcat

Yes. There did used to be a computer function to automatically reject short reviews. All other were published. Nobody was reading them. Now all reviews are being read by the VIP membership. Founder could still put in an automatic short rejection but I have seen a couple of short reviews that did need to be published. So leave it alone.

Avatar for SirLapdanceanot
SirLapdanceanot

I've rejected a few that were too short and not enough information. They were stripper reviews/stories and had no information about the club itself. C'mon people!

Avatar for Papi_Chulo
Papi_Chulo

A couple of days ago I saw a jackass that submitted a "review" which was just 2 short paragraphs with the 2nd paragraph just being a copy/paste of the 1st which makes me think the auto min length function is still there

Avatar for BrotherFogHorn
BrotherFogHorn

Read my reviews. They are a model of how to do it. Bless you my children

Advertisement