Unpublished Review Tweaks
WillMunny
Awaiting the edit button since 2011....
For those who browse the unpublished reviews section and offer their input, looks like Founder has made some adjustments.
In addition to the "publish" or "reject" options, there's now a pre-set list of standardized reasons for rejection (not enough detail, too explicit, etc. - more than one option can be selected). Personally I see this as a great time-saver, as a number of folks have referenced the recurring nature of their reasons to reject reviews.
There"s still a text box to provide optional comments (or mandatory if rejecting without choosing any of the pre-selects). Not clear if any positive comments get posted to the review or reviewer, but I assume the rejection feedback is still shared.
One other "feature" I discovered is apparently there's a limit to how many reviews you can reject in succession (at least without giving input beyond the pre-selected options).
I assume this is to prevent "spam blocking" of reviews, but it was strange when I tried to reject one of several too-short reviews that I got a pop-up message saying "You can't handle the truth." Actually I can handle the truth just fine, thanks, it's garbage reviews I have no patience for...
In addition to the "publish" or "reject" options, there's now a pre-set list of standardized reasons for rejection (not enough detail, too explicit, etc. - more than one option can be selected). Personally I see this as a great time-saver, as a number of folks have referenced the recurring nature of their reasons to reject reviews.
There"s still a text box to provide optional comments (or mandatory if rejecting without choosing any of the pre-selects). Not clear if any positive comments get posted to the review or reviewer, but I assume the rejection feedback is still shared.
One other "feature" I discovered is apparently there's a limit to how many reviews you can reject in succession (at least without giving input beyond the pre-selected options).
I assume this is to prevent "spam blocking" of reviews, but it was strange when I tried to reject one of several too-short reviews that I got a pop-up message saying "You can't handle the truth." Actually I can handle the truth just fine, thanks, it's garbage reviews I have no patience for...
3 comments
Founder was not sending our comments relating to published reviews anyway, so forcing us to include them made no sense.
As to unpublished reviews, I am happy that I don't have to repeat the same obvious comments over and over. I do make ample use of the comment section to clarify when needed, but some reviews are so bad that it is just not worth the effort unless I feel like giving the reviewer a little shit for submitting such crap. I just wish that founder would include "Club/Dancer Advertisement" as one of the check box choices.