Butterfaces and butterbodies
theDirkDiggler
Illinois
I've done the dance with the "butterface" before, but the face is just too distracting to ever be a regular PL of hers. The butterbody on the other hand, once and never again. I instantly regretted it once the fat, rolls, buried pussy, and sweat and smell took over. Not super bad, but way more noticeable than the 9+s i prefer. And she wasn't obese either. Just very thick. Of course, some seem to have no problem with this type. DSDF.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
12 comments
Great face, unattractive body? Not me.
SJG
Since I was a kid, i was always more turned-on by a girl's/woman's body than the face.
I've turned down plenty of pretty-dancers b/c the bod didn't do much for me - but I have never turned down a dancer b/c of her face.
For me it's not about it being a buttabody or her body turning me-off, more of her-body not being my-type and just not moving the needle for me much.
When I visit Inner Room in Cocoa-Beach on dayshift, I see the old retiree white-men cum-in-their-pants when they see a spinner on-stage w/ no-tits nor ass; whereas for me I rather stare into space than her on-stage - I don't think she's unattractive, just does not do much for me.
But for the most part, i'm just very picky period usually requiring an 8+ to get a dance from them so they basically can't have worse than a 6 face or a 6 body (if i give near equal weight to both, and i do), and that's assuming they they are a 10 in the other area, which almost never happens period, regardless of what they are otherwise. So in most cases, their bodies or faces are usually 6.5+, realistically 7+, when the other area is noticeably more attractive.
http://i.ytimg.com/vi/o7IdbIaY-hI/hqdefa…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Dce8Dhr…
The face is very important, and the eye makeup makes a huge difference.
For me, a definite YES.
A lesser appealing video of her:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hFdVKLs…
SJG