Discussion Filter

19 comments

• RandomMember

  •

  7 years ago

  1
• RandomMember

  •

  7 years ago

  2
• RandomMember

  •

  7 years ago

  3
• RandomMember

  •

  7 years ago

  4
• RandomMember

  •

  7 years ago

  5
• RandomMember

  •

  7 years ago

  6
• RandomMember

  •

  7 years ago

  7
• RandomMember

  •

  7 years ago

  8
• RandomMember

  •

  7 years ago

  9
• RandomMember

  •

  7 years ago

  10
• 4got2wipe

  •

  7 years ago

  RandomMember seems to have discovered a flaw in your otherwise brilliant filtering criterion.
  
  But I understand why you had to come up with a strategy. Simply reading titles and avoiding threads that don't seem interesting could never work.
• realDougster

  •

  7 years ago

  Good plan. Now if we all followed this strategy...oh, wait
• crazyjoe

  •

  7 years ago

  ItsYourTimeToKissMyAss
• twentyfive

  •

  7 years ago

  ^^^ There’s your discussion filter.
  Perfect Joe +10
• Cashman1234

  •

  7 years ago

  It was foolproof until RandomMember was able to decrypt the code! That was brilliant!
• 79terrier

  •

  7 years ago

  Still doesn't protect you against topics that get hijacked....
• Warrior15

  •

  7 years ago

  I have the exact opposite filter. Most threads that go past 50 have broken down into arguments and have nothing to do with the initial subject.
• theDirkDiggler

  •

  7 years ago

  ^ Good observation... although i would say over 100 comments is usually where it just turns into shit flinging, and absolutely not worth it to even skim through all that.
• twentyfive

  •

  7 years ago

  My discussion filter is when I see two SJG posts in a row with no one posting below them it the end of the thread maybe we should petition @founder to close threads that have no more responses than SJGs ravings on and on.