Do you think strippers would get work done (CS) if they weren't stripping?

Of course there are plenty of women that get cosmetic surgery that never go into stripping or sex work. But i can't help but feel that many of the strippers that get it done tend to look at it as an investment and might not have done it if they weren't in the industry. They almost certainly wouldn't have been able to afford it or as much of it (a tangent on my "what do strippers spend their money on" discussion). Lot of the girls that say they are going to get their breasts done :(, say it's for them, but no one really sees a woman's bare breasts besides PLs and lovers, so i'm dubious when they say it's for them. I'm talking about generally decent to even great looking natural breasts that just might be a little smaller or saggier. Sometimes i've seen dancers with perky Ds get them done, SMH. If a woman truly has nothing (AAA cups or less) to work with, or empty socks on her chest, something like this could really bother her regardless of other people, but to do something to yourself for someone else just doesn't strike me as very sane. Even sadder is that their "investement" just tends to turn into a money pit as it often loses customers/regulars and they still have to often get them redone/replace/revised for almost the same amount of money later on.

I might sound like i'm singling BA, but i'm talking about all CS. Labiaplasty (which i think is the stupidest one; no sane guy would ever voluntarily have a knife put anywhere near his unsightly junk let alone pay thousands for it), and even butt implants and injections. The oversized donk seems to be a more recent fad, but fads don't last forever but the effects of CS often are life-long. The same could be said about tattoos which have already been discussed before as well as piercings. Then you have procedures like lip filling, botox and liposuction which are usually temporary, but still very expensive answers to questions never asked.