Georgia Adult clubs sue, calling new Georgia tax unconstitutional
shadowcat
Atlanta suburb
The Georgia Association of Club Executives filed a lawsuit in Fulton County Superior Court against Attorney General Chris Carr and Department of Revenue Commissioner Lynn Riley arguing that the tax is unconstitutional because it targets free speech — in this case, the nudity exhibited by adult entertainers.
“The tax is unconstitutional because it places a content-based tax on free speech of which certain members of the Legislature do not approve,” association Executive Director Jill Chambers said.
Carr’s office declined to comment.
The law, approved by Georgia voters in 2016, requires that adult entertainment businesses pay $500 or 1 percent of their gross revenue, whichever is more, to finance the Safe Harbor for Sexually Exploited Children Fund and a commission that oversees the fund, which is designed to provide care and social programs for victims.
The tax went into effect Jan. 1, with businesses scheduled to submit their first payment next April 30.
The bill aims to target bad actors and businesses that contribute to child sex trafficking, something Chambers said is not happening at adult clubs.
Chambers, a former Georgia lawmaker, said the members of her organization are offended that the law “lumps legitimate Georgia businesses” with those who are paying steeper penalties for sex crimes such as prostitution, pimping and masturbation for hire.
State law requires the business and all employees undergo a background check, confirming he or she is at least 18 years old, and be licensed. Attendees must be 21 and older. Chambers says strip clubs are not where those looking to lure children into sex trafficking rings target victims.
“They go to areas where children congregate,” she said. “Children do not congregate at adult clubs. … To be accused of such a heinous crime is unfair, and this is the way that the business owners are fighting back.”
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
8 comments
Latest
1) they are not gonna find enough trafficked victims to justify the amount of $$$ they are gonna collect
2) the $$$ will be mismanaged and/or re-directed towards something else
SJG
As someone below is about to find out!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M--lNIsz…
The way that the amendment was was worded gave the YES vote a great boost. Who is not against human trafficking? "Obviously if I can reduce human trafficking by voting YES it gets my vote. Obviously, if strip clubs now have to pay a huge tax, they must be responsible for the majority of human trafficking that takes place. I need to vote "YES".
It is curious to me that the legislature went with a constitutional amendment instead of just voting for a law within the "Gold Dome".
Yep good use of our tax dollars..............