On one hand you have meth head skinny with implants that fashion and Hollyweed loves with 'little boy butts' and the you have the enormous assed Kardashians, Iggy Azalea and all the other "pop" or poop icons. While I am not a fan of 'little boy butts' on girls and like a girl with some hips (34", 36", 38" or even 40" hips ok) but when you get into the coffee table size asses I'll pass. When my arm would disappear to the elbow between her rear cheeks it gets to be to much, or when she twerks it sounds like a gunshot and people duck for cover! What is your preference.
Front Room
7 comments
What is with the media's obsession with extreme looks on women.
Aug 21, 2017, 1:20 PM
comments (7)
If her ass is bigger than mine, I'm not interested.
I'm with shadowcat, except I don't know the size of his butt. Using my butt as reference I agree...
unfortunately the "little boy butt" is quite a bit more popular. I think more people should have minds of their own. I actually don't mind a nice non Kim kardashian sized butt-non little boy butt as long it comes with nice big tits and a pretty face. the "little boy butt" is quite gross. yuck.
Every year has it's it girl. I think some of it has to do with what looks good for the prevalent technology at the time. Maybe those girls look better in selfies and on instagram lol. I think high def tv has to be affecting it. I can see everyone pores now, so I'd think good skin could get more important.
I like the CNN gals like Kate B.
I agree with Bj99, technology probably has something to do with the preferences of the time. Economics, too, I'm told. During times of economic stress and uncertainty, apparently men will gravitate towards somewhat heftier women. Personally, I prefer big butts. Just the thought of a "little boy's butt" on a woman... just nasty.
What's with people extreme obsession with the media.
