How Many Find Women To Be Too Emotionally Explosive To Be Too Involved With, And

I pay them to fuck me and go away.

You pay them to cuddle and act as a therapist.

"act as a therapist"

No way!

SJG

No, I find both civilians and dancers not difficult to deal with at all.

Because, every guy has to find his way (comfortable in his own skin). Otherwise you have at least 2 options. The first, is to be a sexual anorexic, (like LM might be, I don't know him). Another option is to just go full homo. No thanks.

True indeed, and being comfortable in your own skin cannot be over emphasized.

But are you careful about the situations you get into with women, or with some women?

Ever had one who was just to erratic and explosive?

SJG

Civil women are worse bc they keep stuff in. Strippers are more open, and seem to be more accepting of imperfections, and willing to move on from stuff. I way prefer working w strippers. I don't leave valuables out, or invite them over, but I fine them easier to deal.

I don't think women in general are that difficult to deal with. They don't resort to violence with a gun as often as men do. They might get emotional but I think less violent overall. Most people if treated well, seem to behave reasonable, I would be more concerned with a guy on steroids or super pumped up with very high testerone rather than a sad girl. However an angry stripper could be a different story. When you add crazy into the equation like Kim versus Trump, anything could happen.

I find the OP's premise, that "women are too emotionally explosive to deal with", completely preposterous. Only monks and maricones think like that! I think normal men enjoy the company of women, and normal TUSCLers (if there is such a thing) especially enjoy the company of strippers.

How far along are you on building your organization?

Some people will no doubt take exception, but I have long been of the opinion that men and women simply have very little in common. We tend to enjoy different things, we want different things, we communicate somewhat differently, etc. And the equation doesn't really change much just because they're naked and dancing on a stage. Whenever I get a little bored, I sometimes try dating and I soon regret it; and I often regret my visits to strip clubs, too. There's no solution to this problem, and I'm not even sure it should be classified as a "problem" to begin with. It just is what it is. I bet some of you feel the same way, if you're really honest with yourselves. As for emotional explosiveness, I understand what you mean. Well, not about the "organization" plan thing, but I understand the rest of it. It is true that women are statistically less likely to commit acts of serious violence, but it's not because they are less violent, per se. It's probably because they learn at an early age that A) such behavior is not socially acceptable for women and therefore it won't help them to advance socially, and B) at any rate, such behavior is less likely to be effective in causing physical damage due to their relative physical weakness compared to men. So women learn to resort to passive-aggressive behavior instead. That's my opinion anyway.

After 35 years of divorce law I find women make more sense than guys do and that guys are the emotional basket cases. I recall maybe 4-5 stripper drama incidents in 40+ years and in almost 28 my wife and I have had one bad fight.

BJ69 wrote, "Civil women are worse bc they keep stuff in. Strippers are more open, and seem to be more accepting of imperfections, and willing to move on from stuff."

This does make sense. I think though it means that you are not getting into the same situations with strippers that most people get into with civvies.

BurlingtonHoFactory wrote, "Some people will no doubt take exception, but I have long been of the opinion that men and women simply have very little in common."

I go along with this, but the ramification is that you need to be more deliberate and careful about what kinds of situations you set up to put men and women together.

skibum609, your insight is interesting. I've seen evidence to suggest this myself, but I've also seen it the other way. And I have been in a much more conflicted marriage than yours.

JamesSD, I am fighting on, my organization is to be founded on some key political and legal victories. It is to be a scalp taking group, not a live and let live type of group. So I am active in conflicts on the ground on a daily basis. It is from this that I will get to move beyond the present small handful of people.

SJG

SJG's is going to be an all gay + all psycho organization.

I find BurlingtonHo's post to be spot on.

But I think it is more by social convention than that it has to be this way. But then it may be that most societies have always been something like this, many more so than ours.

The way I look at it, you have gender symmetrical situations, and you have gender complementary situations.

Most of our legal system is set up to be gender symmetrical, treating mean and women the same, as much as possible. And it is like this in most work places. And this is consistent with the self-actualization, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness values of the enlightenment.

But then consider that although things started to go uni-sex in the 1970's, most people do reject unisex dress or hair styles.

And then, were it is intended to promote heterosexual acts, you usually see even more differentiated manners of dress, and of conduct. Thinking of night clubs and parties.

And then the most gender differentiated places in the world are strip clubs. Everything is complementary, never symmetrical.

And so then with car keys and wallet dating, it is mostly complementary. It works because there are outside defined codes of conduct. If it ever falls outside such, that is when dates have been know to blow up.

And then for example with my marriage, for it to have worked there would have needed to have been outside social supports. And this would have made it more gender complementary. But this was not there, so it had to be a private partnership, and this did not really ever come to exist.

And then in the organization I am building, there are basic protections on dignity and personhood, and then there are types of training. These are mostly gender symmetric.

But for the sexual parties, that is all gender complementary. No money, but in every other way it is like the idealized strip club / swinger's club.

Some agreed to gender complimentary seems to be the key to sex.

But to protect basic rights you need it to be gender symmetric.

And so this is why it is okay to come on to women in some situations, but not others.

About men and women not having much in common, well they have very different types of social position and life courses.

I was always impressed that San Jose's Rosicrucian Order AMORC seemed to attract about equal numbers of men and women, and not being dominated by married couples either. Most stuff is always slanted either one way or the other.

My ex wife always said that women don't know about this or know about that. Once it was about using a hand push reel lawn mower. Other times about automobile repair.

She insisted that women did not have the requisite knowledge or bodily strength.

I tried to show her how one learns to compensate for this, and how tools are designed to compensate this. I told her of body builders who had arms so thick they they could do brake work, but not engine work. I told her of learning to use a lawn mower when I was much smaller than an adult woman.

http://transmissionsbylucille.com/aboutu…

I suggested that long hair was an issue, as was the cultural taboo against getting dirty.

But what I emphasized is that what women cannot do or do not know about is mostly because they have never tried. For some reason they think that they should not try, that they would lose more than they would gain.

And so again, this is a gender complementarity issue.

Some say that many women are willing to learn to maintain bicycles. But motor vehicles, no way.

I do note that the recent decades have brought more women into school team sports. And I don't necessarily see this is a good thing, rather it promotes social conformity, and capitalism.

And I see more men in the kitchen, and more spending more time taking care of small children.

And if I wanted to be in extremely negative and anti-sexual gender defined environments, then I would go find a church like ATACdawg's

SJG

Ice Cold Themes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVQ8lpPu…

BurlingtonHo wrote, "...I have long been of the opinion that men and women simply have very little in common."

and

"Whenever I get a little bored, I sometimes try dating and I soon regret it; and I often regret my visits to strip clubs, too."

And what I draw from this is that in situations where men and women can get along, its because there are outside scripts being drawn upon and followed, roles being played.

And then in long term relationships, which often are very difficult and especially marriages, more often than not failing, its because our society validates some people's life experiences and not others.

And so again about colleges:
https://www.tuscl.net/?page=post&id=5066…

And About Elliot Rodger and the PUA - MGTOW people:
https://www.tuscl.net/?page=post&id=5119…

And about college educated women out in the 'real world'
https://www.tuscl.net/?page=post&id=5141…

Our society has always been based on lied, denial, and deception. And so when it comes to heterosexual relationships, given that the men and women don't have much in common, some will be favored in playing these externally defined roles and some will not. It is not that the people are bad, it is just that our society has not favored them as it runs on lies and denial.

SJG

Moriarty NM, Truck Stop with a Stripper Pole
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHlDo3Zj…

Lot Lizards
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C0B5aTzK…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lqxgv8bK…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7EeJzpmk…

Steve Winwood, Eric Clapton - Can't Find My Way Home
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VT-SFgkV…

Steve Winwood - Dear Mr. Fantasy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DYC61Hz…

Steve Winwood - I'm a Man - Jools Holland Big Band
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5k-ofsL…