I guess flagging reviews is a waste of time!
sflguy123
Florida
I'm not the type to normally flag a review as I'm not beyond lying myself for an added benefit but at least I will put some effort into it.
Example #1:
Dude cuts and paste the same review by himself 2 additional times. The only reason I was suspect was he was careless enough to copy his profile at the beginning of the most recent review. It was quite obvious.
https://www.tuscl.net/u-r.php?UID=292682
Example #2:
https://www.tuscl.net/stripclubreviews.p…
Second review today(6/15) in the first sentence he has the club name wrong(BT instead of Coliseum)
https://www.tuscl.net/stripclubreviews.p…
Guess what he copied it from someone else who reviewed BT on 6/13. I only noticed this one b/c I remembered reading it a few days ago.
Again I'm normally not one to snitch but when they are like these examples I feel guility if I don't and then nothing comes of it.
Just like people on wikipedia will correct errors, when a member points out an obvious BS review it s/b removed.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
11 comments
Latest
The other thing I noticed in both cases were they had exactly zero comments and only a few reviews. Most bogus.
The way to view Flags is the same way to view Props – I’m able to see Prop comments but have not been able to view Flag comments for a while now (although I used to be able to).
Perhaps Founder may not display the Flag comments anymore in order to avoid retribution as in Otto’s case?
I think the Founder or whomever edits things does a pretty good job, given the volume of reviews and the prevalence of scumbaggery in the ownership and management ranks of strip clubs. I'm actually surprised that it works as well as it does.