tuscl

Cheating

Avatar for motorhead
motorheadFat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life

Mr Winkle's thread raised a question about being faithful to your S/O.

But perhaps we need to back-up and define the parameters. How do you define cheating?

Some say only vaginal intercourse is cheating. On the other extreme some feel talking with someone on Facebook might be cheating. I think it obviously falls somewhere in between.

Flirting, texting, masturbation, porn?
Going to a strip club? Getting a dance? A handjob?

Where's the line in the sand?

Comments

last comment
Avatar for boogieknight369
boogieknight369

It's not cheating if you pay for it.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for crazyjoe
crazyjoe

If you usually jack off with your right hand is it cheating if you use your left hand?

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for ilbbaicnl
ilbbaicnl

Simple, if you have to lie about it to your SO, it's cheating.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for gawker
gawker

After an affair many years ago, my s/o said do what you want to do, but don't rub my nose in it. Since then I've rubbed MY nose in it whenever I could.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for georgmicrodong
georgmicrodong

It ain't cheating if you never promised not to...

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for goodsouthernboy
goodsouthernboy

What ilbbi said. Not that I've (n)ever done anything that I've needed to lie about. We've all got flaws right?

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for sclvr5005
sclvr5005

yup....what ilbbaicnl said .

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for motorhead
motorhead

I like all the answers

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for jester214
jester214

If I had to hide it or it was emotional I consider it cheating. Paying for it, no.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for Alucard
Alucard

IMHO a person of either gender has crossed the line of Cheating/Infidelity when in their mind & heart they decide that their Spouse/S.O. is NOT fulfilling some or all of their physical sexual needs/desires and their emotional needs/desires. And then the person goes out to find another person[s] to meet those needs & desires and has the person[s] meet those needs/desires in some manner.

Part of where the line in the sand is drawn is where the Spouse/S.O. decides the line belongs & also where Society decides where the line is drawn. [this relates to marriage, as there are divorce laws]

IMHO it is wrong to betray the trust placed in you by your Spouse/S.O. and to screw around.
IMHO don't marry if you need to screw around constantly or divorce. Don't enter into a committed serious relationship if you need to constantly screw around.
My 99¢ worth. I'm sure there will be a lot of flack against my opinion about Cheating/Infidelity.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for jester214
jester214

Given that you're not in any relationship and regularly engage in activity with some who might be for money I can't understand why anymore might question your viewpoint.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for shadowcat
shadowcat

ilbbaicn +1

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for fastscrs
fastscrs

If there's emotional involvement it's cheating. Fulfilling a physical need, no.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for duomaxwell
duomaxwell

Saying that you're just fulfilling a physical need/paying for it = not cheating is faulty logic. If you can't be honest about it to your S/O it's probably because you know they'd be upset about it. Think of it this way: if your S/O was getting her physical needs fulfilled by someone else you'd probably be upset about it on one level or another.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for Alucard
Alucard

"Fulfilling a physical need, no."

WRONG imo.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for SlickSpic
SlickSpic

If I end up drinking whiskey and writing depressing songs, that means you cheated on me.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for shadowcat
shadowcat
0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for Ermita_Nights
Ermita_Nights

Hold on, let me call Bill Clinton and ask him.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for Papi_Chulo
Papi_Chulo

It’s not “cheating” – it’s just that you have too much love to give for just one person :)

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for SlickSpic
SlickSpic

If it wasn't for cheating, music would suck.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for jester214
jester214

I disagree Duo. If I found out a GF while 800 miles away met a stranger who she would never see again, who she didn't care about, and they groped and grinded on each other I wouldn't care. Nor would I really care for her to come tell me about it.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for Alucard
Alucard

You guys can make all the jokes & excuses you want.

I stand by my POV on this issue & believe that if you BETRAY the trust placed in you physically\emotionally then you have "CHEATED" and are totally WRONG!

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for sclvr5005
sclvr5005

As far as the physical act of cheating I used to think that any exchange of bodily fluids constituted cheating. But I had to rethink that the last time I got a thru the pants HJ. So now my definition of physical cheating is if you come. Then in my mind its cheating. I know others will disagree but there it is.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for Dougster
Dougster

I have a question related to this subject -

How about the antics of the RickyBoyDugan who is on the record as saying he "generally" will participate in BBFS when it is offered. All this despite the fact that he is married, his wife is completely in the dark and the RickyBoy is conpletely aware of the increased risk it puts his wife at for STDs and cervical cancer as caused by HPV.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for Dougster
Dougster

@jestie - maybe alutard's mother cheated on his father or vice-versa so it's not just akin to him speculating how many angels can dance on the head of a pin?

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for Dougsterr
Dougsterr

Let's see so far in this thread I've attacked 3 members without provokation. But that's just the kind of cheesedick coward that I am. It's all I have to do since I obviously have no life and live to post stupidity on this forum.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for JuiceBox69
JuiceBox69

What's the definition of the word "I"

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for jester214
jester214

Do you do a thorough background check on the women you pay to make sure they're single Alucard?

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for two4fun1225
two4fun1225

Any act with a person other that your s/o without your s/o knowledge is considered cheating INMO

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for EarlTee
EarlTee

"Simple, if you have to lie about it to your SO, it's cheating."

So, I'm in the supermarket, I double back and to aisle 3 again to get another look at the tits on that 20-year old. My SO asks me why I went back to aisle 3, and to spare her feelings, I lie. Cheating?

"their Spouse/S.O. is NOT fulfilling some or all of their physical sexual needs/desires and their emotional needs/desires"

My SO has a shitty sense of humor. It fulfills an emotional need of mine to hang out with my male friends and act stupid. Cheating?

"Any act with a person other that your s/o without your s/o knowledge is considered cheating"

I gave the cashier money for a pack of gum. My SO doesn't know. Cheating?

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for Alucard
Alucard

" - "their Spouse/S.O. is NOT fulfilling some or all of their physical sexual needs/desires and their emotional needs/desires"

My SO has a shitty sense of humor. It fulfills an emotional need of mine to hang out with my male friends and act stupid. Cheating?"

If you are physical with a dancer, yes.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for jester214
jester214

Notice he didn't answer my question.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for Clubber
Clubber

It isn't cheating until you get caught!

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for Dougster
Dougster

@jestie: alutard never backs his position with facts or logic or responds to challenges to do so. Not will he respond to people who to anyone who points out problems with opinions. In alutard's "mind" people should take his opinions as holy utterances and just not question. Alutard feels responding would impair the self-evident nature of his utterances and he would not drag them down to such a level.

Responding would also show that alutard was not supremely confident in their self-evidentiary nature, so alutard, instead, elects to just not respond, show that confidence, and know that his confidence in his own beliefs will quickly spread to any doubters.

0
0

Log in to vote

Want to add a comment?