Pretty impressed with a certain dancer I met a few months ago. Shes 5'5 130 and leg presses 200lbs(not sure how many times) Thats probably more than I can do. lol She looks a bit like a wrestler from TNA. Good stuff.
Pretty impressed with a certain dancer I met a few months ago. Shes 5'5 130 and leg presses 200lbs(not sure how many times) Thats probably more than I can do. lol She looks a bit like a wrestler from TNA. Good stuff.
Comments
last commentI love athletic women. Especially when my head gets crushed between her thighs.
Log in to vote
I love women built like that and nothing beats a great wrasslin' session with 'em!
Log in to vote
Neon! How are were you impressed?
Log in to vote
200 lbs. for a leg press in not that much – it is ~ 4 45-lb plates (two on each side of the machine) – I am assuming the leg press is when you are sitting on a machine and pushing the weight by pressing w/ your feet against a board.
I work out @ LA Fitness and have seem plenty of chicks do this weight and sometimes more (200 lbs. squatting would really say something since that is much harder).
I am also not into “athletic chicksâ€. I don’t find the low body fat look attractive nor feminine – personally. I prefer my women with nice curves and nice curves often require a certain amount of fat.
Log in to vote
Whatever turns you on! ;)
Log in to vote
Maybe she could play nose tackle for Rex Ryan
Log in to vote
I think I could leg press at least 500 pounds my first time trying it. I agree 200 doesn't sound like much. I knew someone who could leg press over 1000 pounds no problem. I thought he said 2000 but don't remember. He was one big guy who could break furniture just by sitting on it. He actually made my car tilt when he got in it.
Log in to vote
I guess for a light weight dancer 200 might be good.
Log in to vote
For 5'5" and 130 lbs I think a 200lb leg press ain't half bad.
Log in to vote
People can do thousands on a leg press, mostly because they aren't doing them properly.
Log in to vote
There is nothing worse than a woman with zero definition to her body. Now I agree with Papi Chulo that a curvy/shapely girl is very hot. However, I also think that someone with no muscular definition whatsoever is NOT attractive. I mean, a tummy with no definition at all? Not good. I want to see at least a little bit of abs. And legs that are basically shapeless sticks or tree trunks? Nope. Gotta have some shape and muscular definition to them.
I especially despise these pale Japanese girls with no muscular definition to their faces or bodies. I mean geez, what's to be interested in?
Now on the other hand, I think I'm different from most guys in that I prefer girls who are bordering on being fitness models, with REAL muscular definition. Now the girls who are weight lifters and serious bodybuilders who have these overdone muscles and all of that shit is just wrong, looks too manly. But a tight, toned girl with good definition is awesome. I'm talking somebody like Ashley Lawrence (aka "Fembomb"). Fucking hottest thing in high heels.
Log in to vote
I like a gymnast look, after they are too old to compete anymore. So thats usually around 19-22 years old. They are typically athletic but still have nice curves. Only downside is tits sometimes are a bit small. However, their aggresive dances and flexible bodies make up for it.
Log in to vote
There was a dancer at Centerfolds in Seattle a few years ago that really was a dancer. Tall blondish with legs to die for, butther face, B cup, and could stand with her foot on the floor next to the pole and put her other foot on the pole and touch her pussy to the pole. Or strand flat footed and touch her leg to her nose. Unfortunately she gave mediocre dances as she was working at the club while trying to get a real dancing gig butt her face was a problem.
Log in to vote