"Lifers" or "Cherry Pickers": Which Are Better In Your Experience ?

13 comments

• boogieknight369

  •

  12 years ago

  lifers. without question. they know how to hook regulars and they're not so caught up on cost or song count. example; I took a gorgeous older Asian (early-mid 30 s) in back once. this chick was stunning. I told her to stop when I spent $100. I was just looking for dances and this club they were $25 per song, so I'm expecting 4 songs. at the end of 4 songs, with some light kissing and lots of 2 way contact, she's still goin. I tell her Agaian to stop when I spent $100. she looks me in the eye, kisses me, and says, don't worry, you got 2 more.
  
  that being said, younger, newer girls have a tendency to forget it's a job and they develop crushes giving you free or cheap shit.
  
  in other words, fuck if I know which I prefer!
• Clackport

  •

  12 years ago

  The lifers are the better experience for me. They get comfortable with being whores. Getting nasty in the VIP becomes like a everyday thing to them. It's great for the customers.
  
  The cherry pickers will try to act like they're not whores. LOL
• Alucard

  •

  12 years ago

  Experienced older 30's something dancers. Youngsters are generally TOO immature and inexperienced.
• staxwell

  •

  12 years ago

  Lifers know things. You can see it in their eyes. They're good with their hands; know just where to put them.
  
  Cherry pickers are fun, and like weed. Sometimes they even sell it. And their schedules make them easy to hangout with on random days where you might not have much happening.
• looneylarry

  •

  12 years ago

  I do think that cherry pickers are better. The really good dancers can set their own schedules and get away with more stuff. Management knows that these girls are magnets and they put up with it. Cherry pickers can be accomplished in their techniques and often are riding a circuit. Some even blow into town and dance at club X for a week or two and then move on to the next town. How can a girl be at the club 7 days a week for months and months and not have it affect her?
• motorhead

  •

  12 years ago

  I like Cherry Lifesavers
• lopaw

  •

  12 years ago

  Although I tend to chase after the cherry pickers, most dependable extras are usually provided by the lifers. They've been around awhile and know the game. And after working at the same club for awhile they know who to bribe and generally how to get away with murder.
• shadowcat

  •

  12 years ago

  Currently I would have to say Cherry pickers but that is only because most of my favorites are not there everyday. But it has been the other way around and could easily go back to lifers.
  
  As far as youger vs older goes, again right now younger are beating the pants off of the older ones.
• looneylarry

  •

  12 years ago

  "beating the pants off of". Yes. Good imagery. Young girls beating the pants off of MILFs. Maybe getting their own pants beat off. Lots of smacking and ass slapping and skin and. . .Excuse me a moment.
• WOODDR2

  •

  12 years ago

  I like Cherry Lifesavers in my opinion. Because they only work a couple days a week they tend not to be so worn out like the girls at work everyday.
• 3LeggedMan

  •

  12 years ago

  Gotta say I normally prefer the regulars that will be predictably on site when you need them. For me that's usually meant ladies aged 30-40, but recently most of my dance $$$ have been going to a hot 20-yo AA spinner.
• Papi_Chulo

  •

  12 years ago

  When I saw the thread’s title, I thought it might be w.r.t. older vs. younger dancers – but w.r.t. the OP’s narrative, I would go w/ the OP and others that say that cherries are often less burned out and often less cynical w.r.t. the game.
  
  I recall a thread a while ago asking if money was no object, would you SC everyday (or almost every day). Most TUSCLers responded they would get burned out and maybe even sick of it if they SCed almost every day – so one would think dancers get burned out and sick of the long term SC thing.
  
  I think the narrative would apply to any job – i.e. If you only have to work every now and then, or when you choose to, you too would probably be less burned out and have a better attitude towards your job?
  
  
• georgmicrodong

  •

  12 years ago

  I don't know if I could give one or the other a definitive edge over the other. I've had so many good experiences with both that I don't see much difference. Yeah, the older ones are skillful, and tend to get to business without a lot of beating around the bush, but the younger ones are just so enthusiastic on average, and hot, that it seems pretty much a wash to me.