LA County to Create a Condom Vault?
samsung1
Ohio
LOS ANGELES—It's not like anyone has anything else to worry about in Los Angeles County, but the Los Angeles Times is reporting that county officials are preparing to swing into military style action to "confront" the challenge posed by enforcing the mandatory condom provisions contained in Measure B, which was approved by voters Tuesday.
Few who voted for B probably understood the scale of work that will need to be accomplished in order to keep county citizens safe from the "epidemic" of STDs that apparently flow unfiltered from porn sets into their homes (and bodies), but the Times has spelled it out in gruesome detail.
"The county," it reported, "has said the law, pushed by AIDS activists concerned about disease outbreaks, forces the establishment of a new bureaucracy complete with inspection schedules, a permitting process, a training program for dealing with bodily fluids and a special vault for evidence seized from movie sets. County employees could even be called upon to screen X-rated titles for condom compliance."
Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky, a veteran pol if there ever was one, understands the limitations faced by the county and the truth of the situation. He told the Times it will be "difficult for the county to enforce the law because many porn shoots occur in private homes and are never registered with authorities." Still, he added, the voters have spoken and the county is obliged to comply.
But a special vault? For condoms? Ejaculate? Rubber gloves? Used dental dams?! What exactly is going into that vault, and why? To hold evidence for use in prosecutions? Are they kidding? Will this vault be aboveground or built into a mountain? How will the "evidence" be transported to this special vault, and will the citizens of Los Angeles be safe with this hazardous material being transported on public roadways? What if there's a spill? Should we look into hazmat suits anyway? Will the Nuclear Regulatory Commission play a role in any of this? Are drones involved? Is there an FAQ somewhere that answers any of this?
No matter how you feel about adult performers and condoms, the spectacle of a county in dire financial straits creating a "new bureaucracy" to police the use of condoms is insanely surreal. Let's not forget that this is very same county that announced this April that budget cuts have forced it to "ration justice" by closing 56 courtrooms—including 24 civil, 24 criminal, three family, one probate, and four juvenile delinquency courts—and lay off 350 people in addition to the 329 laid off over the past two years.
Now, it may be that creating a new condom enforcement bureaucracy to protect against an epidemic that the public was not aware existed until Measure B told them trumps keeping 56 courtrooms open, but only if you are Michael Weinstein on mescaline. He, by the way, also veered into the surreal yesterday when he scolded county supervisors for being concerned about enforcement.
“If you have a hot dog stand, you apply for a permit and periodically a health inspector comes out and determines whether you're operating safely, so you don't give food poisoning to people,†he said. “We have 134 businesses that require county permits. Why is this so exotic?â€
It's the same as a hot dog stand? Needless to say, Weinstein, who has become increasingly Romneyesque in what he is willing to tell the press, was either being conveniently dense or lying through his teeth by claiming that periodic health inspections at businesses will be sufficient to enforce a provision that targets activity that takes place on sets and in private homes.
But then this is the same fellow who also told the Times that enforcement should be a walk in the park because "the county has required sex clubs and bathhouses to obtain government permits since 2006," failing to note that neither are required under penalty of jail to make sure every patron uses a condom, like with B. They just have to make them available!
Ah, mendacity.
http://business.avn.com/articles/legal/L…
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
10 comments
Latest
Don't they realize production companies will simply move?
Typical California government. Socialist, inefficient, and stupid. No wonder they are about to go under.
Los Angeles City Council declares all future Mondays to be 'meatless'
The Los Angeles City Council has declared every Monday to be a so-called 'meatless Monday,' and is urging all residents to participate in the weekly day of vegetarianism.
NBC Los Angeles reports that with the vote Los Angeles has become the largest city to embrace the Meatless Monday campaign, a nonprofit with the goal of cutting down on meat consumption for health and environmental reasons.
Neither city officials nor law enforcement will be allowed to force residents to not eat meat, The Los Angeles Daily News reports. Rather, the resolution is meant to encourage residents to not eat meat once a week in the hopes of starting a city-wide trend.
Councilwoman Jan Perry, who has pushed for a ban on new fast-food restaurants in South Los Angeles, said the resolution is part of an overall "good food" agenda for the city.
"We can reduce saturated fats and reduce the risk of heart disease by 19 percent," Perry said according to the Los Angeles Daily News. "While this is a symbolic gesture, it is asking people to think about the food choices they make. Eating less meat can reverse some of our nation's most common illnesses."
Seems the entire state should be declared BRAINLESS, every day!
SURE glad I don't club in California!
They will likely just move the shoots to Nevada or Arizona and copy and distribute from Cali.
Alucard - While California is certainly fucked up on many levels, clubbing here in LA has many perks - mileage options off the charts, for starters.