In another thread, one poster mentioned that men differentiate between lust and love. I submit that is not mutually exclusive and that it is entirely possible for both to be in place with one person. Nor do I believe that this is solely a male differentiation. So, your thoughts?
I agree moots....male and female both lust and love very much and its very healthy to do both.....also I do believe one can be in lust and love with the same person.....but I would add that lust would be very emotional and sexual....but that's because I believe in mental lust and love as well as the physical......and I see love as yes emotional as well but I like to place it as a life chice one has made to give in an unconditional manner to another person...hence the good the bad and the ugly you still love your partner until death mentaly spirtualy and physicaly......but that is just how juice sees thangs threw my world views
I'd say "Love" is more of a long, perhaps endless "slow fire burn", whereas "Lust" is an "intense passionate flame" burst with inherent shelf life......sometimes, when we're lucky these forces collide....
Stiletto Babe, you're such a sweetheart and the kind of girl that evokes/ignites the forces described by the theme of this thread....Wish we had women like you in the Northeast love......
17 comments
Latest
I'd say "Love" is more of a long, perhaps endless "slow fire burn", whereas "Lust" is an "intense passionate flame" burst with inherent shelf life......sometimes, when we're lucky these forces collide....
Lust and I are close companions.
Juice - love, love, love your answer. And now I am going to call a therapist because I agree with everything you said. :-)
Moot.....: ) its going to be ok ! Lol
Moot.....: ) its going to be ok ! Lol
Juice, lol, what's up with the emphasizing of posts lately...
But only only in the 'real world'. In strip clubs, only lust exists. I believe in lust at first sight but NOT love at first sight.