Star Rating System?

16 comments

• troop

  •

  13 years ago

  ah ok, i just checked and i see that the clubs still have the old 1-10 ratings too.
• JerseyJack

  •

  13 years ago

  I don't have a problem with using star ratings vs. numerical ratings, but I really would prefer to see Founder do away with the single "overall rating" for a club and show the average ratings for each of the three categories (Physical Club, Dancer Quality and Dollar Value) at the top of each club's page. Merging the three together, in my opinion, skews the ratings because there's no relation from each category to the other two. There are some dumps that have really hot dancers, but that type of information gets lost when you combine the rating for the Physical Club with Dancer Quality and Dollar Value.
• samsung1

  •

  13 years ago

  I like shadowcat's comment in another post "what's next. G, PG, pG13, R, XXX"
• vincemichaels

  •

  13 years ago

  Ditto, with shadowcat. I won't go to a PG rated club. LOL
• Digitech

  •

  13 years ago

  Interesting idea. I guess 'G' would be a normal restaurant or bar that happens to have attractive women there. 'PG' would be a place like Hooters, with teasing but no actual nudity. PG-13 could be a bikini or topless club with minimal contact during lapdance. R could be a full-nude club which allows mutual touching and maybe HJs going on. XXX could be the psuedo-brothel clubs, like in East St. Louis or Detroit or wherever.
• gatorfan

  •

  13 years ago

  Why dont the number of stars equal the rating?
• CTQWERTY

  •

  13 years ago

  Or, why not some type of animated penis? Fully erect for a club receiving a 10 rating, flacid state for a 1 rating.
• samsung1

  •

  13 years ago

  lol ctq, I would not want to see dozens of penises every time i logged in this site...maybe breast size
• samsung1

  •

  13 years ago

  (A} Almost Boobs… {B} Barely there. {C} Can’t Complain! {D} Dang! {DD}Double dang! {E} Enormous! {F} Fake {G} Get a Reduction. {H} Help me, I’ve fallen and I can’t get up !
• troop

  •

  13 years ago

  ^^ lmao at those ratings! and ct, i think screw magazine used the soft/stiff penis ratings years ago, hell, maybe it still does if it's still being published.
• Clubber

  •

  13 years ago

  I can certainly live with most of the recent changes, but I do miss the post count of members in this forum. Makes it easier for me to pinpoint ones credibility.
• sharkhunter

  •

  13 years ago

  I like the number rating a whole lot better. I think the stars suck.
• sharkhunter

  •

  13 years ago

  Maybe it's time to change my name again so no one knows who I am. Lol, with me not posting here much anymore, it will be like the star rating system. More vague and less substance but much cleaner because there isn't much associated with it.
• Raincoat

  •

  13 years ago

  I have always been a proponent of using the following categories: Facility Quality: 8 Dancer Quality: 8 Private Dance Quality: 8 Mood: 6 Value: 8 Avg Rating: 7.4
• georgmicrodong

  •

  13 years ago

  More subjective numbers won't, IMO, add much actual value.
• troop

  •

  13 years ago

  well i like to check ratings but after being in some dives full of dogs that i would rate in the 3 range and seeing other guys rating them 8s i can't put much stock in ratings. they're just too subjective plus there's always the shill factor.