Comments by future POTUS and Senator in training (page 44)

Ok it was exaggerating but if rather do a biziiliion things before hooking up lol

Shit sry...didn't mean 2 offend any1 who doesn't like bacon LOL

didn't mean to say its pathetic that men would rather pay for rather than earn a woman's attention, but rather that its pathetic that all clubbing customers care about to be happy is that the girl performs physically for them, not if she actually likes you or wanta to do it. Sure u can pay for a girl to do the act but the fact that you guys are able to GET OFF WITHOUT KNOWLEDGE OF IF THE WOMAN ACTUALLY ENOYS AN ACT WHICH IS INHENRRLTY SUPPOSED TO BE ENJOYABLE FOR ALL PARTIES INVOLVED IS A FOREIGN CONCEPT 2 ME.LOL.

LOL I am queen of flirting dont need to improve on anything :p

The person who says in.not intelligent enough to do xyz isn't intelligent enough to refrain from making hypocritical comments that hold no merit, and is thus not intelligent enough to be minimally intelligent.

@skibum look whos talking u hypocritical b*tch lol...ur comments have no merit when you do worse things (i.g whine about ppl on tche basis of race and political beliefs) than the things u criticize me for doing.

Fratty guys are cute as fuck & fun to talk to..but some of them are annoying at what can I say LOL

Umm no just one @ time lol

Well I meant that women don't cry when drunk over like really dumb things ..and I would say that men don't do that either.

Similarly **

@nidan SIMILALY, BY YOUR VERY OWN LOGIC, women do not cry. That is for girls to do.

Ok btw I'm just sating my opinion. Due to feeling in a rush I May have soundes like my opinion was authoritative in earlier comment, but I did not mean 4 it to be

Is it weird if I hear guys talking In fratty voices ******? Btw. There are two typws of fratty voices in my opinion Soph/fresh fratty voices : very loud, just obnoxious. Sounds like they think they own the place. Jr/senior: cocky, but low tone. These guys trnd to be more douchey, but they're voices arent as annoying.lol. I'm.referring to type 1

Well if she enjoys the dances yes..I like going 2 clubs cuz the girls are pretty anf its cool but i dont buy services . Because I don't buy services, I don't go often and when I do its only like for an hour or two and tip sooo no I'm not making "the dancers mad " by doing so

Yes it would I'm sorry...I don't get how ppl can get high off of buying ppl I find that objectifying

bc we think that men who ENJOY paying for RATHER THAN EARNING a woman's attention is pathETIC***

Hey skibum if u wanna dispute ur personal opinions of me rather than the content of my msg maybe kindergarten is the place 4 u rather than this forum

I mean , I would definitely advocate for a world that still gives out GRADES, assigns class rank, but doesn't give out jobs on the basis of them(unless its medicine and maybe law)

I.g youve already lost half the battle the moment you feel inadequate and therefore a need to prove yourself.

The root of the issue is that they think they need to get A's . the moment they accept that, they feel the need to study for validation , rather than self growth. Kids need to be inspired by school..not forced to perform for it. They need to be mentored how to embrace academic challenges

Like i said lol: The best jobs shouldn't go to the kids who ernt to xyz school, but the ppl who can do well on the job, which arent always kids from xyz school. HOWEVER, "A" GRADES SHOULD STILL GO TO THE KIDS WHO ARE CAPABLE OF ACHIEVING THEM. When I said I want "them to b the competition " In the title, I didn't mean that to imply that they need to think they need to be at the top. Kids don't need to be at the top and make Xyz GRADES..what they need to do is work as hard as they are comfortable with and assess themselves accordingly. The only logical thing ji u can control aren't even u abilities, but rather ur efforts. As a result, we should teach our kifs to judge themselves by their efforts(i.g. did I study smart /hard ? Did I study as best as I possibly could which is the only thing that matters?) "Being the competition" means that you strive for the best , for yourself only , ANd that u judge your merits according to the efforts you put into your results.

3.86 plus ****

That's true. I'm not advocating for "aim for the top" and you're less if you don't get in. Honestly I maintained a 3.8 plus gpa first two yrs of undergrad (before it tanked when I was first diagnosed with bipolar..working on it tho) and that's cuz I picked the classes that I KNEW I would succeed in..they werent like basket weaving, but I won half of my undergrad because I was able to find an intersection between my academic strengths and classes offered. So as a mom I would encourage my kids to really just do what works for them but also work hard to do their very best...and I mean that seriously lol. Thus, the point of me just now mentioning my stats and ultimately this post is to address false assumptions. For instance: 1) just because you didn't get in doesn't mean that you tried u best and failed.some,if not many ppl play victim by saying "the system is unfair" after failing to get xyz stats did not put in the work. 2) its a different story if you actually did put in the work but don't get into xyz. This happens many times. In that case, the person who did everything should never blame themselves or be sad 3) as a result, efforts should be assessed on a case by case basis. ..you did ur best but still got a C? That's fine ..you logically can't do more than ur very best BUT BY GOD LOL, PLEASE DO NOT PUT IN 85% EFFORT(WAITing TILL THE WEEK BEFORE EXAM TO UNDERSTAND SHIT THAT U DONT LOL, etc ) ..get a B or C, and say that "the system is unfair" do we say that basketball as a whole Is unfair just because the game of it may cater more to Steph curry's natural abilities than klay Thompson's? No. The system is unfair in that it it gives the best jobs to ppl with the highest test scores , which isn't fair cuz those two don't correlate. However , too many ppl complain that the system is unfair because it measures performance and not learning . fuck that. You think the cavliers deserved the mba championship just because they "improved " more? No, it's cuz they peformed . the system measures performance ... You have to compete if you want something out of life .....sorry. And yes, by working hard it is possible cuz ive been proof of it during some point. The best jobs shouldn't go to the kids who ernt to xyz school, but the ppl who can do well on the job, which arent always kids from xyz school. HOWEVER, "A" GRADES SHOULD STILL GO TO THE KIDS WHO ARE CAPABLE OF ACHIEVING THEM. When I said I want "them to b the competition " In the title, I didn't mean that to imply that they need to think they need to be at the top. Kids don't need to be at the top and make Xyz GRADES..what they need to do is work as hard as they are comfortable with and assess themselves accordingly. The only logical thing ji u can control aren't even u abilities, but rather ur efforts. As a result, we should teach our kifs to judge themselves by their efforts(i.g. did I study smart /hard ? Did I study as best as I possibly could which is the only thing that matters?) "Being the competition" means that you strive for the best , for yourself only , ANd that u judge your merits according to the efforts you put into your results. I feel bad for some kids.

Not u @25 lol sry..I was referring 2 @skibum

- I don't think I'm Special or above anyone -sorry if this post was anal!!! U guys r rude