Comments by anonlvone (page 19)

@Dougster - No, asshole. I can tell just by your questions you don't know shit about IT. And I'll also note that you haven't responded to any of the 10 questions I've already posted about Seth's murder. You really should get started on those as I have about 20 more just waiting for you.

A mix net is basically what Tor is you stupid turd. As for Assange being a crypto guy, that hasn't been true for a long time. Both of these comments are suspicious to say the least, and yeah, I'm still waiting for you to answer any of my questions.

@Dougster - Your last comment is beyond stupid. Do you know anything about technology at all? So you think if someone wants to give info to Wikileaks, they're just gonna look up Julian Assange in the white pages, call him on a cell phone, and say, "Oh hey, I have some top secret documents I want to give you. Let's make an appointment so I can swing by your embassy and drop them off?"

@Dougster - Since you're obviously a brainiac, here's some questions I'm sure you can answer: 1) If Seth Rich was killed in a robbery attempt, why wasn't he robbed? Why did the robbers leave behind his watch, jewelry, his billfold, cash in his billfold, etc. 2) Just how often do people get robbed at 3 or 4 am in the morning? If you're a robber, how likely are you to go out in the middle of the night to look for a victim? 3) If this was a robbery, how did the FBI get involved? 4) If this was a robbery, why was his laptop confiscated as evidence? 5) Why are the FBI and police simultaneously claiming that Seth Rich had no contact with Wikileaks and also claiming they never examined his laptop? If they never examined his laptop, how do they know there was no contact??? 6) Why is it that no one knows where his laptop is now? Why is the FBI pointing at the police? Why are the police pointing at the FBI? 7) If the DNC knows that the Russians hacked their servers, why won't they let the FBI examine them? Are they afraid the FBI will discover the servers weren't hacked? 8) Why is the mainstream media so desperate to stop people from even discussing this case? 9) Why did Wikileaks offer a $20,000 reward for any info regarding the murder of Seth Rich? 10) Why did Donna Brazile complain to the DC police about a private investigator who was trying to solve the case??? I could go on and on and on, but I think any person with half a brain cell can see what's going on here. Why can't you?

@NinaBambina - So far you've yet to say anything remotely interesting or insightful. Always be closing? My question is, what are you selling? Why don't you tell us what your hustle is like, because that's the only thing that's going to tell me whether you're on the level or blowing smoke up someone's ass.

@skibum - Here's another question for you. Maybe this one will be easier for you to answer. If Seth Rich had wanted to pass info to Wikileaks, do you think the fact that Kim Dotcom owned and ran a file uploading site - Megaupload - might be relevant? Do you think maybe Kim Dotcom might have been in a position to help Seth Rich? Do you think maybe he might have relevant info, or might actually be in a position to verify that Seth Rich passed info to Wikileaks? Hmmm...

@skibum - can you link me to kim dotcom and sevenspace? i can't find anything on a connection between the two. send me an email with the info if you wish

@twentyfive - Sean Hannity isn't Fox News. Sean Hannity hasn't retracted anything. crypto jew is an ancient term for a reason. the fact you've never heard of it just shows how fucking ignorant you are. nor do i believe you ever did business with Donald Trump. you're just another lying POS. you claim to be from New York, but don't know that his father donated the land for a Talmud Torah center in New York. Or that both of his parents died at the Long Island Jewish Center. Or that every single one of his children has either married a Jew or is dating a Jew. so yeah, the idea that Trump is a crypto jew is obviously just another conspiracy theory. and yeah, as of now you're on ignore too. wouldn't want to hurt your poor little brain by actually waking you out of your slumber

A lot of the guys who go to strip clubs are true pathetic losers (PLs) in every sense of the word *cough* Dougster *cough*. A woman who is comparatively speaking "too attractive" or "too intelligent" is seen as threatening, and they also assume that you won't "put out" i.e., offer "extras." So they will deliberately favor a girl who is less attractive, looks sluttier, comes across as less intelligent over someone like you. This could be one reason why you might get fired for seemingly no reason, it's because the managers realize you aren't going to bring in as much money or be as popular as the extras girls. Since you clearly aren't going to be competing against the extras girls in VIP, what you need to do is find the poshest, most high-end club in your area, and get hired there. If you need to, move out of your area. That way you'll be meeting guys who will be more open to what you're offering, looks, intelligence, and hopefully personality. Basically you would want to push the GFE experience in the club, and if guys want to "date" you then if they seem safe and have the money you can or should offer things like dinner dates or other companionship type activities. You will find guys who will take you up on that in the more high end clubs. That is the way you can work the "you're too beautiful, too smart, wife-material" perception to your advantage.

@twentyfive - No, you've already outed yourself as a closed minded twat. "fake news" is whatever facts liberals find inconvenient and wish to ignore. it's like calling someone a racist or anti-semite or declaring something a conspiracy theory. You think because you can slap a label on it you're justified in shoving your head up your arse. Well, go ahead, keep on doing that and see how well liberals do in the next election when you spend all your time ignoring facts and chasing after real fake news like "the Russians hacked the election!"

Seems to me an attorney should know better than to engage in ad hominem attacks. When a person assists a criminal in breaking the law before the criminal gets arrested, we call him an accomplice. When a person assists a criminal in breaking the law after the criminal gets arrested, we call him a criminal defense lawyer. Q: What is a criminal lawyer? A: Redundant. Q: How can you tell when a lawyer is lying? A: His lips are moving. :P

@Dougster - For the second time you stupid turd, LEARN TO READ ENGLISH OR ARE YOU JUST HOPELESSY RETARDED? "Up until that point, I had supported him wholeheartedly no matter what. After that point, I've been so pissed off I don't even follow politics anymore."

@twentyfive - A crypto Jew is someone who secretly practices Judaism while pretending to belong to another faith.

@Dougster - Since you seem to have a reading disability... "But if Trump is impeached, or if he is compromised, or if he simply fails, then the movement will go on, because as I said before, we didn't vote for a man, we voted for a program." "@twentyfive - I don't know how politically aware you are, but from the way you speak, it seems to me you are completely unaware of the fact that Trump had a huge revolt among his base when he started lobbing cruise missiles at Syria" Now unless someone actually has an intelligent point to make, I'm done here.

Fine, you're on Ignore too you worthless piece of shit. "We, the citizens of America, are now joined in a great national effort to rebuild our country and to restore its promise for all of our people. Every four years, we gather on these steps to carry out the orderly and peaceful transfer of power... Today's ceremony, however, has very special meaning. Because today we are not merely transferring power from one administration to another, or from one party to another -- but we are transferring power from Washington, D.C. and giving it back to you, the American People. What truly matters is not which party controls our government, but whether our government is controlled by the people. January 20th 2017, will be remembered as the day the people became the rulers of this nation again. The forgotten men and women of our country will be forgotten no longer."

@twentyfive - I don't know how politically aware you are, but from the way you speak, it seems to me you are completely unaware of the fact that Trump had a huge revolt among his base when he started lobbing cruise missiles at Syria, because that is not what we elected him to do. Up until that point, I had supported him wholeheartedly no matter what. After that point, I've been so pissed off I don't even follow politics anymore. Trump is a crypto Jew. I wasn't able to see that before, but I see it now. When he tried to start another war in the Middle East for Israel's benefit, well, that was when the scales fell from my eyes. So I don't need you to tell me that his resume, or his background are fake. I don't need you to tell me that he can be dishonest or a cheater. So does this give you your baseline? None of this really matters all that much though. Another thing you don't seem to realize, is that we didn't vote for a person, we voted for a set of policies. All of you people babbling on about liberals vs conservatives, democrats vs republicans, have no idea what is going on. Did any of you even listen to his inauguration speech? He spoke about taking power away from Washington, and giving it back to the people. That is why we voted for him. We wanted him to kill all those multilateral trade agreements that are destroying this country. We wanted him to stop the fraud of foreign worker visas. We wanted him to stop illegal immigration. We want to stop giving American companies tax breaks to ship American jobs overseas. We want Obamacare killed with fire. We want the individual mandates removed. We want the out of control government bureaucracies to stop telling us how to live our lives. We want the out of control intelligence agencies to stop spying on everything we do. That is why we elected him, not to start lobbying cruise missiles at Syria for the benefit of "greater Israel." Trump was elected to carry out a populist and nationalist agenda, and that is why he has been under relentless attack from both Republicans and Democrats throughout the election and throughout his young presidency, because the Republicans and Democrats, and all of those intelligence agencies behind them, are trying to protect all those vested interests that have been andn are betraying this country. But if Trump is impeached, or if he is compromised, or if he simply fails, then the movement will go on, because as I said before, we didn't vote for a man, we voted for a program.

The info I gave about CrowdStrike and the DNC server was not techno-babble in any way. I'm sorry if those who are illiterate or uneducated can't read simple English, but I happen to work in IT, and if I had wanted to get technical I could have. Instead I kept things as basic as possible, and still it went over the head of someone like RandomMember. Not that it matters, if the CIA announced tomorrow that the sun is made of white cheese RandomMember would believe it, 'cuz hey, it's the CIA. Why bother to use your own brain when you can just let other people tell you what to think?

Not really, no. I've been laying out actual facts, and all I get in return is opinion backed up by appeals to authority, which is never proof of anything. RandomMember is a perfect example. "Everyone knows" is not an argument. Pointing to the NY Times or the WSJ is not an argument. I posted a link to a Harvard study that documents what I have been saying for well over a year, which is overwhelming media bias against Trump, 24/7, and RandomMember completely ignores it because it doesn't fit into his deluded, brainwashed world view. So there is a perfect example of someone who "can't handle the truth." Makes you wonder what would happen if our nation were to ever be hit by an EMP attack and all electronics were fried. How would all these idiot zombies ever be able to function without the television to tell them what to believe and what to do? As has often been observed, 1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.

Depends on the management. At one of my favorite clubs, I've learned to trust the tips I get from the managers. If they recommend a dancer to me, or if they give a thumbs down to a dancer, I've learned to listen. I'm a good customer and they want to keep me happy, so if they steer a dancer my way I know it's for a reason.

I'm done trying to reason with people who are incapable of thinking for themselves. You're all a bunch of lemmings. As for Trump being impeached, that won't be the end of things, it'll be the start. And if that day comes, the people to blame will be all of you brainwashed lemmings.

The quotation, dumb ass, was "You can't handle the truth!" Nonetheless, the quotation is oddly appropriate, because anyone who thinks intelligence agencies have anything to do with the truth is too stupid to procreate. William J. Casey, "We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." Feb 1981, Roosevelt Room of the White House, as reported by Barbara Honegger. Since it seems you can hardly be bothered to post in your own thread, I'm wondering if RandomMember with ZERO reviews is an alias of yours?

Congratulations. You're now on Ignore. Even SJG didn't reach that level.

"afterwards we can grab our favorite strippers by the pussy" Sounds good to me. I'm gonna start texting my favorites right now to see who wants to play.

"afterwards we can grab our favorite strippers by the pussy" Sounds good to me. I'm gonna start texting my favorites right now to see who wants to play.

No, you drooling idiot, everyone does not agree that the Russians hacked the DNC. The only source for that claim comes from a company called Crowdstrike, employed by the DNC, whose credibility has been repeatedly questioned. When the FBI requested to examine the DNC servers that were supposedly hacked, the DNC refused. There is therefore, and never has been, any evidence that the Russians hacked the DNC servers. Furthermore, even if the DNC servers had been hacked, attribution would be difficult to assign, as any legitimate IT professional would tell you, which of course is why the DNC went running to a questionable firm such as Crowdstrike, which is known to sell "attribution as a service". Now shut the fuck up before you start making SJG sound like a genius in comparison.