baddy

Just to add my 2c, I have no preferance at all -- I never look at the shoes, though I notice them from time to time when I am at the rail in a drunken haze staring straight forward instead of looking up. Also though I am not very picky about height, so I suspect since height is one of the factors you are looking at you notice things that others do not.

Thinking back, I think I rate clubs with the same attitude as I would rate a woman - there is no such thing as a 10. If a club was totally awesome and I had a great experience it would get a 9, it would take an act of god for a club to get a 10 from me (maybe having the time of my life and leaving the club with more money than I walked in with!).

I try never to get to used to visiting any girl, because they always seem to randomly dissappear when I get really pumped up to see them.

Well all reviews need to be approved by founder i think, they are not instantly added so I am assuming this is what the deal is -- he has some criteria I'm sure, but you guys might want to voice to him that you think he should be a little more strict. Anyways, I agree some are short but not everyone has great writing skills, I think a lot of people think they are submitting a decent review even though it doesn't tell shit to anyone else. Regardless though I would rather have 4 short reviews for a club than no review at all, any info is better than nothing.

Personally I find it funny that he brings up the same stuff over and over, but can see how others would find it annoying. I would have to vote no on the ban, it is easy to just not open his threads.